本研究針對澎湖縣馬公市三十四位國小五年級學童，進行五週標註系統輔助不同模糊容忍度學童進行英語閱讀學習的課程，旨在透過標註系統探討不同模糊容忍度之國小學童，在標註系統使用表現上的差異，以及使用標註後標註行為與閱讀成效的改變。 本研究蒐集了量化與質性的資料，量化的資料方面，以第二語言模糊容忍度量表、全國兒童暨青少年英語分級檢定之文章與測驗，與政大圖資所「數位圖書館暨數位學習實驗室」所開發的Glias閱讀標註系統為工具，獲得教學實驗資料進行統計分析；質性資料方面，係透過課堂討論學習單與半結構式訪談，獲得資料並進行分析。茲將主要研究發現分述如下： 一、標註系統有助於提升學習者的英語閱讀成績，特別有助於模糊容忍度低的學習者。 二、透過開放式標註，不同模糊容忍度學習者在部分類型標註與總標註數量上都顯著地減少，尤其是模糊容忍度中與低的學習者。 三、透過開放式標註，整體學生在個人意見的標註數量上顯著地增加。 四、不同模糊容忍度的學習者在開放式標註系統的標註字數與被投票數的表現上有所差異，但經過兩次開放式標註系統的使用後則無顯著差異。 五、不同模糊容忍度的學習者最喜歡建立也覺得最有用的都是解釋類型的標註，但不同模糊容忍度的學習者喜歡的理由各異。 六、模糊容忍度不同的學習者瀏覽時最喜愛的標註類型不同。 七、在兩次開放式標註下，不再是標註數量或標註字數多，分數才高。 八、重點提醒的標註寫得越好的學習者，其英語閱讀測驗成績越高。 九、模糊容忍度各組中進步最多者都善加應用標註系統的優勢。 十、多數學生對開放式標註系統輔助英語閱讀持肯定態度。 基於上述研究結果，本研究亦針對實務教學者與後續研究提出相關建議。 / This research focused on studying 34 elementary grade 5 students at Magong City, Penghu County and proceed five weeks of classes on students’ with different tolerance of ambiguity in English reading study through the assistance of annotation system. The purpose is to learn the differences on the students studying performance through the assistance of annotation system on students with different tolerance of ambiguity and the changes of reading result and annotating behavior after using the annotation system. This research collected a lot of quantitative and qualitative data, in terms of quantitative data, there are second language tolerance of ambiguity scale chart, the general English proficiency tests’ articles and tests for children and teenagers, and the statistical analysis gathered using the Glias reading annotation system tool developed by NCCU Graduate Institute of Library, Information and Archival Studies’ “digital library and digital learning laboratory.”; in terms of qualitative data are data and statistics gathered through class discussion and semi-structured interviews. A summary of the key findings are: 1. Annotation system effectively increases the English reading scores for students especially with low tolerance of ambiguity. 2. Through open annotation labeling, different students with different tolerance of ambiguity effectively reduced some types and the total numbers of annotation labeling, especially for students with medium and low tolerance of ambiguity. 3. Through open annotation labeling, the number of labeling in students personal opinion have increased. 4. Students with different level of tolerance of ambiguity have different performance in terms of the number of open annotation labeling system and the number of system that were voted, but after using open annotation system for two times, there were little differences. 5. Students with different level of tolerance of ambiguity like to establish and also think the most useful annotation labeling is the explanation types, but their reason for liking the system varies. 6. The favrorite browsing type of annotation labeling for students with different level of tolerance of ambiguity varies. 7. After two open annotation labeling, the score doesn’t increase when there are more annotation labeling. 8. The better annotation labeling for the main point is related to the higher score on the English reading test. 9. In different groups of students of different level of tolerance of ambiguity, the students that improve the most are students who know how to use the annotation system to its advantage. 10. Most students agreed that open annotation system is effective in assisting reading English articles. In conclusion, this research will also propose related suggestions to practice educators and the follow-up studies.