One of the distinguishing marks of American Evangelicalism is a commitment to the Bible as the only
authority for faith and practice. A question often debated is whether the Bible should be viewed
as inerrant, and if so, how the concept of inerrancy should be understood. This study suggests that
the concept of inerrancy should be maintained, but that the concept must be understood in
accordance with the way in which the biblical materials present the concepts of truth and its
opposite. The value of the doctrine of inerrancy must be found in a better understanding not only
of the didactic portions but also of the phenomena ofthe biblical materials.
The first chapter of this study looks at nature American Evangelicalism and considers the
historical development of the doctrine of the inerrancy of the Bible. The next three chapters
consider in turn each of three divisions within American
Evangelicalism about the understanding and usage of the doctrine of inerrancy: Complete
Inerrancy, Conditional Inerrancy, and Limited Inerrancy. Complete Inerrancy is the most rigid of
the three, maintaining that in the original writings of the Bible there were no errors, neither in
spiritual nor in secular matters. Conditional Inerrancy conditions the
understanding of inerrancy by the intent and purpose for the Bible as understood from the
phenomena ofthe texts. The focus is shifted from the autographs of the Scripture to the texts which
the contemporary person has to read and study. Limited Inerrancy limits the usage both of the term
and of the concept inerrant in relation to the Bible, preferring the descriptor infallible, arguing
that neither in the original writings nor in the present texts of the Bible is inerrancy to be
found. There are errors in the texts, but they do not take away from the ability of the Bible to
accomplish its divine purpose ofbringing people into contact with the Redeemer God. The last
chapter draws from the analysis of the
arguments within American Evangelicalism material needed to construct a redefined concept of
inerrancy which maintains its importance. / Philosophy, Practical & Systematic Theology / D. Th. (Systematic Theology)
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:netd.ac.za/oai:union.ndltd.org:unisa/oai:umkn-dsp01.int.unisa.ac.za:10500/15851 |
| Date | 11 1900 |
| Creators | Railey, James Howard |
| Contributors | Konig, Adrio |
| Source Sets | South African National ETD Portal |
| Language | English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Thesis |
| Format | 1 online resource (x, 350 leaves) |
Page generated in 0.0024 seconds