Spelling suggestions: "subject:"[een] JEWISH PHILOSOPHY"" "subject:"[enn] JEWISH PHILOSOPHY""
1 |
Gersonides on the CategoriesSinyor, Alan January 1989 (has links)
No description available.
|
2 |
Franz Rosenzweig and scripture /Benjamin, Mara H. January 2005 (has links)
Thesis (Ph. D.)--Stanford University, 2005. / Includes bibliographical references. Also available on the Internet.
|
3 |
The idea of progress in Philo JudaeusBoughton, Jesse Scott, January 1932 (has links)
Thesis (Ph. D.)--Columbia University, 1932. / Vita. Bibliography: p. 227-278.
|
4 |
Dialektikah verharmoniyah betefisot hahistoryah vehameshihiyut shel ha-Rav KookLubitch, Ronen January 1993 (has links)
Added title page in English: Dialectics and harmony in the concepts of history and messianism of Rav Kook. / This essay will attempt to examine Rav Kook's corpus of thought from the viewpoint of its systems of methodological foundations: dialectic and harmonistic. These two elements are the dominant components of his thought, both from the methodological and ontological aspects. As to the harmonistic element, it should be noted that Rav Kook's entire corpus of thought is stamped with the idea of monistic unity, and he believes in the unity of existence from the point of view of ontological monism. The monism is inherent even in the center of the theoretical method, or in the words of Rav Kook: "The various thoughts actually don't contradict each other, everything is but a unitary revelation which appears in different sparks".
|
5 |
Understanding religious language : an integrated approach to meaning /Sandel, Margaret Anne. January 2002 (has links)
Thesis (Ph. D.)--Graduate Theological Union, 2002. / Includes bibliographical references (p. 269-273). Also available on the Internet.
|
6 |
Maimonides' sons episodes in modern Jewish thought /LaGrone, Matthew. Kavka, Martin. January 2003 (has links)
Thesis (M.A.)--Florida State University, 2003. / Advisor: Dr. Martin Kavka, Florida State University, College of Arts and Sciences, Dept. of Religion. Title and description from dissertation home page (viewed Apr. 7, 2004). Includes bibliographical references.
|
7 |
Philo of Alexandria and the Timaeus of PlatoRunia, Douwe T. January 1983 (has links)
Thesis (doctoral)--Vrije Universiteit te Amsterdam, 1983. / Summary in Dutch. Includes indexes. Includes bibliographical references (p. [555]-569).
|
8 |
Philo of Alexandria and the Timaeus of PlatoRunia, Douwe T. January 1983 (has links)
Thesis (doctoral)--Vrije Universiteit te Amsterdam, 1983. / Summary in Dutch. Includes indexes. Includes bibliographical references (p. [555]-569).
|
9 |
Mishnato shel Rabi Zeraḥyah ben Yitsḥaḳ ben Sheʻaltiʼel Ḥen ṿehe-hagut ha-maimonit-tibonit ba-meʼah ha-13Ravitzky, Aviezer. January 1900 (has links)
Thesis--ha-Universiṭah ha-ʻivrit bi-Yerushalayim. / Added t.p.: The thought of R. Zerahiah b. Isaac b. Shealtiel Hen & the Maimonidean-Tibbonian philosophy of the 13th century. Includes English summary. Bibliography: leaves 293-301.
|
10 |
A comprehensive analysis of reward and punishment in the Rabbinical literature of the middle agesGreenberger, David Simon 11 1900 (has links)
This dissertation concentrates on those factors which form the doctrine of G-dly reward
and punishment. In other words, the philosophical approach amongst Jewish thinkers
from the Middle Ages to the above subject, which taken together give expression to the
doctrine of reward and ptmishment, or at least to the possibility of determining such a
doctrine. The definition of correct behaviour is not of interest for pwposes of this
dissertation, nor is human judgement of behaviour, even according to a G-dly doctrine;
only the A-lmighty's judgement and implementation thereof
The following points are of note.
Research into the specific approach of one individual philosopher is not the aim of this
dissertation, but rather a collective crystallised viewpoint according to various different
Jewish philosophers, in order to reach a harmonious formation of the desir~ goal. Hence
the details are also important since they assist towards the goal.
The views of the philsophers are of interest and not their source, viz. from whom these
views were received or by whom the philosophers were influenced, as is usually the case
in research. Nevertheless, this aspect is elaborated upon in the introduction to this
dissertation, in the style of the customary academic research approach.
An analytical comparison is made between the opinions of various authors, taking into
account the finer points of their words, as well as between the differing opinions expressed
by a single author in his various writings, and conclusions are drawn, the results of which
are highly significant.
Besides the fact that it is not within our power to adjudicate between the views of the
great Jewish thinkers, this is even more true here, due to the metaphysical nature of the
subject, which makes logical, rational-realistic judgement very difficult. Nevertheless,
some criteria have been established for making such a decision.
In summary, this dissertation is an attempt to research many diverse opinions in the
treasury of Jewish thought from the Middle Ages, and to extract those opinions from
which a complete system of the doctrine of reward and punishment can be built. / Religious Studies and Arabic / D.Litt et Phil. (Judaica)
|
Page generated in 0.036 seconds