• Refine Query
  • Source
  • Publication year
  • to
  • Language
  • 1
  • Tagged with
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • About
  • The Global ETD Search service is a free service for researchers to find electronic theses and dissertations. This service is provided by the Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations.
    Our metadata is collected from universities around the world. If you manage a university/consortium/country archive and want to be added, details can be found on the NDLTD website.
1

[en] WHY DO BRAZILIAN BANK-AFFILIATED MUTUAL FUNDS UNDERPERFORM? / [pt] POR QUE FUNDOS DE AÇÕES BRASILEIROS FILIADOS À BANCOS TÊM PERFORMANCE DIFERENTE DE FUNDOS INDEPENDENTES?

POMPEU HOFFMANN JUNIOR 22 August 2018 (has links)
[pt] Esse artigo investiga a participação de fundos filiados a conglomerados financeiros na indústria brasileira. Usando dados de 2002 a 2016, mostramos que fundos filiados a bancos apresentam retornos, entre 1.96 por cento-2.30 por cento ao ano, inferior a fundos independentes. Além disso, mostramos que gestores de fundos filiados a bancos têm menos incentivos a tomar risco no mercado do que gestores de fundos independentes. Consistente com os incentivos enfrentados, mostramos que fundos filiados a bancos mudam menos de posição, tentam menos antecipar movimentos de mercado e têm portfólios mais parecidos com o mercado do que fundos independentes. Finalmente, mostramos que as diferenças na tomada de risco pode estar associada a 7.68 por cento-29.6 por cento da diferença de performance entre fundos filiados à bancos e independentes. / [en] This paper investigates financial conglomerates participation in the Brazilian equity mutual fund industry. Using data from 2002 to 2016, we show that bank-affiliated funds underperform funds managed by stand-alone entities by 1.96 percent-2.30 percent per year. Moreover, we find that bank-affiliated fund managers have less incentives to take risk than independent funds. Consistent with incentives, we show that bank-affiliated funds trade less often, try less to time the market and have portfolios more similar to the market s than independent funds. Finally, we show that differences in risk taking can be associated to 7.68-29.6 percent of the performance difference between bank-affiliated and independent funds.

Page generated in 0.0272 seconds