• Refine Query
  • Source
  • Publication year
  • to
  • Language
  • 13
  • 10
  • 3
  • Tagged with
  • 13
  • 13
  • 13
  • 13
  • 6
  • 4
  • 4
  • 3
  • 3
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • About
  • The Global ETD Search service is a free service for researchers to find electronic theses and dissertations. This service is provided by the Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations.
    Our metadata is collected from universities around the world. If you manage a university/consortium/country archive and want to be added, details can be found on the NDLTD website.
11

中央與地方政府間關係與政策執行--台北市取締違章工廠的個案分析

喻銘鐸, YU, MING-DUO Unknown Date (has links)
七○年代以來,政策執行的研究愈來愈趨興盛,學者們或從行動的觀點論述,或從組 織的面向探討,但鮮有從中央與地方政府間關係(Intergover-nmental Relations) 的角度研究。事實上,政策方案的研行,或多或少都涉及政府間的合作、溝通、與協 調。大如環保政策的推動,小至違章建築的拆除,莫不經由中央規劃與地方執行的過 程。因此,本文的目的,旨在建之一政府間政策執行的概念架構,並透過台北市取締 違章工廠的個案,為觀察與解釋的對象,期望能為我國未來中央與地方共同執行政策 所遭遇的困境,提出一條可行的解決途徑。 全文共五章,約六萬餘言。 第一章:緒論;首先界定相關名詞,再述及所欲探討的問題,並檢討研究現狀,以及 研究所採用的方法,最後分析研究架構。 第二章:政策資源與目標:分析執行所需資源的分配情形,以及政策目標是否明確, 目標要求改變的程度如何? 第三章:中央的政策系絡因素:探討中央政府如何透過溝通與地方政府協調,並且提 供何種誘因,促使地方政府執行。對於地方政府執行的監督,如何有效的達成。 第四章:地方的政策系絡因素:主要探討地方執行人員的心理意向,標的團體的態度 ,地方執行機構的特性,以及地方的經濟、社會條件。 第五章:結論:分析研究結果,歸納出結論,並進而提供建議,俾供參考。
12

建立衡量跨組織系統績效之量化架構 / BUILD THE QUANTITATIVE FRAMEWORK TO MEASURE THE PERFORMANCE OF INTER-ORGANIZATIONAL SYSTEMS

曾菁美, Tseng,Ching Mei Unknown Date (has links)
跨組織系統(IOS)是一種由兩間或多間企業所共同使用的自動化資訊系統。有越來越多的企業利用跨組織系統來推動企業間的合作互動,因此,如何衡量跨組織系統所產出的績效便是相當重要的課題。本研究主要是提供一個量化的方式來衡量跨組織系統,不單只著重衡量企業內部,同時也將外部的供應商部份納入考量。最後,本研究以一間台灣的PC製造商作為分析個案,針對此個案做事後分析,印證本研究所提出的量化架構。 / IOS (Inter-Organizational Systems) is defined as automated information systems shared by two or more companies. While more and more enterprises use IOS to promote the collaboration between companies, what kinds of values are derived from IOS and how to evaluate these IOS become important to enterprises. This research aims to provide a quantitative approach to measure IOS values, not only considering the benefits within internal enterprise, but also paying attention to those from external processes with suppliers. We try to propose a new evaluated model. In order to justify our framework, we take one Taiwanese PC manufacturer as a case and do the post-hoc analysis. Through the case study, we prove that our model is validated. We propose new four perspectives in our IOS quantitative framework: IT infrastructure perspective, internal business process perspective, business supplier perspective and business performance. Afterwards, we try to determine the processes in each perspective according to perspectives and then find the quantitative indicators to support our measurement. Lastly, we can even calculate the return on investment (ROI) and break-even point that make enterprises can know the IOS operation more clearly. Therefore, the contribution of this research can be two-folded: first, enterprises can build an IOS quantitative framework to evaluate both intra-firm and inter-firm IOS values quantitatively. Second, enterprises can exactly know how the IOS work, inclusive of detailed processes and interactions with suppliers and how many investment and rewards that enterprises really get.
13

台灣蔬果類農產品商業創新模式之研究 / Study on Taiwan Business Innovation Model of Agricultural Products

黃群益, Huang, Chun Yi Unknown Date (has links)
台灣為了提昇總體的競爭力,將精緻農業訂為重要的經濟發展策略,期望由政府帶頭,創造下一波的產業契機。台灣的農業技術世界聞名,農民平均的栽種面積約一公頃,屬於小農制的國家,目前藉由成立區域性產銷班組織的方式來整合農戶,雖然可以降低成本及擴大產量,但並無法有效的解決產銷問題,因此導致農業的發展受到限制,產銷問題的發生在於產銷雙方缺乏企業化的整合者而導致資訊的不對稱,本研究希望能藉由對國內外蔬果類農產品產銷組織個案與國內農產品創新個案的分析,研擬台灣蔬果類農產品建立產銷商業創新營運模式的可行性及其策略。 本研究利用企業網絡關係 (S, Stakeholder Network)、關鍵資產 (P, Property Right)、活動能力 (A, Activity Capabilities)、市場結構 (M, Market Structure),四個層面來分析國內現行蔬果類農產品的產銷體系個案,專業有機生產班、綜合經營班、集運中心,歸納出目前台灣農業發展的機會點與問題點,再與國外內產銷創新個案,包括:南加州果農合作社、紐西蘭奇異果營銷局、美國都樂公司、金三角蔬果運銷合作社、微熱山丘、佳美食品公司,進行個案綜合比較與分析,找出適合台灣蔬果類農產品的商業創新營運模式。 本研究發現:(1) 產銷組織之產權網絡關係會影響產銷市場的結構,透過產權的鏈結可以擴大農企業的競爭優勢;(2) 農企業的以整合者的定位有助於解決產銷雙方資訊不對稱的問題;(3) 農企業必需要行銷為導向來建構生產管理系統,能有效解決產銷問題;(4) 農企業必需以品牌與附加價值來增進企業獲利營運模式。 / In order to enhance Taiwan's overall competitiveness, let exquisite agricultural become an important economic development strategy. Hoping the government to take the lead, create the next wave of industry opportunities. Taiwan's agricultural technology is world known; farmers planted an average area of one hectare, considered small-scale farming system. Currently organized by the establishment of regional production and marketing approach to integrate farmers, although it could reduce costs and expand production, but not effectively solve production and marketing issues, therefore the development of agriculture is limited. Production and marketing issue occurs when both production and marketing were the lack of integration of enterprise which led to information uncoordinated. This study hopes by analyzing domestic and international produce production cases and marketing organization innovative. Develop Taiwanese produce production and marketing of agricultural products to establish the feasibility of commercial and business model innovation strategies. In this study, enterprise networking (S, Stakeholder Network), the key assets (P, Property Right), activity (A, Activity Capabilities), market structure (M, Market Structure), four dimension to the analyze domestic produce production and marketing system individual case, the professional organic production class, integrated management class, Cargo Center, summed up the current point of Taiwan's agricultural development opportunities and issues. within the production and marketing innovation with foreign cases, including: California Fruit Growers Exchange & Sunkist, Zespri International, Dole Company ,Goldern Triangle Company, Sunnyhill Incorporated, Chia Meei Food Group to conduct a comprehensive comparison and analysis of the cases, identify suitable business innovation business model for Taiwan's agricultural products.. The study found that: (1) network marketing organization of the property sales market will affect the relationship between the structure of the network can be extended through the property the competitive advantage of agricultural enterprises; (2) agricultural enterprises to integrate the positioning of both production and marketing to help solve the problem of information uncoordinated (3)agricultural enterprises must market build production-oriented management system, it can effectively solve the sales problem; (4) agricultural enterprises need to brand and value-added business model to enhance corporate profits.

Page generated in 0.2877 seconds