每一個平等理論所要處理的都是不公平。德沃金藉其具原創性的拍賣會與保險市場思想範例以構建平等一概念，其中最可貴者在於其理論擺脫以量定義平等的窠臼。而藉保健檢視德沃金理論後，我認為對人的平等考量與敏於志向、鈍於稟賦兩項原則是非常值得任何平等理論奉為圭臬者；但其理論中仍有未能全身而退、通過保健檢視的部分。至於可取德沃金理論而代之的平等理論，我目前推薦沈恩的能力取徑，因為它從一個動態的面向來考量平等，而這可能比德沃金的理論前提更貼近事實。 / Every egalitarian theory copes with unfairness. R. Dworkin uses his very original auction and insurance market to build the concept of equality without using any concept of being equal in quantity. By the inspection through health to Dworkin’s theory of equality, I found that there are two principles worth adopting in a theory of equality, which are the “equal concern among individuals” and “being ambition sensitive and endowment insensitive.” Others did not pass the inspection through health. As to another theory of equality instead of Dworkin’s, I presently recommend Amartya Sen’s capability approach, which concerns equality from a dynamic aspect of freedom, which might be corresponding more to the fact than the premises of Dworkin’s.

京都大学 / 新制・論文博士 / 博士(文学) / 乙第13470号 / 論文博第661号 / 新制||文||719(附属図書館) / 京都大学大学院文学研究科思想文化学専攻 / (主査)教授 水谷 雅彦, 教授 大河内 泰樹, 准教授 児玉 聡 / 学位規則第4条第2項該当 / Doctor of Letters / Kyoto University / DGAM