Issues surrounding water scarcity will become topical in future as global fresh water resources
become more limited thus threaten crop production. Predicted climate change and increasing
population growth will place more pressure on agriculture to produce more food using less
water. As such, efforts have now shifted to identifying previously neglected underutilised
species (NUS) as possible crops that could be used to bridge the food gap in future. Taro
(Colocasia esculenta L. Schott) and bambara groundnut (Vigna subterranea L. Verdc)
currently occupy low levels of utilisation in South Africa. Both crops are cultivated using
landraces with no improved varieties available. Information describing their agronomy and
water–use is limited and remains a bottleneck to their promotion. The aim of this study was to
determine the drought tolerance and water–use of selected landraces of taro and bambara
groundnut from KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.
In order to meet the specific objectives for taro and bambara groundnut management, an
approach involving conventional and modelling techniques was used.
Three taro landraces [Dumbe Lomfula (DL), KwaNgwanase (KW) and Umbumbulu
(UM)] were collected from the North Coast and midlands of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa, in
2010. The UM landrace was classified as Eddoe type taro (C. esculenta var. antiquorum)
characterised by a central corm and edible side cormels. The DL and KW landraces were
classified as Dasheen (C. esculenta var. esculenta), characterised by a large edible main corm
and smaller side cormels. A bambara groundnut landrace was collected from Jozini, KwaZulu-
Natal, and characterised into three selections (‘Red’, ‘Light-brown’ and ‘Brown’) based on
seed coat colour. Seed colour was hypothesised to have an effect on seed quality. Field and
rainshelter experiments were conducted for both taro and bambara landraces at Roodeplaat in
Pretoria and Ukulinga Research Farm in Pietermaritzburg, over two growing seasons (2010/11
and 2011/12).
The objective of the field trials for taro and bambara groundnut was to determine
mechanisms associated with drought tolerance in taro and bambara groundnut landraces.
Experiments were laid out in a split-plot design where irrigation [fully irrigated (FI) and rainfed (RF)] was the main factor and landraces (3 landraces of either taro or bambara
groundnut) were sub-factors. Treatments were arranged in a randomised complete block
design (RCBD), replicated three times. Rainfed trials were established with irrigation to allow
for maximum crop stand. Thereafter, irrigation was withdrawn. Whilst experimental designs
and layouts for taro and bambara groundnut were similar, differences existed with regards to
plot sizes and plant spacing. Trials were planted on a total land area of 500 m2 and 144 m2, for
taro and bambara groundnut, respectively. Plant spacing was 1 m x 1 m for taro and 0.3 m x
0.3 m for bambara groundnut. Irrigation scheduling in the FI treatment was based on ETo and
Kc and was applied using sprinkler irrigation system.
Separate rainshelter experiments were conducted for taro and bambara groundnut
landraces at Roodeplaat, to evaluate growth, yield and water-use of taro and bambara
groundnut landraces under a range of water regimes. The experimental design was similar for
both crops, a RCBD with two treatment factors: irrigation level [30, 60 and 100% crop water
requirement (ETa)] and landrace (3 landraces), replicated three times. Irrigation water was
applied using drip irrigation system based on ETo and Kc.
Data collection in field and rainshelter trials included time to emergence, plant height, leaf
number, leaf area index (LAI), stomatal conductance and chlorophyll content index (CCI). For
taro field trials, vegetative growth index (VGI) was also determined. Yield and yield
components (harvest index, biomass, corm number and mass) as well as water–use efficiency
(WUE) were determined at harvest.Intercropping of taro and bambara groundnut was evaluated under dryland conditions
using farmers’ fields at Umbumbulu, KwaZulu–Natal, South Africa. The experimental design
was a RCBD replicated three times. Intercrop combinations included taro and bambara
groundnut sole crops, a 1:1 (one row taro to one row bambara groundnut) and 1:2 intercrop
combinations. The taro UM landrace and ‘Red’ bambara groundnut landrace selection were
used in the intercropping study.
Lastly, data collected from field and rainshelter experiments were used to develop crop
parameters to calibrate and validate the FAO’s AquaCrop model for taro and bambara
groundnut landraces. The UM landrace was used for taro while the ‘Red’ landrace selection was used for bambara groundnut. AquaCrop was calibrated using observed data from
optimum (FI) experiments conducted during 2010/11. Model validation was done using
observations from field and rainshelter experiments conducted during 2011/12 as well as
independent data. Results showed that all taro landraces were slow to emerge (≈ 49 days after planting).
Stomatal conductance declined under conditions of limited water availability (RF, 60% and
30% ETa). The UM landrace showed better stomatal regulation compared with KW and DL
landraces under conditions of limited water availability. Plant growth (plant height, leaf
number, LAI and CCI) of taro landraces was lower under conditions of limited water
availability (RF, 60% and 30% ETa) relative to optimum conditions (FI and 100% ETa). The
UM landrace showed moderate reductions in growth compared with the DL and KW
landraces, suggesting greater adaptability to water limited conditions. The VGI showed a large
reduction in growth under RF conditions and confirmed the UM landrace’s adaptability to
limited water availability. Limited water availability (RF, 60% and 30% ETa) resulted in
lower biomass, HI, and final yield in taro landraces relative to optimum conditions (FI and
100% ETa). For all trials, the DL landrace failed to produce any yield. WUE of taro landraces
was consistent for the three irrigation levels (30, 60 and 100% ETa); however, on average, the
UM landrace was shown to have a higher WUE than the KW landrace.
Bambara groundnut landraces were slow to emerge (up to 35 days after planting). ‘Red’
and ‘Brown’ landrace selections emerged better than the ‘Light-brown’ landrace selection,
confirming the effect of seed colour on early establishment performance. Plant growth
(stomatal conductance, CCI, plant height, leaf number, LAI and biomass accumulation) was
lower under conditions of limited water availability (RF, 60% and 30% ETa) relative to
optimum conditions (FI and 100% ETa). The ‘Red’ landrace selection showed better
adaptation to stress. Limited water availability resulted in early flowering and reduced
flowering duration as well as early senescence and maturity of bambara groundnut landrace
selections. The ‘Red’ landrace selection showed delayed leaf senescence under conditions of
limited water availability. Yield reductions of up to 50% were observed under water limited
conditions (RF, 60% and 30% ETa) relative to optimum conditions (FI and 100% ETa). Water
use efficiency increased at 60% and 30% ETa, respectively, relative to 100% ETa, implying
adaptabilityto limited water availability. The ‘Red’ landrace selection showed better yield
stability and WUE compared with the ‘Brown’ and ‘Light-brown’ landrace selections
suggesting that seed colour may be used as a selection criterion for drought tolerance in
bambara groundnut landraces.
The intercropping study showed that intercropping, as an alternative cropping system, had
more potential than monocropping. Evaluation of growth parameters showed that taro plant
height was generally unaffected by intercropping but lower leaf number was observed as
compared with the sole crop. Bambara groundnut plants were taller and had more leaves under
intercropping relative to the sole crop. Although not statistically significant, yield was
generally lower in the intercrops compared with the sole crops. Evaluation of intercrop
productivity using the land equivalent ratio (LER) showed that intercropping taro and bambara
groundnut at a ratio of 1:1 was more productive (LER = 1.53) than intercropping at a ratio of
1:2 (LER = 1.23).
The FAO’s AquaCrop model was then calibrated for the taro UM landrace and ‘Red’
bambara groundnut landrace selection. This was based on observations from previous
experiments that suggested them to be drought tolerant and stable. Calibration results for taro
and bambara groundnut landraces showed an excellent fit between predicted and observed parameters for canopy cover (CC), biomass and yield. Model validation for bambara
groundnut showed good model performance under field (FI and RF) conditions. Model
performance was satisfactory for rainshelters. Validation results for taro showed good model
performance under all conditions (field and rainshelters), although the model over-estimated
CC for the declining stage of canopy growth under RF conditions. Model verification using
independent data for taro showed equally good model performance.
In conclusion, the taro UM landrace and ‘Red’ bambara groundnut landrace selection were
shown to be drought tolerant and adapted to low levels of water–use. The mechanisms
responsible for drought tolerance in the taro UM landrace and ‘Red’ bambara groundnut
landrace selection were described as drought avoidance and escape. The taro UM landrace and
‘Red’ bambara groundnut landraces avoided stress through stomatal regulation, energy
dissipation (loss of chlorophyll) as well as reducing canopy size (plant height, leaf number and
LAI), which translates to minimised transpirational water losses. This indicated landrace
viii
adaptability to low levels of water–use. The ‘Red’ bambara groundnut landrace selection showed phenological plasticity and escaped drought by flowering early, delaying leaf
senescence, and maturing early under conditions of limited water availability. Performance of
the ‘Red’ landrace selection lends credence to the use of seed coat colour as a possible
selection criterion for drought tolerance in bambara groundnut, and possibly for other
landraces with variegated seed. The taro UM landrace escaped drought by maturing early
under conditions of limited water availability. The FAO’s AquaCrop model was successfully
calibrated and validated for taro UM and ‘Red’ bambara groundnut landraces. The calibration
and validation of AquaCrop for taro is the first such attempt and represents progress in the
modelling of neglected underutilised crops. The calibration and validation of AquaCrop for
taro requires further fine-tuning while that for bambara groundnut still needs to be tested for
more diverse landraces. / Thesis (Ph.D.)-University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg, 2011.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:netd.ac.za/oai:union.ndltd.org:ukzn/oai:http://researchspace.ukzn.ac.za:10413/9999 |
| Date | 14 November 2013 |
| Creators | Mabhaudhi, Tafadzwanashe. |
| Contributors | Modi, Albert Thembinkosi. |
| Source Sets | South African National ETD Portal |
| Language | en_ZA |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Thesis |
Page generated in 0.0038 seconds