Global ETD Search

1	[pt] A RESPONSABILIDADE CIVIL DOS PRESTADORES DE SERVIÇOS ESSENCIAIS AO FUNDO DE INVESTIMENTO POR DANOS AO COTISTA / [en] THE CIVIL LIABILITY OF PROVIDERS OF ESSENTIAL SERVICES TO THE INVESTMENT FUND FOR DAMAGES TO ITS INVESTORS LEONARDO WORTMANN GHIARONI 16 May 2024 (has links) [pt] O presente estudo tem por objeto examinar as normas regentes da responsabilização civil do administrador e do gestor do fundo de investimento (denominados conjuntamente prestadores de serviços essenciais pela regulação da Comissão de Valores Mobiliários) por danos causados aos seus cotistas, bem como os critérios de análise que devem ser empregados pelo tomador de decisão para determinar tal responsabilidade no caso concreto. Para tanto, a análise aqui empreendida é segmentada nos exames sucessivos sobre (i) a relação jurídica contratual existente entre os cotistas e os prestadores de serviços essenciais, com especial ênfase nos deveres atribuídos a estes e no conteúdo do adimplemento contratual que destes se espera; (ii) a ocorrência e os contornos do inadimplemento dos deveres atribuídos aos prestadores de serviços essenciais à luz das normas que disciplinam a responsabilidade civil destes perante os cotistas; e (iii) os critérios a ser adotados e as questões que necessitam ser enfrentadas pelo julgador para determinar a responsabilidade civil dos prestadores de serviços essenciais perante os cotistas no caso concreto. / [en] This study seeks to examine the norms regarding the civil liability of administrators and managers of investment funds (categorized in the regulatory acts of the Brazilian Securities Commission as essential services providers to the investment fund) for damages caused to the funds investors, as well as the criteria to analyze by the decision maker to determine such liability in concrete cases. For this purpose, the analysis made in this study is segmented in successive investigations regarding (i) the contractual relationship between the funds investors and the essential services providers, with special emphasis on the duties attributed to the latter and in the content of the contractual performance owed by these actors; (ii) the occurrence and characteristics of the contractual breach of the duties attributed to the essential services providers in the context of the norms that discipline the civil liability of these actors for damages caused to the funds investors; and (iii) the criteria to be adopted and the issues to be addressed by the decision maker in order to determine the civil liability of essential services before the funds investors in concrete cases. [pt] FUNDO DE INVESTIMENTO [pt] GESTOR DE CARTEIRA [pt] RESPONSABILIDADE CIVIL [en] INVESTMENT FUND [en] INVESTMENT FUND MANAGER [en] INVESTMENT FUND ADMINISTRATOR [en] LIABILITY
2	La régulation des gestionnaires de hedge funds en droit européen et américain : Enjeux et perspectives. Une étude comparée des régimes juridiques issus de la directive AIFM et du Dodd Franck Act / The regulation of hedge fund advisers under EU and US laws : Challenges and perspectives. An analysis of financial regulation through the prism of the AIFM Directive and the Dodd Franck Act Rivière, Anne 23 June 2017 (has links) Plusieurs trillions de dollars d’actifs sous gestion : tel est le poids de l’industrie des hedge funds dans le système financier. Acteurs indispensables des marchés, les hedge funds sont pourtant des créatures méconnues. Réservés aux investisseurs professionnels ou qualifiés, ils ont longtemps tiré partie d’exemptions et échappé à une trop forte contrainte réglementaire. La crise financière de 2008 a bouleversé ce schéma et fait apparaître, en Europe et aux États-Unis, une même volonté d’encadrer davantage ces structures, par le biais de leurs gestionnaires. Aussi cette étude propose-t-elle une analyse comparée des dispositions introduites en la matière par la directive AIFM et par le Dodd Frank Act. Après un nécessaire éclairage sur cette industrie de l’ombre, elle examine les apports des deux textes, les confronte avant d’en dégager forces et faiblesses. Le traumatisme de la crise a fait émerger un double impératif : mieux protéger les investisseurs et prévenir le risque systémique. C’est à la lumière de ces deux objectifs que la seconde partie s’attarde sur le bien-fondé des réformes, leur portée réelle ainsi que leurs limites. Cette vue d’ensemble de la régulation applicable aux gestionnaires de hedge funds est également prétexte à une réflexion plus large sur la régulation financière, ses finalités, ses contours et ses défis. Nous concluons sur une feuille de route pour un acte II de la directive AIFM et formulons plusieurs propositions, en particulier l’interdiction totale de commercialisation auprès d’investisseurs de détail et la création d’une base de données mondiale du risque systémique. / The hedge fund industry manages several trillion dollars in assets. Though they are key players of the financial system, hedge funds remain mysterious creatures. Available only to professional or qualified investors, they managed, for a long time, to take advantage of exemptions and to avoid a heavy regulatory burden. The 2008 financial crisis profoundly changed perspectives and led the European Union and the United States to introduce new regulations targeting hedge funds, through their managers and advisers. This study is a comparative analysis of such regulations, brought about by the AIFM Directive and the Dodd Frank Act. After a brief overview of the industry, both texts are examined and compared so as to identify their respective strengths and weaknesses. Two imperatives emerged out of the crisis: increasing investor protection and preventing systemic risk. In light of these two objectives, part II discusses the validity of the reforms, their scope and their limits. This extensive analysis of hedge fund regulation also leads to broader remarks on financial regulation, its aims, contours and challenges. Finally, a roadmap for a revised version of the AIFM Directive is proposed and concrete measures are suggested, such as the total prohibition of marketing to retail investors and the creation of a global database of systemic risk. Hedge fund Gestionnaire de FIA AIFM Dodd Frank Act Régulation financière Private fund adviser Risque systémique Protection des investisseurs Harmonisation Convergence Crise financière Effet de levier Agrément Passeport européen Dépositaire Compliance Reporting Supervision Base de données SEC ESMA France Italie États-Unis Hedge fund Alternative investment fund manager AIFM Dodd Frank Act Financial regulation Private fund adviser Systemic risk Investor protection Harmonization Convergence Financial crisis Leverage EU passport Depositary Compliance Reporting Supervision Database SEC ESMA France Italy United States

Search results

[pt] A RESPONSABILIDADE CIVIL DOS PRESTADORES DE SERVIÇOS ESSENCIAIS AO FUNDO DE INVESTIMENTO POR DANOS AO COTISTA / [en] THE CIVIL LIABILITY OF PROVIDERS OF ESSENTIAL SERVICES TO THE INVESTMENT FUND FOR DAMAGES TO ITS INVESTORS