1 |
「女性研究 」文獻之書目計量學研究 / A Bibliometric Study of Women's Studies Literature李家寧, Li, Chia Ning Unknown Date (has links)
本研究旨在應用書目計量學方法分析1900年至2013年間,女性研究文獻之特性,藉以探討女性研究之發展情形。研究樣本取自WOS資料庫(包含三個子資料庫SSCI、SCIE和A&HCI),計16,852篇相關書目資料。期望本研究結果能提供女性研究學界與圖書館或資料單位參考,協助其做有效之館藏規劃及期刊資訊服務。
本研究結果歸納如下:(1) 女性研究文獻篇數與年代是成正比的狀況,較符合指數成長模式。進一步以指數迴歸預測成長篇數的話,顯示女性研究文獻有成長減緩的趨勢。(2)女性研究文獻之主要出版國為美國、英國、加拿大、荷蘭、德國等國。 (3)英文為女性研究文獻最重要之寫作語文。(4)女性研究文獻之出版類型以期刊文章為主,佔總文獻之62.86%。(5)女性研究廣泛應用於各學科,主題領域前五名分別為心理學相關、女性研究(狹義)、歷史、文學及教育與教育研究。 (6) 女性研究之文獻分布相當分散,但仍有其核心期刊。(7)本研究符合布萊德福定律,但不符合布萊德福-齊夫定律曲線。(8) 高生產力期刊與高被引期刊的主題明顯分散。 (10) 洛卡定律、普萊斯平方根定律、80/20 定律不適用於本研究。(11) 研究機構的生產力分散,大學校院為主要研究機構,機構下的系所分布以心理學系所最多。(12) 美國與英國為相關研究機構最多的國家,也是延攬他國學術成果的最多的國家。
本研究最後依據研究發現之結果,提出以下建議:(1)本研究之各項研究成果,可作為圖書資訊界館藏發展與管理之參考。(2)女性研究相關研究人員,應具備跨主題領域的合作研究能力且法文、德文、西班牙文等外語能力。(4)資料庫公司應提升書目資料精確性,以利研究。(5)定期對女性研究文獻進行分析,有助於女性研究相關研究人員瞭解該領域之研究發展。 / The purpose of the study is to understand the contents, relations, development, and trends between various disciplines of “women’s studies.” This study analyzes the characteristics of women’s studies literature during 1900-2013 by bibliometric approach, collecting analytical components such as the frequencies of the publication, publication languages, countries of publications, journal sources, cited times, disciplines of subject categories and document type from three major sub-databases of Web of Science services: SCIE, SSCI, and A&HCI. A total of 16,852 bibliographic records were retrieved from the databases.
The results of the present study are as follows. (1) The growth pattern of women’s studies literature during 1900-2013 generally fits exponential growth, but the growth has been slowed down since 2011. (2) United States, United Kingdom, Canada, Netherlands and Germany are five major countries of women’s studies publications. (3) English is the most often used language. (4) Journal articles are the major type of women’s studies publications, accounting for 62.86% of total publications. (5) Women’s studies are scattered in multiple disciplines, with five subjects significantly contributing to the literature count: psychology and its related disciplines, women’s studies (in narrow definition), history, literature, and education and educational research. (6) Despite of the scattered distribution of women’s studies literature, core journals of women’s studies still can be identified. (7)The distribution of journal articles fits Bradford Law, but it does not fit the typical Bradford-Zipf’s S-shaped curve. (8) The journal subjects of highly productive journals and highly cited journals vary. (9) Author distribution is counted by single authorship and collaborative authorship; the results show that author distribution neither fits Lotka’s law, Square Root Law or 80/20 Rule. (10) Academic institutions are major producers of women’s studies, with departments in universities and colleges concerning psychology and its related disciplines being the main contributors to the publications. (11) Most productive research institutions are distributed over United States, United Kingdom, Canada, Australia and Turkey.
The findings of the study may provide better understanding of the past, current and future of women’s studies, and serve as references to identify more suitable, popular and influential journals and literature for both research purposes and library collection development and management.
|
Page generated in 0.0231 seconds