No description available.

No description available.

No description available.

No description available.

No description available.

The transition from normal mammary development to the formation of aberrant cancerous tissues requires numerous mutations to occur. These alterations allow cancer cells to evade the usually strictly controlled pathways of survival, proliferation and self-renewal. The cell of origin for most tumours remains unknown but evidence that a sub-population of stem-like cells, termed cancer initiating cells, exists within solid cancers is strong.

I have investigated epigenetic mechanisms of acquired endocrine-resistance in breast cancer using an in vitro model system based on estrogen-dependent MCF7 cells and their derivatives, LCC1 and LCC9. LCC1 cells, derived from MCF7 after passage in ovariectomised mice and routinely cultured in vitro in the absence of estrogen, exhibit estrogen-independent growth. They retain sensitivity to tamoxifen and fulvestrant. LCC9 cells, derived from LCC1 cells by growing them in increasing concentrations of fulvestrant, are completely estrogen-independent and are resistant to fulvestrant and cross-resistant to tamoxifen. When compared to MCF7 cells, LCC1 cells have marked up-regulation of the estrogen receptor α (ERα) protein that is not concomitant with increased estrogen receptor 1 (ESR1) transcription, suggesting a role for estrogen in controlling the proteasomal degradation of ERα. However, despite being grown in the same estrogen-deprived conditions, LCC9 cells do not have up-regulated ERα levels. As LCC1 cells retain sensitivity to tamoxifen and fulvestrant, these data suggest that LCC1 have developed estrogen-independence through ERα uncoupled from its ligand. However, LCC9 cells appear to have developed an alternative mechanism which is not dependent on ERα, presumably explaining their resistance to fulvestrant. I have studied global gene expression changes in the presence and absence of estrogen in these cell lines, using oligonucleotide microarrays, and correlated these data with global DNA methylation data derived from methylation arrays, which interrogate the methylation status of approximately 27,000 CpG dinucleotides in the genome. The analysis led to the discovery of more than 5,000 genes that were potentially either up-regulated or down-regulated by estrogen in MCF7 cells, either directly or indirectly. The transcriptional response to estrogen was generally muted in LCC1 and LCC9 compared with MCF7, but was not completely absent. I used various methods based on differential gene expression to parse the data, including gene ontology analysis, aiming to select genes for further mechanistic study. However, none of these methods led to the conclusive identification of a specific gene (or set of genes) that might have accounted for the physiological differences between the cell lines. In one strategy, I reasoned that, as the endocrine-resistant cells had lost their estrogen-dependence, genes involved might be regulated in an estrogen-dependent manner in MCF7 cells, without exhibiting misregulation in LCC9. This led to the identification of DUSP1 as a candidate gene, which was taken forward for mechanistic study because of its potential role in regulating ERα expression. However, when over-expressing DUSP1 in LCC9 cells, I could not demonstrate any effect on ERα levels. The final approach taken was to identify genes that might have been epigenetically deregulated, being both estrogen-regulated and deregulated in association with aberrant DNA methylation in the estrogen-independent cell lines. Surprisingly, given the phenotypic differences between the cell lines, only a very few genes were significantly methylated between cell lines. Of those that were differentially methylated between MCF7 cells and LCC1/9, only three exhibited the expected inverse correlation between methylation and expression. Of these, the gene CYBA was selected for further investigation. CYBA is a critical component of the NAPDH oxidase complex which is involved in generating oxygen free-radicals. My work suggests CYBA expression is estrogen-dependent, and that chronic estrogen deprivation leads to the epigenetic inactivation of CYBA in breast cancer cells. I speculate that the epigenetic suppression of CYBA may protect cells from the oxidant damage that results from estrogen deprivation and may be part of the mechanism that leads to acquired endocrine-resistance in previously sensitive cells.

<p>The ABL family of non-receptor tyrosine kinases, ABL1 (also known as c-ABL) and ABL2 (also known as Arg), links diverse extracellular stimuli to signaling pathways that control cell growth, survival, adhesion, migration and invasion. ABL tyrosine kinases play an oncogenic role in human leukemias. However, the role of ABL kinases in solid tumors including breast cancer progression and metastasis is just emerging. </p><p>To evaluate whether ABL family kinases are involved in breast cancer development and metastasis, we first analyzed genomic data from large-scale screen of breast cancer patients. We found that ABL kinases are up-regulated in invasive breast cancer patients and high expression of ABL kinases correlates with poor prognosis and early metastasis. Using xenograft mouse models combined with genetic and pharmacological approaches, we demonstrated that ABL kinases are required for regulating breast cancer progression and metastasis to the bone. Using next generation sequencing and bioinformatics analysis, we uncovered a critical role for ABL kinases in promoting multiple oncogenic pathways including TAZ and STAT5 signaling networks and the epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT). These findings revealed a role for ABL kinases in regulating breast cancer tumorigenesis and bone metastasis and provide a rationale for targeting breast tumors with ABL-specific inhibitors.</p> / Dissertation

Matrix Metallopeptidase 1 (MMP-1) expression has repeatedly been correlated to tumorigenesis and metastasis. Yet, MMP-1 regulation in a metastatic context remains largely unknown. Here we confirm differential MMP-1 expression in mammary carcinoma cells with varied metastatic potentials and identify a mechanism differentially regulating MMP-1. We show that MMP-1 expression is regulated by an AP-1 element in its promoter in highly metastatic MDA-MB-231 mammary carcinoma cell derivatives. Fra-1, an AP-1 family transcription factor, differentially binds this element in highly metastatic derivatives compared to low-metastatic cells and is required for MMP1 expression. Fra-1 mRNA levels are unchanged in the cell variants, however its protein levels are higher in the metastatic cells. There was no change in protein degradation rates, while protein synthesis rates of Fra-1 increased. These results suggest that protein translation of Fra-1 is differentially regulated in these cells. Consistent with the importance of Fra-1 for tumor growth, we found that Fra-1 overexpression is sufficient to increase cell motility and anchorage independent growth. These results suggest that Fra-1 regulation is critical for regulation of MMP-1 and metastasis.

No description available.