Return to search

Confronting Ego Threats with Reappraisal versus Rumination

Two experiments compared the effects of two cognitive responses (i.e., rumination and cognitive reappraisal) individuals may adopt when confronted with a threat to self-regard. In Study 1, participants received negative feedback about their social skills and then rated the credibility of the source of the criticism. In Study 2, participants received negative feedback and then were given the opportunity to enhance the self on an unrelated task. Compared to reappraising the negative feedback, ruminating about the feedback led to poorer evaluations of the source of negative feedback and increased self-enhancement, respectively. These findings suggest that, compared to rumination, cognitive reappraisal helps to minimize defensive responses to ego threat.

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:TEXASAandM/oai:repository.tamu.edu:1969.1/ETD-TAMU-2009-05-274
Date16 January 2010
CreatorsCaskey, Ryan
ContributorsSchmeichel, Brandon, Harmon-Jones, Eddie, Ackerman, Jeffrey
Source SetsTexas A and M University
Languageen_US
Detected LanguageEnglish
Formatapplication/pdf

Page generated in 0.0016 seconds