Tesis doctoral--Universidad de Salamanca, 1986. / Notes bibliogr. Bibliogr. p. 177-187.

No description available.

No description available.

Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Pennsylvania, 1942. / "List of American divorce plays": p. 110-112; Bibliography: p. 113-116.

Thesis (B. Div.)--St. Vladimir's Orthodox Theological Seminary, 1957. / Includes appendix in Russian. Includes bibliographical references (leaves [55]-56).

Th. 3e cycle--Droit--Rennes 1, 1979.

This study investigated whether attendance at the Children Cope With Divorce program for divorcing parents was associated with differences in the litigation behavior of the parents consistent with a lowered level of conflict between the parties. 130 cases from Morgan County, Indiana, in which the parents attended the program were randomly selected and compared with 130 cases from the same county in which the parents did not attend the program. As a control, 130 cases from before, and 130 cases from after the date on which program attendance became a requirement in Morgan County, were randomly selected from Tipton County, Indiana, where divorcing parents do not attend a program.Measures of mean time in litigation (MTL) and of the numbers of 4 types of court petition were obtained for each of the 4 groups from court records. Four hypotheses predicting an association between program attendance and shorter MTLs and lower mean numbers of court petitions filed were tested. Hypotheses One and Two were tested by one-way multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA). Hypothesis Three was tested by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Hypothesis Four was tested by 2 X 2 multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA). All test results were nonsignificant. None of the hypotheses was supported.Possible reasons for the nonsignificant results are presented, as are limitations of the design and methodology. Other possible dependent variables which might be measured are described. The importance of collecting demographic data is mentioned. Limitations of the program studied in this project are discussed at length. In the absence of clear evidence of the effectiveness of any type of such program for divorcing parents, the courts must weigh the possible value of such a program against its cost. However, given our present state of knowledge about such programs, sponsors should select a program which presents a broad range of information. / Department of Counseling Psychology and Guidance Services

L'égalité et la justice dans la famille sont nécessaires dans la mesure où il s'agit de sauvegarder les droits fondamentaux des femmes, des hommes et des enfants à la fois en tant qu'individus et composants d'une famille. La littérature juridique nous apprend que le divorce, institution fort ancienne permettant de rompre de manière définitive le lien conjugal, est étroitement lié à l'idéologie dominante et aux fluctuations politiques du pays considéré. En France, l'histoire du divorce est marquée par des étapes d'évolutions successives d'interdiction et de rétablissement. Une fois admis, il permet de découvrir que le choix législatif fondamental s'articule autour de deux idées : diversifier les cas de divorce afin de répondre à la pluralité des situations de crise, et de dédramatiser le divorce en incitant les époux à trouver un accord sur ses conséquences. Au Liban, le divorce est admis chez les musulmans. Dans la mesure où le système de statut personnel est d'inspiration religieuse et basé sur le Coran, le droit de divorcer n'était pas soumis au développement. La question qui se pose est celle de son évolution. L'étude comparative des deux systèmes français et libanais nous a fait constater que l'égalité au sein du couple en France avait été un souci pour le législateur français, pour aboutir à une égalité dans le sujet du divorce. En revanche, on verra que cette égalité au sein de la famille libanaise est loin d'être appliquée. / Equality and justice are necessary in the family for their safeguard the fundamental of women men, children at the same as individuals and components of a family. Legal literature acknowledge that the divorce, a very old institution that tends to break severely the marriage bond, is closely related to the dominant ideology and political variations of the considered countries.The history of divorce in France was marked by successive stages of development : prohibition and restoration. Once admitted it allows to discover that the legislative fundamental choice revolves upon two ideas: diversifying divorce cases so we can find a solution for the plurality of crisis situation, dramatize divorce by encouraging spouses to agree on its consequences. ln Lebanon divorce is permissible for Muslims. To the extent that the personal statutes system is religiously inspired and based on the Koran. The right to divorce was not subject to development. The question that arises is that of evolution.The comparative study of both French and Lebanese law systems has made us that equality in marriage in France was a concern for the French legislature. To achieve equality in the subject of divorce. However, we will see this equality within the family in Lebanon is far being implemented.

La littérature juridique nous apprend que le divorce, institution fort ancienne permettant de rompre de manière définitive et radicale le lien conjugal, est étroitement lié à l'idéologie dominante et aux fluctuations politiques du pays considéré. La comparaison des législations en matière de divorce, objet de notre étude, permet alors, d'une part, de constater que l'évolution du « droit de divorcer » est marquée par des étapes successives d'interdiction et de rétablissement du divorce aussi bien en France qu'en Corée du Sud. Le principe du « droit de divorcer » une fois admis, cette démarche comparative permet d'autre part, de découvrir que, s'agissant du « droit du divorce », le choix législatif fondamental s'articule autour de deux idées dans les deux systèmes juridiques : diversifier les cas de divorce afin de répondre à la diversité des situations de crise conjugale, et dédramatiser le divorce en incitant les époux à trouver un accord sur les conséquences du divorce. L'approche comparative révèle une fois encore que les règles aboutissent à des solutions souvent proches mais que pour y parvenir, les législateurs respectifs des deux pays ont parfois emprunté des chemins différents / The legal literature let us know that a divorce, very old institution allowing to break the marital relation in a definitive and radical way, is closely linked to the prevailing ideology and political movements of the country. The comparison of legislations in divorce, purpose of our study, allows, on the one hand, to notice the evolution of the “right to divorce” is underlined by successive steps of prohibition of divorce and recovery both in France and in South Korea. The principle of “right to divorce” once accepted, this comparative approach allows on the other hand, to perceive that, regarding “divorce law”, the fundamental legislative choice turns on two ideas in both legal systems : diversify divorce cases to answer the diversity of a marital crisis, and not dramatize divorce encouraging spouses to reach an agreement on the consequences of divorce. The comparative approach reveals once again that the rules often lead to similar solutions but to accomplish goals, sometimes the legislators of the both countries have took different ways

Thesis (M.A.)--Cincinnati Bible Seminary, 2001. / Abstract and vita. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 217-224).