This thesis considers how the international response to egregious crimes can be made more consistent and effective. It focuses in particular on the Security Council as the authorising mechanism for intervention and comprehensively evaluates the proposals for its reform. It shows that contrary to several existing proposals, reform to the Security Council would not improve its authorisation of international action to address atrocity crimes. Similarly, the thesis considers proposals that seek to circumvent the authority of the Security Council but rejects their capacity to bring about a more consistent humanitarian regime. Finally, it robustly considers and argues for the use of regional organisations as alternative authorising mechanisms during mass atrocities.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:bl.uk/oai:ethos.bl.uk:764735 |
| Date | January 2018 |
| Creators | Adediran, Bolarinwa |
| Contributors | Suzuki, Shogo ; Pattison, James |
| Publisher | University of Manchester |
| Source Sets | Ethos UK |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Electronic Thesis or Dissertation |
| Source | https://www.research.manchester.ac.uk/portal/en/theses/reforming-the-authorising-mechanism-for-intervention-how-can-the-responsibility-to-protect-be-achieved(330f8a40-4256-4031-a017-b90ca8de9d3b).html |
Page generated in 0.0025 seconds