The Mirrlees Review recommends that commodity taxation should in general be uniform, but with some goods consumed in conjunction with labour supply (such as child care) left untaxed. This paper examines the validity of this claim in an optimal income tax framework. Contrary to the recommendation of the Review, our theoretical results imply that even if all goods other than the good needed for working are separable from leisure, the optimal tax on these goods should not be uniform. Instead, goods with larger expenditure elasticities should be discouraged relatively more by the tax system. If the government fully subsidises the cost of the good needed for working, then commodity taxation is uniform under the standard separability assumption. Our results imply that the optimal commodity tax system is dependent on the expenditure side of the government. A calibration exercise presented in the paper suggests that these results can be quantitatively important.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:UPSALLA1/oai:DiVA.org:uu-199496 |
| Date | January 2013 |
| Creators | Bastani, Spencer, Blomquist, Sören, Pirttilä, Jukka |
| Publisher | Uppsala universitet, UCFS, Uppsala universitet, UCFS, Uppsala universitet, UCFS, University of Tampere, Uppsala : Department of Economics, Uppsala University |
| Source Sets | DiVA Archive at Upsalla University |
| Language | English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Report, info:eu-repo/semantics/report, text |
| Format | application/pdf |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| Relation | Working paper / Uppsala Center for Fiscal Studies, Uppsala University ; 2013:5 |
Page generated in 0.0023 seconds