Return to search

THE DIRECT AND INDIRECT EFFECTS OF NUTRIENT ENRICHMENT ON THE PARASITES OF LARGEMOUTH BASS

The interactions between parasites, hosts, and the ecosystems they live in are complex and diverse. This can make predicting how they will respond to pressures like nutrient enrichment difficult. However, this endeavor is important, due to the far-reaching effects it has on ecosystems functioning, industries like aquaculture, and even human health. Even with the significance of this topic, there are key parts of the picture that have received little research attention. For this reason, I chose to study the effects of nutrient enrichment on parasite-host interactions at two different scales, first investigating the interaction directly between parasites and their host, and then manipulating experimental ponds to look at trophic effects. Using the theory of ecological stoichiometry as a conceptual framework allowed for comparison across the two investigations. In both studies, I used largemouth bass and the macro parasites of their digestive tract as my study system, due to the importance of largemouth bass as sport fish, their high trophic status, and diverse parasite assemblages. My first study examined the effects of eutrophication on parasite-host interactions occurring within the host. It centered on four hypotheses: 1) the nutrient content of different host tissues (infection sites) varies within and across hosts, 2) the nutrient contents of parasite genera differ from that of their host tissue(s), 3) the nutrient contents of parasite genera differ from one another, and 4) nutrient availability within specific host tissues is related to the nutrient content and abundance of parasite genera within tissues. I quantified the nutrient content (carbon (C), nitrogen (N), and phosphorous (P) and their ratios) of parasitic infracommunities in the tissues of the liver, stomach, pyloric caeca, intestines, and visceral mesentery of 30 largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides). I found stoichiometric variation across host tissues and that fish collection site explained variation in pyloric caeca N:P ratios. Parasitic genera differed in their nutrient content with actively feeding parasite forms having higher %N and lower C:N ratios than encysted/non-reproductive forms. In addition, the %C of both actively feeding parasites varied across organs, and, for one genus, this variation reflected differences in host tissue %C. Finally, I found that the total number of actively feeding parasites in the pyloric caeca increased with that tissue’s N:P ratio. My results suggest that parasites encounter significant variation in nutrient availability within and across hosts, and that this variation can influence the nutrient content and abundance of some actively feeding parasites within specific tissues. To determine if the effects from my first study were a result of nutrient changes to host tissues or if they were an artifact of changes occurring at other trophic levels caused by nutrient addition, I conducted an experimental manipulation of a short trophic system. I applied two treatments, a fertilized treatment and a control, to 14 ponds stocked with largemouth bass. I hypothesized that adding a low N:P fertilizer to the ponds would result in fewer parasites in the pyloric caeca of the bass in accordance with findings from my previous work. Alternatively, I hypothesized that indirect changes to intermediate hosts would be responsible for changes in parasite abundance. To measure the effects of nutrient additions on multiple trophic levels, samples of fine particulate organic matter (FPOM), benthic invertebrates, and vertebrate prey were taken from each pond. Stocked bass were retrieved and dissected to obtain samples for nutrient analysis from their pyloric caeca, and to quantify parasite abundances. My treatment was able to affect the %P, C:N, C:P, and N:P of the FPOM in the ponds. Benthic invertebrate biomass was negatively correlated with FPOM %P. I did not find a direct effect of benthic invertebrates on vertebrate prey species, but fertilized ponds had a smaller decrease in the number of vertebrate prey over the course of the experiment. Counterintuitively, the %N of the pyloric caeca of fish in the fertilized ponds decreased, and the %C and C:N increased in relation to the number of vertebrate prey, but %P did not change. The treatment status of the pond and the nutrients of the pyloric caeca did not affect the number of parasites that were found, but parasite numbers were positively associated with prey fish. This result would suggest the number of intermediate hosts, in this case, prey fish, is the determining factor for parasitic loads in the bass I collected. The indirect effects of trophic interaction and the direct effects of changes to host and parasite dynamics both play important roles in predicting the outcome of eutrophication on disease. The conflicting results of these two studies highlight the need for in-depth knowledge of the systems being affected by nutrient additions.

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:siu.edu/oai:opensiuc.lib.siu.edu:theses-4162
Date01 August 2023
CreatorsStanley, Adrienne
PublisherOpenSIUC
Source SetsSouthern Illinois University Carbondale
Detected LanguageEnglish
Typetext
Formatapplication/pdf
SourceTheses

Page generated in 0.002 seconds