No description available.

This research investigates flood-risk communication challenges in Canada, emphasizing the need for tailored strategies to address diverse household preferences and values. In Chapter 2, we examine Canadian household experiences with flood-risk information, aiming to identify new communication needs and bridge the gap between households and flood-risk managers. The interviews reveal previously overlooked flood risk information needs. The importance of tailored communication strategies was highlighted by household participants as they emphasized the need for information that caters to their unique circumstances and requirements. Moreover, fairness emerged as a crucial aspect of flood-risk communication, prompting a call for equitable practices to address vulnerabilities affecting specific households. In Chapter 3, we investigate household values and preferences on flood-risk information through a survey of at-risk households in Canada, uncovering diverse preferences, values and needs for tailored risk information. Additionally, significant differences in flood-risk knowledge, accessibility, and transparency are observed among risk-status groups, with higher awareness among those who perceive themselves at risk. Overall, this research emphasizes the importance of understanding diverse values and preferences within households regarding flood-risk information. Strengthening flood-risk communication strategies and addressing information gaps can lead to more informed risk perceptions and improve awareness among at-risk households in Canada / Thesis / Master of Arts (MA) / This research focuses on how people in Canada receive information about flood risks and how we can improve it. In Chapter 2, we talked to Canadian households to learn about their experiences with flood-risk information. We found that the current way of giving this information might not meet everyone's needs. People want information that fits their specific situations, and they stressed the importance of fairness in how the information is shared. In Chapter 3, we conducted a survey among households at risk of flooding in Canada to find out what kind of information they prefer. We discovered that people like to get clear and direct messages with detailed risk information that is customized for them. We also noticed that some people who think they are at higher risk of flooding are more informed about the risks. This means it's essential to consider how people see their own risk levels when communicating with them effectively. Overall, this research shows that flood-risk information needs to be tailored to people's different preferences and values. By doing this, we can help individuals and communities better understand and prepare for flood risks. We recommend working together with different groups involved in flood-risk management to improve how we communicate these risks. By doing so, we can create a more informed and inclusive flood-risk communication system that helps communities stay safe during flood events in the future.

Electric bikes can contribute to the decrease of emissions and present a carbon-positive alternative to gaspowered forms of motorized transport. Hence, the fact that both conventional and e-bike use have increased considerably during the Covid-19 pandemic can be considered as a positive development. At the same time, studies find that e-bike riders are traveling with higher speeds, and report new types of safety incidents, that they did not experience during conventional cycling. Risk related behavior of e-bike and c-bike riders has frequently been linked to crash-risk and injury severity [6][7]. But little research has been conducted on the comparison of self-reported risk related behavior between e-bike and conventional bike (c-bike) riders. Hence, in this study, the self-reported risk-related behavior of c-bik.e and e-bike riders was investigated.

It is commonly assumed that when confronted with an imminent hazard that people will react rationally, and prepare for, or at least attempt to avoid, danger from pending disasters. However, this conventional wisdom is not as evident as it appears. People prepare for, react to, or take social action to avoid hazards when they perceive the risk of danger to be threatening enough to warrant action, providing one has the will, insight and resources to do so. However, not all people perceive risks similarly. Risk is perceived differently by different people which affects risk perception and responses to hazards. This dissertation explores the relationships between American Indian worldviews, risk perceptions and disaster planning. To carry out this research 28 American Indians were interviewed. The sample consists of 14 American Indians residing in a rural are on the northern plains and 14 urban American Indians. The results only partially support that worldview is linked to risk perception and subsequent disaster planning. Other factors found to relate to risk perception and disaster planning for this non-representative sample of American Indians include various forms of social vulnerability.

<p>  </p> <p>Pregnancy poses unjust dangers to Black women in the United States, who are currently faced with higher rates of maternal mortality and pregnancy-related adverse events than women of other races. The maternal mortality ratio for non-Hispanic Black women is 41.4/100,000 compared with 13.7/100,000 for White women (Hill et al., 2022). Although there are available statistics and other forms on expert knowledge on these dangers, risk perceptions and related behaviors are derived from subjective individual interpretations within a dynamic communicative context. While there is extensive evidence on the dangers pregnancy and childbirth pose to Black women, less is known about Black women’s conceptualizations of their own risks, the role of communication (with their healthcare providers and other sources), and the ways in which they enact agency in response to these risks. Using a multi-methodological approach that draws on in-depth interviews, qualitative network analysis and an environmental scan, this dissertation foregrounds Black women’s own narratives to explore the social construction of pregnancy risk, the role of communication with healthcare providers in the amplification or attenuation of these risks, and the broader communicative context that shapes Black women’s pregnancy experiences. In doing so, this study found that Black women’s pregnancy risk perceptions are socially constructed through communication in a socio-political context shaped by gendered racism, and Black women enacted agency in response to these risks in a variety of ways constrained by gendered racism, including intentional decision-making, extensive research, and self-advocacy. Insights from in-depth interviews and the qualitative network analysis were contextualized in an environmental scan that included a review of relevant policies, interviews with community leaders, and a review of community organizations efforts to support Black women. This dissertation concludes with a discussion of contributions to theory and insights for Black women, healthcare providers, community organizations, media and policy makers. </p>

No description available.

No description available.

No description available.

No description available.

Natural hazards, paired with affected communities’ exposure and vulnerability, have caused numerousfatalities and great economic losses worldwide in recent decades. Floods represent about one-third ofall natural hazards, and together with storms they comprise 77% of economic losses caused byextreme weather events from 1980 to 2006 in Europe and have been the main natural hazards inEurope for more than a century. Survey data of public risk perception were collected in Sweden andItaly through online surveys several times during the COVID-19 pandemic, and the respondents wereasked questions about risk perception regarding nine threats: epidemics, floods, droughts, earthquakes,wildfires, terror attacks, domestic violence, economic crises, and climate change. The survey explorespublic perception on five factors: experience, likelihood, potential impact, as well as preparedness andknowledge of the phenomenon. The survey data were analysed by using ordinal logistic regression,were the variable of previous flood experience along with socioeconomic factors were used to explorehow/if previous experience has any statistical significance and potentially affects risk perception. Inaddition, this thesis also presents a spatial analysis of respondents’ previous flood experience andprevious flood events in Sweden, to explore whether this is reflected in the survey data. The resultsshow that the effect of experience on likelihood, knowledge and preparedness is high, and womenhave a higher perceived risk in all variables except preparedness. The results of the spatial analysisshow that the majority of respondents with experience live in North Middle Sweden which correlateswell with the analysis of past flood events during the recent decade. These findings could potentiallybe used in continuous research regarding disaster risk reduction and developing frameworks,specifically how impacts and perception influence other variables such as vulnerability, behaviour, andgovernance.