本研究探討的是楊淑君被取消資格事件，發生在2010年11月17日。基於框架理論背景，研究的目的是探索新聞平面媒體如何使用框架來報導楊淑君事件。具體來說，本研究旨在探討不同國家的新聞報導框架差異。 本研究使用自2010年11月18日起至12月17日止的相關事件新聞報導作為樣本，進行台灣與韓國的報導框架比較。台灣蘋果日報和自由時報有150則相關新聞文章，而韓國的相關新聞文章只有28篇。 本研究發現，台灣媒體所使用的主要框架為責任框架，而韓國媒體所使用的框架為情感框架。台灣的主要新聞消息來源為台灣政府，而韓國新聞消息來源主要來自於台灣媒體。 / This research studies the framing and its application to the Yang Shu-chun disqualification incident, which happened in November 17, 2010. Based on the theoretical background of Framing, this study aims at exploring how the news print media framed one of the recent controversies between Taiwan and Korea, Yang Shu-chun disqualification. Specifically, this tried to see how different each country’s news coverage framed it and how different they used news sources. A comparative case study is conducted with the news stories regarding the incident from November 18, 2010 to December 17, 2010 in Taiwan and Korea. Because of the large difference of the number of the articles between Taiwan and Korea, only two Taiwanese newspapers, the Taiwan Apple Daily and the Liberty Times, are selected among many papers, while Korean news articles are chosen all. They are 150 stories and 28 stories respectively. This research finds that Taiwan media used the responsibility frame most while Korean one did the human interest frame. Both have the majority of episodic frames. As of the news sources, Taiwan’s papers used the news source from Taiwanese government, while Korean ones mostly used Taiwan’s media source. Taiwan used diverse sources from Taiwan side but Korea heavily depended on foreign sources. News coverage with the source of politicians has a tendency of having political consequences framing.