本研究旨在探討正向心理介入方案對大學生正向心理的影響，以及正向心理介入方案、正向因應策略與主觀幸福感的關係。受試者為國立政治大學的大學生，有效樣本為130人。本研究採問卷調查法，施以情緒溫度計量表、主觀幸福感量表、臺灣憂鬱情緒量表、臺灣正向比量表、臺灣巔峰幸福感量表、靈性幸福感量表、正向因應策略量表及心理資本量表，並蒐集前測與後測資料。資料分析方法包含：成對樣本t檢定、獨立樣本t檢定、單因子變異數分析、內容分析法及結構方程式模型。本研究主要發現如下： 一、在前、後測方面 （一）大學生在「主觀幸福感」、「主觀幸福感」分量表之「社會幸福感」及「情緒幸福感」、「情緒刻度」、「快樂時間」、「持平時間」、「正向因應策略」、「巔峰幸福感」、「巔峰幸福感」分量表之「正向機能」及「正向情緒」、「靈性幸福感」、「靈性幸福感」分量表之「團體靈性幸福感」、「環境靈性幸福感」及「超然靈性幸福感」、「正向比」、「心理資本」、「心理資本」分量表之「復原力」、「希望」及「樂觀」上有顯著差異。 二、在背景變項方面 （一）不同性別大學生在「正向心理介入方案」上有顯著差異。 （二）不同性別大學生在「負向情緒」上有顯著差異。 （三）不同年級大學生在各背景變項上皆無顯著差異。 三、在結構模式方面 （一）正向心理介入方案對正向因應策略有直接正向效果。 （二）正向心理介入方案對主觀幸福感有直接正向效果。 （三）正向因應策略對主觀幸福感有直接正向效果。 　　最後，研究者根據研究結果與討論，針對高等教育及未來研究提出若干建議。 / The main purpose of this study was to explore the positive psychology intervention effects on college students, and also the relationships among positive psychology interventions, positive coping strategies and subjective well-being. The participants included 130 college students sampled from National Chengchi University. The pretest and posttest data were both collected by questionnaires, including the Emotional Thermometer Scale, the Subjective Well-Being Scale, the Taiwan Depression Scale, the Taiwan Positivity Scale, the Taiwan Flourishing Scale, the Spirituality Well-Being Scale, the Positive Coping Scale, and the Psychological Capital Scale. Moreover, the data analysis was based on paired-samples t-test, independent-sample t-test, one-way ANOVA, content analysis method, and SEM. The main results were summarized as follows: About the pretest and posttest: 1.Students were significantly different in the scores of subjective well-being, social well-being, emotional well-being, emotional degree, happy time, balanced time, positive coping strategy, flourishing well-being, positive function, positive emotion, spirituality well-being, group-spirituality well-being, environment-spirituality well-being, super spirituality well-being, positivity, psychological capital, resilience, hope, and optimism. About the background variables: 1. Students with different gender were significantly different in the scores of positive psychology interventions. 2. Students with different gender were significantly different in the scores of negative emotion. 3. Students with different grade were not significantly different in the scores of background variables. About the structural model: 1. Positive psychology interventions had positive influence on positive coping strategy directly. 2. Positive psychology interventions had positive influence on subjective well-being. 3. Positive coping had positive influence on subjective well-being. Based on the results and discussion of this study, directions of higher education and future research were suggested.

回顧地震災難心理學的相關研究指出，災難創傷所引起的心理壓力反應具有長期、慢性化的影響，然而許多有心理壓力反應症狀的民眾可能會因為精神疾病的污名化、社會文化的漠視或忽視、應付接踵而至的生活事件、或症狀引起的退縮行為等種種因素，而不願或未求助心理專業的協助，因此相關的研究同時也指出發展外展心理介入計劃的必要性；然而不論在實務或在研究方面，對有心理症狀但未求助的災民實施外展心理介入卻是鮮而少見的。 / 本篇研究採用已獲多數研究證實有效治療創傷壓力疾患（Posttraumatic Stress Disorder, PTSD）的認知行為治療（Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy, CBT），做為對有症狀但未求助的九二一災民外展心理介入的工作架構，再透過發現取向（discovery-oriented）的研究方法，整理分析介入訪談的資料，以獲得外展心理介入歷程的發現與探討。 / 整理、分析研究資料發現：災民容易因為災後接踵而至的生活變動或退縮而無法求助心理專業，災民因為地震後引發早期適應不良基模和外在聚焦的因應型態，以致無法覺察沒有求助或造成心理症狀慢性化，此與吳英璋（2000）所論及性格特質與災後處遇因素影響災後心理反應是一致的。外展心理介入以持續、密集的方式與災民建立適當的工作關係，改變災民對人負向的基本信念，讓災民有更深入的敘述與自我覺察，其次在貼近災民的日常生活脈絡中，從日常生活事件反覆地分析與練習，才足以動搖既有的信念與行為反應，使災民對事件產生內在聚焦的因應來增加自我效能和控制感，並且從災民置身所在的環境脈絡裡處理創傷個案的經驗迴避問題。以CBT做為外展心理介入的架構進行介入，比較無法使用家庭作業讓個案學習與練習，需透過個案所及能說的日常生活事件中，對其內在經驗聚焦、反覆辯證以致增加個案正向經驗、辨識刺激控制、以及思考的辨證，使個案增加自我效能、控制感、自我肯定等，以達到增加個人資源與賦權之目的。 / There are lots of studies about disaster psychology related earthquakes presenting long-term chronically influence to psychological reactions, and implicating the importance of outreach intervention programs for non-seeking people with traumatic psychological reactions or posttraumatic stress disorder(PTSD). The people might not get help from professionals because stigmatization, apathy or ignore of society, business on going daily events, or withdrawal symptoms. So far as, neither even practicing nor research, there is few article about outreach intervention program for the people with psychological symptoms but non-seeking help. This study applies the framework of cognitive-behavioral therapy(CBT) verified by a lot of studies and practice for PTSD, and uses the discovery-oriented research, to discover and gain the understandings of outreach psychological intervention to non-seeking help people with psychological stress reactions in 921 earthquake. The result finds that people with psychological stress reactions mostly accompany with continuously daily event and withdrawal symptoms to seek help. The early maladaptive schemas invoked by earthquake and the external focus make people difficult to aware the need for help and chronically, and this finding is consistent with the discussion of the psychological reactions influenced by personality trait and disaster management in Wu (2000). Outreach psychological intervention established the working relationship through continuously, condensed schedule changing their negative belief to people, and having them deeper narrative and self-awareness. Secondary, by closed their contextual daily life and repeated exercises by daily event, such impacts are enough to shake their steadily believes and habituated behavioral reactions, then to have people internal focus and increase self-efficacy and controllability; further management is contextual analysis and treatment of experiential avoidance in the ecological context of daily life. The outreach psychological intervention by the framework of cognitive-behavioral therapy, it is difficult to apply homework assignment as review or exercise between sessions; and for regaining personal resource and empowerment, outreach psychological intervention mostly applies internal focus and repeated dialectical discussion to increase positive experience, discriminate of stimulus control, and dialectical thinking, and finally people have more self-efficacy, controllability, and self-assertiveness.