As organizations utilize less hierarchical forms of leadership, the study of how leadership emerges within teams continues to grow in importance. Despite many theoretical perspectives used to study leadership emergence, little is understood about the actual process by which a collective structure emerges. In the current work, I address two of the primary limitations within this literature: imprecise theoretical perspectives and methodological challenges in studying emergence. Specifically, although there are many conceptual works that describe the leadership emergence process, these descriptions do not have enough precision to be able to design a model with formal rules, a necessary requirement for studying emergence. Additionally, studying leadership emergence requires the study of newly formed teams frequently over time, which is challenging to accomplish using existing methods. To address the two above limitations, in the current work, I translate two dominant process-oriented perspectives of leadership emergence (social interactionist and social cognitive) into formal theories that include a series of testable hypotheses. In doing so, these theories outline the essential elements and process mechanisms of each theoretical perspective. Next, I use these theories to design two agent-based models to simulate the process by which leadership emerges within teams, under each perspective. Using the software NetLogo, I simulate 500 newly formed teams over the initial period of 500 dyadic interactions (i.e., hours). Finally, after simulating these models, I use the resulting data to test the predictions from each theoretical perspective. In addition to testing the hypotheses from each model, I also utilize agent-based modeling to systematically test the relative importance of the unique individual-level elements and process mechanisms from each model. From this entire process, I generate results about (1) how well the agent-based models represent the respective perspectives, and (2) the relative influence each perspective's unique elements and mechanisms have on team outcomes. Overall, results generally supported the core concepts from each perspective, but also identified areas where each perspective needs to revisit for theory on leadership emergence to advance. Specifically, the results illustrated that certain individual-level elements were most influential for leadership emergence. For the social interactionist perspective, it was the comparison between implicit leadership theories and self-prototypical leadership characteristics. For the social cognitive perspective, it was leader self-schemas. Additionally, results indicated that future work may need to revisit the conceptualization of both leadership structure schemas, as well as the dynamic process of weighting implicit leadership theories. Finally, predictions about the rate of leadership emergence over time within the social cognitive perspective were the only predictions that were not supported. From these results, I present multiple themes as a conceptual road map for the advancement of leadership emergence theory. I argue that the lack of support regarding leadership emergence trajectories presents opportunities for a reconceptualization of emergence at the event level, as well as new modeling procedures to capture emergence as it occurs. I also present future study ideas that can directly test the competing assumptions from each perspective. In total, I argue that this work advances the study of leadership emergence by adopting a method that helped integrate two dominant perspectives of leadership emergence, possibly laying the groundwork for the development of a combined formal theory. / Doctor of Philosophy / The purpose of this dissertation was to understand how specific individuals in teams become viewed as a leader, when there is no formal hierarchy. This represents the process of leadership emergence. Most research studying leadership in teams focuses on who becomes a leader. As a result, little is known about the exact process by which certain individuals emerge as a leader. Fortunately, there are theories that represent potential ideas for how this process occurs. However, these theories are difficult to test, as this type of research requires the study of newly formed teams over time, a great methodological challenge. In my dissertation, I attempt to address this challenge by simulating newly formed teams over time using a form of computer simulation called Agent-Based Modeling (ABM). In using ABM, I aimed to learn how two theoretical perspectives both compare and contrast to one another, in how they both explain the process of leadership emergence. In my primary analysis, I simulated 500 teams, working together over a period of hours. After using this data to test a series of predictions, I found that most predictions were supported across each theoretical perspective. This provided evidence that the simulations represented each theoretical perspective. However, the results also showed that certain parts of each theoretical perspective need more research. In recognizing the weaknesses in each perspective in modeling leadership emergence, I introduce multiple opportunities for theoretical integration, in that ideas from both models can be combined into one. Therefore, the findings from this research lay the groundwork for the development of one single theory for how leadership emerges in groups. Ultimately, this could help understand how leadership in teams occurs, which can lead to new interventions to improve team leadership and performance.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:VTETD/oai:vtechworks.lib.vt.edu:10919/107279 |
| Date | 06 July 2020 |
| Creators | Acton, Bryan Patrick |
| Contributors | Psychology, Foti, Roseanne J., Beal, Daniel J., Calderwood, Charles, Hernandez, Jorge Ivan |
| Publisher | Virginia Tech |
| Source Sets | Virginia Tech Theses and Dissertation |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Dissertation |
| Format | ETD, application/pdf |
| Rights | In Copyright, http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ |
Page generated in 0.0025 seconds