本研究以擇定之檢索策略，自ERIC資料庫取得38,230筆領導主題文獻，利用書目計量分析方法，探討ERIC資料庫時間範圍是「最早至2009年」之領導主題文獻特性，包括文獻之年代、語言、教育階段、出版類型，以及適合讀者的分布；再以布萊德福定律和布萊德福─齊夫定律圖解，驗證領導主題期刊文獻的分布情形，並分析領導主題核心期刊之特色；最後統計核心期刊1980年至2009年間刊載的文章中，於摘要明顯提及的領導理論或名詞，以找出新近領導主題的研究焦點，進而掌握未來領導研究的趨勢。 根據研究結果與分析，本研究之研究結論歸納如下： 一、領導主題文獻呈現穩定成長，其成長模式為指數模式。 二、英文是領導主題文獻的主要使用語言。 三、中小學教育乃是領導主題文獻最為關注的教育階段。 四、研究報告為領導主題文獻的主要傳播媒介。 五、實踐者是領導主題文獻最主要的適合讀者。 六、領導主題期刊文獻分布不符合布萊德福定律，但與布萊德福─齊夫定律圖解法相符，求得之核心期刊共有十三種。 七、核心期刊有出版國家和學科主題集中的情形。 八、教學領導、分散領導、教師領導、轉型領導、道德領導，以及交易領導為新近領導主題的焦點。 最後，本研究依據研究結果，針對資料庫製作者、圖書資訊服務界、研究者，以及未來研究等四方面，提出相關建議。 / The purpose of this study is to explore the characteristics of leadership topics literature from earliest to 2009 based on the theoretical perspectives of the bibliometrics. Five fields are used to compile statistics, including publication year, language, education level, publication type, and target audience. The scattering of leadership topics journal articles is examined by Bradford’s Law and Bradford-Zipf law, and the characteristics of core journals are analyzed. Finally, the study counts the leadership theories or ideas explicitly mentioned in abstracts of articles published by core journals from 1980 to 2009 to find out the focuses of the lately leadership topics, and have a better understanding of the developments and trends in leadership research. A total of 38,230 bibliographic records are retrieved from ERIC database. The study concludes as follows: 1.The overall growth of the leadership topics literature is stable, and the growth curve fits exponential growth. 2.English is the most often used language in leadership topics literature. 3.Elementary Secondary Education is the education level that leadership topics literature most concerns. 4.Reports are the major publication type of leadership topics literature. 5.Practitioners are the primary target audience of leadership topics literature. 6.The scattering of leadership topics journal articles doesn’t fit Bradford’s Law, but it fits the S-shaped curve of Bradford-Zipf law. According to Bradford’s verbal expression, there are 13 core journals in this study. 7.The core journals have the publication country and the discipline subject centralized situation. 8.The focuses of the lately leadership topics are instructional leadership, distributed leadership, teacher leadership, transformational leadership, moral leadership, and transactional leadership. According to the results, some suggestions were given for database provider, libraries or information service institutions, researchers, and further research.

本研究旨在探討1989至2008年間，台灣、香港、大陸地區工程類文獻作者之共同合作情形，透過兩岸三地被SCIE資料庫蒐錄之文獻數量，進一步觀察十四類工程學門中作者人數、作者合作對象、高產量機構及其合作對象、以及作者人數與文獻被引用次數間是否相關。 研究結果得知在十四類工程學科中，兩岸三地皆以免疫生物醫學工程之平均合作作者人數為最高，環境工程亦同樣在三地都有較高平均作者人數的表現，由此可見，免疫生物醫學工程及環境工程都是較多學者共同合作研究產出的學科。兩岸三地之多作者文獻比率皆在90%左右，單一作者文獻數較少。在高產機構方面，台灣則集中於台灣大學、成功大學、清華大學、交通大學，並發現台灣大學的研究者最常與同校研究者共同合作。此外，兩岸三地之跨國合作對象皆以美國為最多。最後探討作者人數與文獻被引用次數間是否相關，發現兩岸三地單一作者產出之文獻的被引用次數普遍較低，但皆無法明顯看出作者人數與文獻被引用次數間的關係。 本研究結果在為兩岸三地工程學門文獻之作者生產力提供一個概括呈現，以了解不同的工程學門間之差異，並協助高等教育評鑑對於工程領域的學術生產力概況有一背景瞭解，作為日後之評鑑參考。 / The purpose of this research is to discuss the degree of collaboration among engineering literature authors within Taiwan, Hong Kong, and Mainland China from 1989 to 2008. We use the quantity of literatures that are collected from Taiwan, Hong Kong, and Mainland China by the SCIE database to further observe the number of authors in fourteen engineering subjects, the people with whom the authors collaborate, the high production organizations and the people with whom they collaborate, and the correlation between the number of authors and the frequency of being cited. The findings are as follows. Biomedical engineering has the highest average number of author collaboration in Taiwan, Hong Kong, and Mainland China. Environmental engineering also has high average number of author collaboration in relation to other subjects in Taiwan, Hong Kong, and Mainland China. Therefore, we can see that immunity biomedical engineering and environmental engineering are the subjects that require more scholars to collaborate. The percentage of multi-author literature is approximately 90% in Taiwan, Hong Kong, and Mainland China. There are fewer sole-author literature. For high-production organization, the majority of author collaboration has higher concentration in National Taiwan University, National Cheng Kung University, National Tsing Hua University, and National Chaio Tung University in Taiwan. In addition, the researchers from National Taiwan University collaborate mostly with the researchers from the same university. In addition, Taiwan, Hong Kong, and Mainland China has the most international collaboration with the United States of America. Finally, we discuss the correlation between the number of authors and the frequency of being cited. The finding is that the sole-author literature in Taiwan, Hong Kong, and Mainland China has lower frequency of being cited in general, but we cannot find the correlation between the number of authors and the frequency of being cited. The findings of this research is to provide a general representation of literature author productivity in engineering subjects in Taiwan, Hong Kong, and Mainland China, to understand the differences in different engineering subjects ,and to assist higher education institute with background understanding in evaluating the academic productivity of engineering areas in the future.

台灣少年小說的起步相較歐美各國遲緩，晚至1960年代才出現首批本土少年小說單行本，1990年代質量均佳的作品相繼出版，少年小說才深獲肯定。本研究旨在探討1960到2010年台灣地區少年小說出版發展的歷程，以及影響台灣少年小說出版發展的重要事件與因素，並且進一步探析少年小說書目歷年成長的變化情形。 本研究以歷史研究法為主，根據文獻史料分析，台灣地區少年小說出版發展可區分為四個階段：1960－1973年孕育萌芽期；1974－1987年成長茁壯期；1988－1996年交流拓展期；1997年迄今蓬勃發展期。台灣少年小說的出版發展與政治開放、經濟繁榮、社會多元化以及文化與教育水準的提升等社會變遷有密切的關係。最後挑選出台灣少年小說出版歷程中具有指標性意義的16件大事。 本研究兼採書目計量法，對台灣地區出版的少年小說創作出版品之出版年代、出版社、作者等書目資料進行統計分析，以供未來相關研究參考之用。研究結果歸納：(1)台灣少年小說出版量在1990年代急速成長；(2)1990年代以來大陸少年小說作品數呈現穩定的成長；(3)前十名重要的少年小說出版社：依序為九歌、文房、民生報社、幼獅、小魯、福地、小兵、台灣省政府教育廳、富春以及聯經出版社；(4)前五名重要的大陸少年小說出版社：依序為民生報社、九歌、聯經、風雲時代、小魯以及麥田出版社；(5)前十三名重要的少年小說作者：依序為李潼、沈石溪、管家琪、郭妮、李光福、溫小平、張之路、曹文軒、李淑真、黃海、鄭宗弦、周姚萍以及張友漁；(6)前六名重要的大陸少年小說作者：依序為沈石溪、郭妮、張之路、曹文軒、周銳以及秦文君；(7)少年小說作者生產力與80/20 定律驗證並不相符；(8)台灣少年小說出版發展歷程與出版年代的書目成長變化二者可相互呼應。 綜合研究結果，歸納建議：(1)對兒童書目資料庫的建議：早日成立一座國家兒童圖書館，專門負責建置兒童讀物書目資料庫；(2)對兒童圖書編目的建議：應將少年小說與故事書分開獨立編目，便於兒和童少年選讀適合自己的作品；(3)對出版社的建議：應採計畫出版；鼓勵作家展現本土風情的創作，培植寫作新秀；創作和翻譯作品並重，既可觀摩優秀作品又可滿足讀者需求；(4)對作者的建議：多閱讀優良中外少年小說作品，拓展國際視野；從歷史鄉土中尋找題材，持續不斷磨練寫作技巧，提升作品的品質；(5)對圖書館的建議：圖書館應竭盡所能搜羅優良的本土少年小說作品，並且定期舉辦閱讀推廣活動；(6)對相關研究者的建議：研究結果可供兒童文學界、出版社或圖書資訊服務單位作為參考。 / The start of Taiwan juvenile novels was comparably slower than European and American countries. It was as late as the 1960s when the first batch of local single-volume juvenile novels came out. Juvenile novels started to gain recognition until the 1990s when novels of high quality and high volume have been published. The study aims to discuss the process of publishing development for Taiwan juvenile novels between 1960 and 2010, and the important events and influence factors of the publishing development in Taiwan juvenile novels. The study further analyzed the changes in the growth of bibliography for juvenile novels over the years. The study is based on historical research. According to literature review and historical data, the development of Taiwan juvenile novel publication is divided into four periods: Nurturing Period from 1960-1973. Growing Period from 1974-1987. Exchange and Expansion Period from 1988-1996. Booming Period from 1997-current. The publishing development of Taiwan juvenile novels is closely related to the social changes in political opening, economic prosperity, social diversity, and enhancement in the cultural and educational level of the overall environment. The resercher Picked up 16 major events with indicators of significance in the developing process of publication in Taiwan juvenile novels. The study also employs Bibliometrics to conduct statistical analysis on bibliographical data including the year of publication, publisher and authors of juvenile novels published in Taiwan. The result will be used for reference in related studies in the future and is inferred below: 1.The amount of publication for Taiwan juvenile novels showed rapid growth in the 1990s. 2.The number of Chinese juvenile novels appeared in steady growth since 1990. 3.The top ten important juvenile novel publishers include the followings: namely Chiuko, Winfortune Co., Ltd. , Min Sheng Newspaper, Youth, Tien-Wei Publishing Company, Winfortune Co., Ltd., Xiaobin Publishing Company, The Department of Education, Taiwan Provincial Government, Fu Chun Publishing Company Limited, and Linking Books. 4.The top five important Chinese juvenile novel publishers include the followings: namely Min Sheng Newspaper, Chiuko, Linking Books, Storm and Stress Publishing, Tien-Wei Publishing Company, and Rye Field Publishing Company. 5.Top ten important juvenile novelists include the followings: namely Tong Li, Shixi Sheng, Jiaqi Guang, Ni Guo, Guangfu Li, Xiaoping Wen, Zhilu Zhang, Wenxuen Cao, Shuzhen Li, Hai Huang, Zhongxuen Zheng, Yaoping Zhou, and Youyu Zhang. 6.Top ten important Chinese juvenile novelists include the followings: Shixi Sheng, Ni Guo, Zhilu Zhang, Wenxuen Cao, Rui Zhou, and Wenjun Tai. 7.80/20 Rule is inapplicable to the distribution of juvenile novelists’ productivity. 8.The process of publication in Taiwan juvenile novels correspond with the changes in growth for the year of publication in bibliography. The proposed guidelines are summarized as follows. 1.Recommendation for children’s bibliographical database： Establish a national children’s library soon possible which bears the major responsibility of building the bibliographical database for children’s books. 2.Recommendation for children’s library cataloguing： Juvenile novels and story books are recommended for separate and independent cataloguing so that children and youths could select the books suitable for their own reading requirement. 3.Recommendations for publishers: Publication should be planned and authors are encouraged to exhibit the creativity of local style while incubating the new talents in writing. Emphasize both on creativity and translated works that could offer observation of excellent works as well as satisfying reader needs. 4.Recommendations for authors： Read more excellent Chinese or foreign juvenile novels, expand international horizon, search for materials from history of localness, continue to discipline on writing skills, and improve work quality. 5.Recommendation for libraries：Libraries should do the best they could to collect outstanding local juvenile novels and hold reading promotional activities on a regular basis. 6.Recommendations for relevant researchers： The research results could be offered as reference to children’s literary circle, publishing companies or library information service units.

本研究針對台灣各大學人文及社會科學領域發表於Web of Science之SSCI、A&HCI引文索引資料庫所收錄之文獻，以書目計量學探討台灣各大學人文及社會科學領域學術生產力之研究，並針對人文及社會科學領域不同學門其學術生產方式加以分析。 依據科技部之學門分類，將人文學與社會科學領域分為21類，分別統計各領域產出相關之情形，以管理學一產出6,876篇最高，而管理學一領域同時也是產出學校數（122所）最多的領域，且以平均產出56.36篇也是最高，顯示管理學一領域相關科系為目前社會科學領域產出之主要科系。人文學與社會科學各領域文獻單一作者與多作者文獻篇數作統計結果發現，各領域間以多作者共同產出文獻為主，僅少部分領域單一作者比例高於多作者比例，以各領域平均作者人數而言，如以四捨五入後為1位者，僅文學一與哲學兩個領域，在全部21個領域中最為接近單一作者產出。其餘19個領域平均作者人數皆大於1.5人。 本研究結果為台灣各大學人文及社會科學領域學術生產力提供一個概括呈現，並協助高等教育評鑑對於全臺灣各大學社會科學領域，學術生產力概況有一背景瞭解，作為日後之評鑑參考。 / This study aims to investigate the scholarly productivity of the humanities and social sciences in Taiwan’s universities by employing a bibliometric methodology. The research data are retrieved from SCI and A&HCI database via Web of Science. In addition, this study reveals the academic production regime in different disciplines under humanities and social sciences. According to the academic classification by the Ministry of Science and Technology in Taiwan, this study is conducted to divide the humanities and social sciences into 21 disciplines, collect the statistical data, and analyze the output in all the disciplines as well. The findings are as follows. Manegement I, with an output of 6,876 articles, leads in quantity of academic papers. Furthermore, Manegement I is also the most highly productive discipline in the fields of humanities and social sciences by the research papers from 122 colleges. As for numbers of average output papers, the discipline Manegement I, again, indicates that it is currently the main department in social science fields; an average output of 56.36 papers is the highest productivity. Compare the multi-author documents with the sole author articles in humanities and social science fields; it is statistically found that, the majority are multi-author papers among the disciplines. Only a small proportion of single-author articles in some areas, the ratio are higher than that of the multi-author documents. In the analysis of the average numbers of authors after rounding to the nearest integer, Chinese Literature and Philosophy, with the average number of author--1, are the only two disciplines which are close to single-author output in all 21 disciplines. The average numbers of authors in the 19 remaining fields are more than 1.5 persons. The results of the study may draw an outline for the scholarly productivity of the humanities and social sciences in Taiwan’s universities. This thesis, on the other hand, may suggest an overview for the further evaluation of the higher education in Taiwan, by building background knowledge for the disciplines under the humanities and social sciences in the universities.

今已有許多學者研究組織採用資訊科技之議題，而人們看待資訊科技的心態也隨時間變化，影響組織採用IT之因素也許多種，而不同的學者所探討的理論架構和變數也不同，本研究欲做此方向的文獻統整，了解研究趨勢與未來研究方向。 本研究利用彙整分析之研究方法，將過去三十年相關的文獻利用關鍵字搜尋，並利用人工篩選後分析結果，最後我們發現：(1)科技、組織、環境三個因素確實會影響組織採用資訊科技，證實了TOE架構在研究組織採用資訊科技相關之議題的適用性。(2)有些變數像是「顧客滿意」和「採用時機」現在比較少學者探討，但在樣本數足夠的情況下可能是有影響力的變數，未來學者可考慮納入探討。(3)發現「高層支持」、「預期效益」、「競爭壓力」都是確實會影響組織採用資訊科技時會考慮的變數，在實務上，資訊科技的供應商在推廣產品上，應該致力於高層主管的推廣。 / Organizational adoption of information technology is an important research issue for many scholars. However, different scholars may investigate the issue from different technological, organizational and contextual factors (called TOE model), which may lead to inconsistent findings. Therefore, this research aims to build a profile of previously published literature to show historical development. This research adopts bibliometrics as our research method and uses CiteSpace and CATAR toolkit to do our analysis. The results indicate that (1) technology, organization and the environment do affect the organization adoption of Information Technology, confirming the applicability of the TOE model in studying organizational adoption of information technology; (2) some variables like customer satisfaction and timing of adoption are under- explored, more research in the future may better understand their influences; (3) top-management support, expected benefits and competitive pressure are key factors that affect the adoption of IT. In practice, IT vendors may use the result to help promote their products.

翻譯是一個通過語言代碼或文字符號的轉換來傳遞訊息的過程，文學翻譯除了必須遵循「忠實、通順、易懂」的一般翻譯原則，還必須提供文學欣賞的價值，所以可以說文學翻譯是一種藝術，涉及兩個民族的審美觀點和意識。中國近代翻譯文學既是近代中西文化交流的必然結果，同時也是近代中西文化交流的主要載體之一。 本研究採用書目計量學研究方法，旨在探討1950至2008年間，台灣地區世界文學作品翻譯成中文作品的概況，透過全國圖書書目資訊網（NBINet）蒐集的書目資料，進一步觀察不同地區的作品被翻譯成中文的情形，接著再以「書目單位」、「包含重印本」、「不含重印本及新版」三種計算方式，進行洛卡定律、普萊斯平方根定律及80/20定律等三大學術生產力定律，加以驗證翻譯文學作者與翻譯者生產力之可行性，以作為未來相關研究參考之用。 研究結果歸納如下，1.台灣地區世界文學翻譯作品概況為：(1)翻譯文學的作品國別集中在英、美，其次為法、德、俄；(2)翻譯文學作品呈現穩定成長；(3)翻譯文學出版社出版量集中在21所出版社當中；(4)被翻譯最多的文學作品、作者、與最多產的翻譯者皆集中在英國、美國、法國、德國及俄國；(5)翻譯文學各分區分佈情形大不相同。2.歐美文學翻譯作品生產力定律驗證情形為：(1)被翻譯作者生產力及翻譯者生產力與洛卡定律均不相符；(2)書目單位計算的低生產力作者比例與洛卡定律最為相近；(3)不含重印本計算的低生產力翻譯者與洛卡定律最為相近；(4)翻譯文學作者與翻譯者的生產力與普萊斯平方根定律驗證及80/20定律驗證均不相符。 / Translation is a process to communication by languages or signs. Literature translation should follow the original principles which are real, clear, and understanding, and it should also afford the value of literature art. Therefore, we can say literature translation is an art, which shows the appreciation of the beauty and sense for two different nationalities. The modern literature translation is not only the result of cultural exchange but also the way for cultural exchange. The main purpose of this study is to explore the world translated literature in Taiwan from 1950 to 2008 based on the theoretical perspectives of the bibliometrics. Three ways are used to compile statistics, including “bibliographic units”, “copies”, and “works” . The distributions of institution productivity are examined by using the Lotka’s, Price and 80/20 Laws. A total of 32159 bibliographic records is retrieved from the NBINet (National Bibliographic Information Network) databases. The results of this study about world translated literature in Taiwan are as follows: (1) The original translated literatures are mostly concentrated in England, USA, France, German, and Russia. (2) The overall growth of the world translated literature in Taiwan is in a vigorously up-growing trend. (3) The publishing of the world translated literature in Taiwan is concentrated in 21 publishers. (4) Most translated literatures, authors, and translators are mainly concentrated in England, USA, France, German, and Russia. (5) The distribution in every country is not the same. Furthermore, the examinations of world translated literature in Taiwan are: (1) The examination of Lotka’s Law is found inapplicable. (2) The percentage of low production authors counted by bibliographic units is similar to Lotka’s Law. (3) The percentage of low production translators counted by works is similar to Lotka’s Law. (4) Price’s Square Root Law and 80/20 Law are found inapplicable to the distribution of authors’ and translators’ productivity.

本研究是王亦勤《台灣地區學術生產力研究-以12所頂尖大學為例》之後續研究，同樣以台灣教育部第一次補助五年五百億款項的頂尖大學計畫中，獲選之12所大學為研究對象，根據WOS系統收錄之期刊文獻，收集了大約13萬筆資料進行被引用次數分析研究。主要研究目的是期望透過各校被引用次數之分佈情形，對各校學術學術文獻影響力進行瞭解。研究方法是利用WOS系統收集各校學術文獻的資料，接著進行書目計量統計，分析各校及各系所的被引用次數，透過各系所文獻被引用的情形探討此12所大學在各領域的學術影響力。 本研究結果發現，各校被引用次數於各類組之分佈情形綜合來看以台大的表現最佳；各校被引用次數之歷年分佈並不一致，但由整體被引用次數分佈情況可發現，學術文獻要達到被引用的最高峰可能在5~10年左右，超過這段期間或時間距離太近的文獻被引用的情況較低；本研究利用普萊斯平方根定律及80/20法則，進行被引用次數與研究單位數之集中特性分析，所獲得之研究結果符合80/20法則的規律，接近普萊斯平方根定律的分佈特性；透過各校之H指數與各類組被引用次數之學校排名後發現，難以根據各校之H指數瞭解各校於不同領域之學術影響力，要對各校系所及各領域之H指數進行探討才能進行較客觀的比較研究，但由於WOS系統對於各研究單位名稱之著錄並不一致，難以獲得較精確之數據，因此本研究不以此方法對各校學術影響力進行綜合評比，僅就各校H指數與各校之被引用次數進行比較分析；本研究以被引用次數及文獻篇數進行相關性研究，發現文獻被引用次數與文獻篇數之間具有高度正相關的特性，因此推論各研究單位文獻發表篇數多能獲得較多被引用次數，但並不表示發表文獻愈多的單位被引用次數一定高於發表篇數較少的研究單位。 / This study is a continuing study fellow Wang Yi-Chin’s “A study of scholarly productivity in Taiwan: Bade on the Case of 12 Universities”. The studying units selected by this study are the same as Wang’s. Base on WOS database, this study collected one hundred thirty thousand data for research. The main purpose to research journal article’s cited times is for understanding the influence of Taiwan top 12 universities in scholar. This study discoveries several results as: National Taiwan University has the best cited references times; the cited references of 12 universities distribute differently in every year, but articles cited by five to ten years ago reached the top peak of overall cited times; this use “Price square root law” and “80/20 principle” to examine the cited times and the research units which has cited times. And the outcome of this study is approaching “Price square root law” but match with “80/20 principle”; by H-Index, this study prefers to infer it can’t be considered as a exact indicator for measuring the performance of research influence created by universities in different fields; account to this study, there is quite highly interrelationship between cited times of articles and the number of articles.

偉大的科學家牛頓曾說：「如果我能比別人看的更遠，那是因為我站在巨人的肩膀上」。任何一個學科的發展，其創始和演進的過程中，必定有一群具有前瞻性與領導風格的研究者，憑藉著他們本身的才能與智慧、努力的奉獻和卓越的理念做出具體的貢獻，透過相同的理念奠定學科的根基，並促使學科興盛發展。 本研究採用書目計量學研究方法中的共被引分析法，以美國資訊科學學會所頒發「最佳貢獻獎」之得主為研究對象，並以1900年至2007年為研究範圍，進行資訊科學家之間的主題性分析。本研究旨在探討44位資訊科學先驅的共被引情況，以瞭解各位先驅和各領域主題的群集現象，進而探討資訊科學的知識結構。本研究透過Web Of Science資料庫分別對於44位資訊科學家與個人被引用最多之著作進行共被引次數檢索，製成共被引矩陣，除了瞭解資訊科學家與其被引用最多之著作的共被引強度外，並以KNOT軟體進行路徑搜尋網路分析，進一步探討資訊科學之主題分佈情況，並與前人所做的相關研究進行比較。 本研究結果歸納如下： 一、資訊科學先驅的被引用次數和共被引次數 (一)被引用次數和共被引次數高低的差異，較高者可強化連結強度，較低者可反應出不同的學科結構。 (二)共被引次數較普遍者，具有跨領域的特性。 二、資訊科學先驅的路徑搜尋網路分析 (一)資訊科學領域以五大領域為主要範疇。分別是以Salton, G所領軍的資訊檢索領域；Lancaster, FW所代表的圖書資訊學與圖書館教育、圖書館自動化與自動化系統、圖書館與資訊服務評鑑等領域；Garfield, E為核心的資訊計量學與引用文獻分析之領域；Belkin, NJ所代表的使用者研究與資訊尋求行為領域；Saracevic, T為主的圖書資訊科學概念與理論、圖書資訊科學史的領域。 (二)單篇被引用最多之著作的網路圖無法判別。 三、本研究與White, HD (2003a)研究結果之比較結果 (一)資訊科學領域的學科結構並無太大變動。 (二)資訊科學中心點的不同。本研究所得的網路圖是以Salton, G為圖形的中心點，而White, HD (2003a)則是以Lancaster, FW為圖形中心點。 四、資訊科學領域有跨學科之性質。透過分析結果可以發現資訊科學有跨領域的特性，在許多的資訊科學先驅本身的研究範疇不只侷限於資訊科學，甚且有跨越其他學科主題，例如：電腦科學、社會網絡分析、數學、統計學等。 / Newton, one of the great scientists, said：「If I have seen further it is by standing on the shoulders of giants.」The development in any discipline, in the founding and evolution of the process , there must be a group of forward-looking with the leadership style of the researchers. They make concrete contribution by virtue of their own abilities and intelligence, outstanding efforts and dedication. They through the same idea lay the foundation of their subjects and flourish their disciplines. This study aims at using co-citation analysis of bibliometrics, and regards the Winners of Award of Merit of American Society for Information Science as the research objects to analyze the relevance between and between information scientists, and the research years from 1900 to 2007. The main purpose of this study is to explore the co-citation counts of 44 information scientists to understand the pioneers and the major subjects in information science, and further explore the structure of scientific knowledge of information science. This study through the Web Of Science database retrieve the co-citation counts of 44 pioneers of information science and the most cited of their works to build co-citation matrix. The result let us understanding the co-citation strength of 44 pioneers of information science. We also use the KNOT software in the analysis of PFNETs, try to explore the subjects how to distribute in information science, and take the results compare to the results of the study by White, HD in 2003. The results of the study reveal that: 1.Cited counts and co-citation counts of 44 pioneers of information science (1)The difference between higher counts and lower counts. The higher counts can strengthen the connections between the network, the lows counts can response to the different structures of information science. (2)The higher co-citation counts commonly have the characteristics of cross- discipline. 2.The PFNETs of 44 pioneers of information science (1)The fields of information science divide into five main areas. Salton, G lead the field of information retrieval. Lancaster, FW represent the education of library science and information science, library automation and automated systems, the evaluation for library and information services etc.. Garfield, E as the core of the field of informetrics and citation analysis. Belkin, NJ represent the field of the users research and information-seeking behavior. Saracevic, T represent the field of library information science concepts and theories, the history of library and information science etc.. (2)The network map of the most cited works of 44 pioneers of information science cannot be differentiated. 3. Take the results compare to the results of the study by White, HD in 2003 (1)The field of information science disciplines have not much change in the scientific structure. (2)Different focal point in the maps of information science. This study is based on the network map as Salton, G as focal point for the network, and White, HD (2003a) is based on the network map as Lancaster, FW as focal point for the graphics. 4. The field of information science has the nature of interdisciplinary. The results can be found through the co-citation analysis of information scientists on cross-cutting nature of information science. A pioneer in many areas of study itself is not limited to information science, and even likely to go beyond the subject of other disciplines, such as: computer science, social network analysis, mathematics, statistics etc..

本研究利用書目計量學與引用文獻分析法分析引用1998年至2008年資訊科學重要期刊之特性。四種代表性期刊分別為Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology、Information Processing and Management、Journal of Information Science以及Journal of Documentation，研究樣本取自WOS資料庫，共計9579篇書目資料。希冀藉由分析探討引用資訊科學文獻之分佈現象與主題範疇，以觀察其他學科與資訊科學學科的互動關係。 本研究結果歸納如下：(1)資訊科學期刊被引用文獻篇數數量隨年代增長。(2)研究型文章為引用資訊科學期刊文獻最主要的資料類型。(3)本研究不完全符合布萊德福與布萊德福-齊夫定律，但可經由布萊德福-齊夫定律圖解，觀察出核心期刊有七種，核心期刊主題以圖書館學與資訊科學為主。 (4)引用資訊科學期刊文獻之學科大類分佈情況，以引用圖書館學門以及科學類為主，JOD是圖書館學門重要的參考期刊。(5)期刊及圖書主題分佈以被圖書資訊學主題和資訊檢索引用最多。(6)高被引用文獻以JASIST所佔比例最多，顯示JASIST是高生產力與高品質兼具的期刊，是資訊科學最重要且最受關注的文獻來源。(7)高被引主題以全球資訊網最多，其次為線上資訊檢索以及搜尋。(8)高被引作者共21位，目前皆任職於學校機構，以從事資訊科學、資訊研究領域為主，研究主題則是資訊檢索、資訊計量學等為多。這21位核心作者可以說是目前資訊科學界的核心領導作者。 本研究結果可應用於館藏發展與管理之參考，界定重要的期刊與圖書文獻來源，有助於圖書館或相關研究單位規劃、建立完整的資訊科學研究架構，以支援研究。同時，可將本研究之分析應用於資訊科學領域研究者，提供投稿之參考、了解目前研究主流以及未來的發展趨勢等，並可提供於資訊科學期刊編輯者，讓其了解該期刊之表現，適時調整，作為期刊長期追蹤的參考。 / Through bibliometric approach and citation analysis, this study analyzed the related disciplines and subjects of literature citing the important Information Science journals during 1998 to 2008. The four leading Information Science journals are Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Information Processing and Management, Journal of Information Science, and Journal of Documentation. A total of 9579 bibliographic data were from WOS database. Results show that：(1) The cited times of Information Science journals increased steadily. (2) Journal article is the main documentation type citing Information Science journals. (3)The distribution of literature citing Information Science journals does not exactly fit Bradford’s Law and Bradford-Zipf Law. However, by observation on Bradford-Zipf Law graph, there are seven core journals. The chief fields of core journals are Library Science & Information Science, and Information Science. (4) Primary disciplines of literature citing Information Science journals are Library Science & Information Science, and Science. JOD is the important reference journal in Library Science & Information Science discipline. (5) The subjects of journals and books highly citing Information Science journals are Library Science & Information Science, and Information Retrieval. (6) JASIST is highly cited, showing that it is both a high productivity and high quality journal. (7) The highly cited subject is World Wide Web, and followed by information retrieval and search. (8) The highly cited authors, who mainly serve in college and most of whom hold the post in the related Information Retrieval and Information Study departments, defined in this study amount to 21. Most of them specialize in information retrieval and informetrics. Finally, the results of this study can be applied to collection development and management, and identify the core journal and books. It assists libraries or information centers in planning and establishing complete research framework on Information Science.

我國數位典藏計畫自民國87年起至今已發展逾十四年，並於民國91年啟動數位典藏國家型科技計畫。目前已有超過100餘個圖書館、檔案館及博物館等機構參與，且具有多元豐富的主題內容。 本研究旨在探討我國數位典藏計畫自民國91年至99年間之學術論文成果，包含民國97年至99年數位典藏與數位學習國家型科技計畫之成果文獻。本研究採用書目計量學進行文獻特性與跨領域合作分析，經資料蒐集及統計後共計3,032筆書目。首先，針對近九年書目進行文獻特性與主題分析，再者，針對近三年文獻作者計1,186位，進一步進行跨機構與跨領域合作分析。希冀透過本研究，檢視我國數位典藏計畫近九年之學術論文成果分析，並觀察我國數位典藏計畫參與機構/成員間之跨領域合作情形。 本研究結果歸納如下：1.我國數位典藏與數位學習計畫學術研究多元，以研討會論文類型發表居多；2.我國數位典藏與數位學習計畫文獻內容以系統建置與技術服務主題居多，觀察近三年文獻主題則以「數位學習與教育」方面文獻數則較多，可推論因97年起與「數位學習國家型科技計畫」計畫合併，因而在數位學習方面之文獻數量比例增加。3.近三年機構生產力排名為國立臺灣師範大學、中央研究院、國立中央大學、國立臺灣大學、國立臺南大學；4.近三年作者領域以人文及社會科學與工程技術為背景居多；5.近三年作者跨領域合作以工程技術與科學教育合著情形居多。 / The Taiwan Digital Archives Program had been developed 14 years since 1998. Presently, more than 100 libraries, archives and museums and other institutions had involved, and the digital content range covering art, humanities history and life science. This study aimed to explore the Taiwan Digital Archives Program from 2002 to 2007 and its successor of Taiwan Digital Archives and e-Learning Program from 2008 to 2010 as research scope. The research is to find out characteristics of the literature production and to look into the interdisciplinary collaboration between co-authors. The major findings are as follows: a. Taiwan Digital Archives and e-Learning Program has diverse research and development, and types of published papers were mainly conference papers. b. The subject of published papers of Taiwan Digital Archives and e-Learning Program were mainly system building and technical services. However, to observe in recent years the literature subjects are mainly e-learning and education. c. The past three years of productivity rankings in sequence is National Taiwan Normal University, Academia Sinica, National Central University, National Taiwan University and National University of Tainan. d. The past three years of author background is mainly humanities and social sciences and engineering and technical. e. To observe the interdisciplinary collaboration of co-authors is between engineering technology and science education.