Background: In health care services, equity is the delivery of similar care for similar needs (horizontal equity), and the delivery of more care for higher needs (vertical equity). This study assessed the extent to which primary care provision is equitable across gender, age and socioeconomic groups, and whether any observed disparity is associated with the type of primary care remuneration model to which a family practice belongs. Remuneration models include Fee For Service in which the physician is paid for each encounter, Salary where payment is fixed for the number of hours worked, and Capitation where payment is tied to the number of patients under the care of the provider, and very little or no additional compensation is provided for each patient encounter. // Methods: This thesis used data from a cross sectional study of 5,361 patients receiving care from practices (n) in which primary care providers were remunerated by Fee For Service (35), Salary (35), or Capitation (68). Multi-level linear or logistic regressions were used to assess the impact of gender, age and socioeconomic strata on quality of care. The quality of health service delivery and health promotion were assessed through surveys based on the Primary Care Assessment Tool (n=5,111). The quality of preventive care (n=4,108) and chronic disease management (n-514) were evaluated through chart abstraction using the Canadian recommendations for care as the standard. The analyses were conducted stratified by remuneration model to allow the impact of the model on the extent of disparity in quality of care between social strata to be assessed. // Results: Men and women reported similar quality of health service delivery. Women were significantly more likely to be up to date on their preventive care, but adherence to recommended guidelines for chronic disease management was better for men in the Fee For Service practices. Older individuals reported better health service delivery than younger ones. The quality of chronic disease management was also age dependent with better care delivered to individuals ages 60-69. Individuals of low income and education had better accessibility than those not disadvantaged in the Salaried model and Fee For Service, but not Capitation model. Despite their higher health risks, these individuals were not more likely to receive healthy lifestyle counseling. // Conclusions: Significant inequalities in the care of patients were found across social strata. In some cases, these inequalities are deemed appropriate; a justifiable response to differing health care needs. In other cases, they are deemed inappropriate and representing inequities in the delivery of care. Some of the observed disparities were present in one remuneration model but not others, suggesting that the payment approach may be contributing to these differences. The results raise the concern that the capitation remuneration structure may compromise accessibility.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:uottawa.ca/oai:ruor.uottawa.ca:10393/19836 |
| Date | January 2011 |
| Creators | Dahrouge, Simone |
| Contributors | Kristjansson, Elizabeth, Hogg, William |
| Publisher | Université d'Ottawa / University of Ottawa |
| Source Sets | Université d’Ottawa |
| Language | English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Thesis |
Page generated in 0.0022 seconds