摘 要 本研究旨在探討不同背景之國小教師，對於國民小學實施電子書包之相關意見以及教學應用模式的需求情形。本研究採便利取樣方式，選取桃園縣20所公立國民小學之全校教師為調查研究對象，進行問卷調查，樣本總計有761名，回收有效問卷共計719份。並以百分比與次數分配、單因子變異數分析、獨立樣本t考驗和卡方考驗等統計方式分析處理相關資料。調查研究重要結果如下： 一、國小教師認為支持實施電子書包最重要的理由是「培養學生運用現代化科技、資訊的能力」以及「提供較傳統教學更快速、便捷、多元與可重複性的學習資源服務」。 二、國小教師認為電子書包最適合的教學型態是「電子書包搭配教學」及「電子書包輔助教學」。而電子書包最適合實施的年段則是「高年級」。 三、國小教師認為電子書包最適合的重量是「1500∼1001公克」或「1000∼501公克」。最適合的螢幕大小是「11-15英吋」。而最適合的價位是「10000-5001元」或「5000元以下」。 四、國小教師認為，目前實施電子書包最有利的因素是「電腦及資訊網際網路日益普及，已能符合國小學童的能力使用」。而最不利的因素則是「電子書包的價格昂貴，大多數家長無法負擔」。 五、國小教師認為，「同步電子筆記教學應用模式」最適合的是「社會學習領域」及「語文學習領域」；「同步解題教學應用模式」最適合的是「數學學習領域」；「分組專題簡報教學應用模式」最適合的是「社會學習領域」、「自然與生活科技學習領域」以及「語文學習領域」；而「班級閱讀教學應用模式」最適合的是「語文學習領域」及「社會學習領域」。 六、不同背景之國小教師對於電子書包的支持度、適合的教學型態、重量、螢幕大小、價位、實施年段以及適合的教學應用模式等，大多有顯著差異存在。 另本研究根據研究結果提出數點建議以供參考。 關鍵詞：電子書包、高互動教室、網路教學、傳統教學 / Feasibility Study on the Implementation of Electronic Schoolbag based on Elementary School Teachers’ Opinions. Liu-Chin Hu Abstract The research is mainly to explore relevant opinions and the needs in the applied teaching mode of elementary school teachers with different backgrounds regarding the implementation of electronic schoolbags in elementary schools. This research utilized an convenient sample selection method by choosing all teachers within Taoyuan County’s 20 public elementary schools as research subjects. There were a total of 761 samples and 719 effective questionnaires were received. Statistical analysis using percentage and frequency distribution, one-way ANOVA, independent-sample t-test and χ2 test were conducted to analyze relevant data. The main results of this research were as follows： 1. Elementary school teachers believed that the main reason for supporting electronic schoolbag implementation was to “cultivate students’ usage of modern technology and information technology ability” as well as to “provide more rapid, convenient, multi-varied and repeatable learning resource services”. 2. Elementary school teachers believed that the most appropriate teaching style in the electronic schoolbag mode was to “match the electronic schoolbag with teaching” and to utilize “the electronic schoolbag to assist teaching”; and the most appropriate implementation stage for electronic schoolbags was in “higher grade levels”. 3. Elementary school teachers believed that the most appropriate weight of electronic schoolbags was “1,001~1,500 grams” or “501~1,000 grams”; the most appropriate display screen size was “11-15 inches”; and the most appropriate cost was “5,001-10,000 dollars” or “under 5,000 dollars”. 4. Elementary school teachers believed that the most advantageous factor for implementing electronic schoolbags now was “computers and the information technology of the Internet are becoming more common each day and are already in accordance to elementary school kids’ ability to use them”; and the main disadvantage was due to the “expensive cost of electronic schoolbags in which most families cannot afford them”. 5. Elementary school teachers believed that “synchronizing electronic notebook applied teaching mode” was most appropriate for “societal learning territory” and “language learning territory”; “synchronizing problem solving applied teaching mode” was most appropriate for “mathematical learning territory”; “team project presentation applied teaching mode” was most appropriate for “societal learning territory”, “natural science and life technology learning territory” and “language learning territory”; and “class reading applied teaching mode” was most appropriate for “language learning territory” and “societal learning territory”. 6. Based on different elementary teachers’ backgrounds, there were significant differences in elementary teachers’ opinions on their support for electronic schoolbags, appropriate teaching mode, weight, display screen size, cost, implementation stage and appropriate applied teaching mode. In addition, this research proposed several recommendations based on the research results for reference. Keywords：Electronic schoolbag, high interaction schoolroom, Web-based Instruction and traditional teaching.

過去已有不少文獻比較傳統教學與遠距教學學習成效之異同，然而大部分研究都著重於探討學習效果差異，但是對於因為不同授課方法學生學習投入不同所產生之學習認知差異部分則尚無研究加以探討。因此本研究嘗試從學生學習的過程（投入）與學習的成效（滿意度）及不同授課方法是否對學習認知有所影響，來探討傳統教學遠遠距教學之差異。Adam（1963）所提公平理論認為一般人會同時考慮自己的投入與產出（報酬），與別人之投入與產出相比較，如果比率類似則在心理上會覺得的公平，反之則覺得不公平，不過公平理論並無具體提出如何加以衡量這些「感覺」。本研究採用公平理論觀念，整合資料包絡分析法建構出學習認知公平的綜合指標，並以此指標探討不同授課方式學習認知之差異。 實證結果發現在課程滿意度方面，學生對於遠距教學方式提供方便且有彈性的學習活動和多樣化的學習內容感到滿意；在課程參與度方面，遠距教學環境可提高學生發問的意願，並有助於學生在課程中提出問題；在認知公平方面，單變量實證結果顯示在不同授課方式下，學生在課程中增加一單位投入對滿意度增加程度有顯著差異，但控制可能會對不同授課方式產生影響之變數後，結果顯示不同授課方式對於學習認知公平無顯著差異。