Return to search

Parametric analysis of economical bay dimensions for steel floor framing

Master of Science / Department of Architectural Engineering and Construction Science / Kimberly Waggle Kramer / This thesis intends to act as a resource for structural engineers or architects to make
informed decisions for selecting economical bay dimensions for a steel‐framed building.
This thesis utilizes a parametric study to investigate how different design variables affect
economical bay sizes for a typical steel‐framed building. While there are many ways to
define an “economical bay”, this analysis defines an economical bay size as the bay size that
uses the least steel, measured in pounds per square foot of floor area. Although other
factors contribute to the overall economy of a steel bay, this analysis only considers the
weight of steel.
Investigated parameters include beam spacing, beam span, girder span, floor live
load intensity, and composite versus non‐composite construction. Beam center‐to‐center
spacing varies from four feet to 12 feet in two‐foot increments. Beam spacing varies
independently from beam span. Beam spans range from 20 feet to 52 feet in four foot
increments. Girder spans also range from 20 feet to 52 feet in four foot increments. Beam
and girder spans vary independently of one another. Floor live loads include 50 lb/ft², 75
lb/ft², and 100 lb/ft². The effect of member construction type is also evaluated in this
analysis by considering both composite and non‐composite beams and girders.
This analysis finds that 20‐foot by 20‐foot bays use the least steel per square foot,
while 52‐foot by 52‐foot bays use the most. Identical bays framed with girders spanning
the long direction use less steel than with beams spanning the long direction. Beams
contribute the majority of the steel weight in the structure, while columns contribute the
least. Live load intensity produces minimal effect on the steel weight, while the use of
composite construction saves 30‐40% of steel weight versus non‐composite construction.

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:KSU/oai:krex.k-state.edu:2097/34501
Date January 1900
CreatorsWolf, Aaron
PublisherKansas State University
Source SetsK-State Research Exchange
Languageen_US
Detected LanguageEnglish
TypeThesis

Page generated in 0.0036 seconds