Return to search

Auditor and underwriter industry specialization/differentiation: evidence from IPO underpricing and long-term performance

The dissertation examines IPO underpricing and long-term performance to assess
the use of industry specialization as a differentiation strategy by audit firms and
underwriters. Prior studies indicate that prestigious auditors or underwriters (e.g., Big 6
auditors) are associated with IPO underpricing. I extend existing literature by
incorporating market share as a refined measure of auditor (underwriter) reputation. In
particular, I define a differentiated auditor (underwriter) as the market leader that
possesses significantly higher market share than their competitors in the client industry. I
hypothesize that the impact of auditor (underwriter) reputation in the IPO setting
depends on whether the audit firm (underwriter) has successfully differentiated itself
from competitors within client industries. My results show that as audit firm
(underwriter) industry market share increases without differentiation, the IPO
underpricing increases. It appears that this group of auditors (underwriters) intentionally
engages in high-risk IPOs in order to gain fee advantages. In contrast, differentiated
auditors (underwriters) are related to lower IPO underpricing because their reputation assist in reducing information asymmetry between issuers and investors. My study is
important because it shows that the benefits previously thought to be attributable to a
very large set of auditors and underwriters stems primary

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:tamu.edu/oai:repository.tamu.edu:1969.1/4149
Date30 October 2006
CreatorsWang, Kun
ContributorsWilkins, Michael
PublisherTexas A&M University
Source SetsTexas A and M University
Languageen_US
Detected LanguageEnglish
TypeBook, Thesis, Electronic Dissertation, text
Format392356 bytes, electronic, application/pdf, born digital

Page generated in 0.0023 seconds