本論文為一冊，約八萬五千餘言，分為五章，二十二節，其內容如下： （一）緒論：旨在說明本文中所牽涉的幾個重要名詞：官僚制度與政策形成過程，並 就官僚的權力性質及權力性質及其在政策形成過程中扮演之角色予以敘述。 （二）爭取政治支持的生態環境：美國行政官僚扮演極濃的政府角色，是有它的特殊 環境，其中犖犖大者為三權分立與制衡、政黨領導的式微、利益團體的活躍、人民參 與的意願與官僚的民主色彩。 （三）爭取支持的主要對象：官僚爭取政治支持的主要對象，一外是社會大眾、大眾 傳播、利益團體、總統和國會部門，最後值得吾人探討的是三角聯盟的建立。 （四）爭取支持的戢略運用：吾人建構「誘導－施壓型模」作為分析工具，分別討論 行機關如何動員上述對象的支持。 （五）爭取政治支持代價：將學者對於行政機關逐漸為外來支持對象所牽制的說法， 予以分析，並探討行政機關如何迴避對外來支持之對象作過多的讓步，進而探討行政 機關的政決定規則，並提出批判，最後擬就公共利益與組織利益作一分析比較。

全台第一座都會型纜車「貓空纜車」於2007年7月4日正式營運，並在一年三個月創下617萬搭乘人次，成果輝煌；然而在2008年9月，因遭逢辛樂克與薔蜜颱風接連肆虐下，發生纜車T16塔柱邊坡崩塌事件進而停駛。當各界重新檢討這座興建順利的纜車背後隱藏了多少問題之際，本研究運用政策網絡分析，檢視貓空纜車政策形成過程，分別就參與者性質、行動者策略、權力關係與網絡整合性四大面向，就問題形成、政策規劃、政策合法化三個階段，逐段建構政策網絡、確立利害關係人，並探討興建過程中產生的問題。 研究發現，貓空纜車成案的關鍵並非專業評估使然，乃是為了實現馬英九市府的競選承諾。貓空纜車因為規劃過程中受到動物園的影響，導致纜車路線變更，鄰近棲霞山莊，並衍生後續噪音污染等爭議。貓空纜車在木柵觀光茶園社區發展協會及指南宮等民間團體的支持下，削弱了反對聲音；而主要的政策反對者棲霞山莊，則在當時問題意識不明確、預算順利通過等因素下，錯失反對時機。 / The first urban-type cable car in Taiwan “Maokong Gondola” had been inaugurated since 4th of July in 2007. It has successfully achieved 6.17 million hits in one year and three months. However, during September 2008, typhoon Sinlaku and Jangmi struck one after another and incurred serious mudslide erosion underneath pillar T16. The disaster had crippled the whole cable car system and had urged the public to re-examine the whole construction. This study utilizes policy network analysis to evaluate policy formation process regarding the construction of Maokong gondola in terms of four major factors: character of participants, actions’ strategies, power relationship and network integration. Demarcating the policy network while identifying the policy stakeholders and exploring issues arising from the construction process has been carried out in all three stages of the event: problem formation, policy formulation and policy legitimation. This study shows that the key to the approval of Maokong gondola program was not due to professional evaluation, but instead, it was for the political motivation of Ma’s administration to attain victory in campaign. Being affected by the location of Taipei city zoo in the stage of program formulating, the cable car system has been rerouted closer to Chi-shia village, causing noise pollution and other harassment. By strong support from Muzha tea park community development association and Zhinan temple, the opponent’s opinions were gradually suppressed. Due to uncertainty of problem-knowing and easy approval of budget, the main opponent Chi-shia village had finally missed the opportunity in stopping the program.