本研究旨在參照美國跨州學校領導標準證照聯合會（ISLLC）所提出的「ISLLC學校領導者標準」為例，藉以建構出國民中小學校長領導能力指標權重體系。研究方法運用分析網路程序法（ANP），研究工具則採用編修之「國民中小學校長領導能力指標權重體系調查問卷」，並以校長學、校長培育、學校行政等領域之13位學者專家為研究對象，對國民中小學校長領導能力指標之內容進行重要性評比。 本研究依據研究結果，得到以下二項研究結論： 一、學校文化與教學方案為最重要之校長領導能力向度 二、提升教師專業能力為最重要之校長領導能力指標 而依據研究結論，本研究提出以下建議，以作為教育行政機關、校長培育機構等之參考。 一、對教育行政機關之建議 （一）儘速研擬設立校長培育標準及專責單位 （二）校長領導能力指標可作為校長評鑑與校長證照制度之基礎 二、對校長培育機構之建議 （一）校長培育課程中其校長領導能力的規劃，以「學校文化的建立」與「教師能力的提升」作為初階能力的養成 （二）「提升教師專業能力」、「合作發展與共享」、「發展績效評估系統」作為校長培育課程的首要目標 此外，本研究亦針對後續研究者在研究對象、研究方法及研究範圍等三方面，提出相關建議。 關鍵字：校長領導能力、校長培育課程、分析網路程序法 / The purpose of this study is to construct a weight system of principal’s leadership competence indicators for the elementary and junior high school, and this study refer to “Interstate school leaders licensure consortium: Standards for school leaders” as an example. The main method of this study is Analytic Network Process (ANP). The research instrument of this study is a modified questionnaire which is used to survey the elementary and junior high principal’s leadership competence. 13 scholar experts most in principalship, principal preparation and school administration are taken as the research object to estimate the importance of indicator for the elementary and junior high school principal’s leadership competence. According to the research results, two conclusions are as follows: 1. School culture and instructional program is the most important dimension of school principals' leadership competence. 2. Enhancement of the professional competence of teachers is the most important indicator of school principals' leadership competence. This study provides the following suggestions from the conclusions to the educational administrations and the organizations of principal preparation for reference: 1. For education administration authority (1) Plan to establish the standards of principal preparation and set up an unit in charge of them. (2) The indicator of school principals' leadership competence can be a basis of principal evaluation and principals’ licensure. 2. For the institutes of principal preparation (1) Planning of principals' leadership capacity in the principal preparation courses as entry-level capacities are “The establishment of school culture” and “The enhancement of the professional competence of teachers”. (2) The principal of the primary objective of the course are “The enhancement of the professional competence of teachers”, “The cooperation and development and sharing”, and “The development of performance evaluation system”. In addition, this study also provides future researchers in three areas of the object of study, research methods and scope of the study to make recommendations. Keywords: principal leadership capacity, principal preparation program, analytic network process

本研究旨為國民小學校長培育課程與校長績效管理能力之研究。研究方法為文獻分析、焦點團體座談、問卷調查、與專家訪談。焦點團體座談對象為教育行政機關主管與學者專家10位，國民小學校長10位；問卷調查之樣本為臺灣地區各縣市公立國民小學校長共600人，可用問卷462份，可用率為77%；專家訪談對象為校長培育機構領導者計5位。研究工具包含自編之「國民小學校長培育課程與校長績效管理能力之研究調查問卷」、「國民小學校長培育課程與校長績效管理能力之研究座談大綱」、「國民小學校長培育課程與校長績效管理能力之研究專家訪談大綱」。本研究統計方法為描述性統計、t考驗、單因子變異數分析與Scheffé事後比較、皮爾森積差相關、線性結構關係分析（SEM），內容分析等方法。根據研究結果與分析後歸納之研究結論如下： 壹、國民小學校長培育課程之內涵包含校長教育理念、校長專業知能、校長實務實習。 貳、國民小學校長績效管理能力之內涵包括目標執行能力、授權增能能力、敏銳覺察能力、開放對話能力、評量考核能力、省思回饋能力。 參、校長培育課程對校長績效管理能力之發展有重要影響。 肆、國民小學校長知覺校長培育課程之幫助程度，得分程度佳；並於「校長專業知能」向度得分最高；「校長教育理念」向度得分最低。 伍、國民小學校長知覺校長績效管理能力之符合程度，現況得分程度佳；並以「開放對話能力」向度得分最高；「評量考核能力」得分程度最低。 陸、背景變項之探討，國民小學校長之性別、年齡、最高學歷、校長年資及學校區域，於知覺校長培育課程之幫助程度有顯著差異。 柒、背景變項之探討，國民小學校長之年齡、校長年資及學校規模，於校長績效管理能力之符合程度有顯著差異。 捌、知覺校長培育課程之幫助程度對校長績效管理能力之符合程度上有顯著差異。 玖、國民小學校長培育課程與校長績效管理能力具相關性。 壹拾、驗證校長培育課程對校長績效管理能力關係佳。 最後，本研究依研究結果分別提出以下建議： 壹、對教育行政機關之建議 一、參酌校長培育之不同模式進行整合，以規劃統一適用之校長培育制度。 二、建構國民小學校長證照之檢定制度，以提升學校校長之專業素質。 三、建置國民小學校長專業資格檢定制度，以發展校長準則之專業指標。 四、針對現行國民小學校長遴選制度，積極思考未來可行之解決方案。 五、檢討國民小學學校績效管理制度，避免品質考核之績效制度流於形式。 貳、對校長培育機構之建議 一、探討不同校長培育機構之學習經驗，作為規劃未來課程模式之參考。 二、針對國民小學校長準則之專業指標，建構未來培育課程之模式。 三、強化國民小學校長培育之績效管理課程，進行個案研究等案例研討。 四、運用個案研究、問題導向與同儕學習之教學法，促進校長實踐智慧。 參、對校長之建議 一、瞭解不同校長培育機構之課程規劃，持續校長自我專業發展。 二、理解校長實踐學校績效管理之流程與作為，力求自我知行一致。 三、建置校長專業發展之知識分享平台，提升校長績效管理能力。 四、培養校長面對變革之自我因應能力，掌握學校多元之情境脈絡。 肆、對後續相關研究之建議 一、進行校長培育課程與校長績效管理之質性研究。 二、加入他評之研究調查方法進行多元觀點之參照與研析。 三、考量組織文化或型態等背景因素對學校實施績效管理之影響。 四、持續修訂研究量表工具。 / The main purpose of this research is to study the principal preparation curriculum for an elementary school principal and the performance management ability of an elementary school principal. The research methods used was literature analysis, focus group sessions, questionnaires investigation, and interviews. The research instrument was distributed to 600 elementary public school principals all over Taiwan and 462 valid samples were used in this study. The data obtained was interpreted using descriptive statistics, t-test, one-way ANOVA, Scheffé posteriori comparison, Pearson’s product-moment correlation, SEM through the use of LISREL 8.71, and content analysis. The conclusions drawn from the study were as follows: 1.Principal preparation curriculum for principal in Taiwan elementary school includes: education idea, professional competency, practical training. 2.Performance management ability of an elementary school principal includes: goal setting and execution, empowerment, perceptiveness, open dialogue, performance appraisal, reflection and feedback. 3.The principal preparation curriculum had an important influence to principal performance management ability. 4.The principal preparation curriculum “principal professional competency” ranked first and “principal educational idea” ranked last. 5.All principal performance management abilities received a positive outcome and “open dialogue” ranked the first. 6.The elementary school principal’s background demography sex, age, educational background, years in service and school district incurred a significant difference with all principal preparation curriculums. 7.The elementary school principal’s background demography age, years in service and school size incurred a significant difference with all the principal performance management abilities. 8.Principals who got high score on the principal preparation curriculum also got better score in the principal performance management ability than low and middle ones. 9.The principal preparation curriculum was positively correlated with the performance management ability of elementary school principals. 10.The“model fit indices” between principal preparation curriculum and performance management ability of elementary school principals was proper. In the last, based on the research results, the researcher proposed some suggestions for educational administrative agencies, principals, researchers.

本研究係為建構我國高中校長培育之雛型，研究內容涵蓋培育專業課程、師傅校長、現場實習及相關配套措施等。為建立研究架構，先進行文獻分析探討及歸納，並事先訪談學校教師、校長及教育行政主管機關人員以蒐集實務運作意見，經編製成調查問卷，以作為調查工具。以臺北市高中校長、主任、國中校長及教育行政主管機關人員計268人為問卷發放對象，問卷回收222份，回收率達82.84%。問卷回收後，採平均數、標準差、次數分配表及交叉表等方法進行統計分析及討論。謹將本研究獲致之結論臚列如下： 壹、校長培育制度規劃可採本研究建構之四項內涵規劃 貳、高中校長培育專業課程： 一、受試者知覺整體高中校長培育專業課程為需要程度。 二、高中校長培育專業課程以行政管理得分最高。 三、於校長培育專業課程前先行學員評估，據以規劃課程。 參、高中校長現場實習及師傅校長制度 一、於培育課程中期開始，每週安排校長實習課程。 二、校長應每週一天赴學校實習，為期一學期至一學年。 三、依學員意願分配至願意提供實習之學校實習，並經培育單位同意。 四、校長應在二所以上（含二所）不同特色（或程度）學校實習。 五、師傅校長甄選應由校長團體推薦優秀且適合之校長，並經教育主管機關認可。 六、師徒配對方式，以培育單位提供師傅校長名單供學員（實習校長）選擇，並獲師傅校長同意較為合適。 七、師傅校長與學員（實習校長）的配對以一對一形式為佳，於適當時機，增加各師傅校長及各實習校長彼此互動機會，以獲致團隊學習效果。 八、師傅校長參與方式，在培育課程中，每週應安排師傅校長授課時 間。 九、獎勵師傅校長輔導實習校長較佳方式係發給合理酬勞。 肆、校長培育相關配套措施 一、宜由地方教育主管機關所屬教師進修研習中心負責辦理高中校長培育制度。 二、應以資績評分（含學歷、服務年資等）、口試及筆試三項分數選育人員。 三、校長培育專業課程若以儲訓班方式辦理，應儲訓九週至十二週為宜。 四、校長培育專業課程若以修碩士班層級校長學分班辦理，應修畢32學分。 五、校長培育專業課程，應安排於假日及寒暑假期間實施。 六、校長培育時程，應為半年以上未滿一年。 七、校長培育經費應由教育主管機關提供學員部分補助。 八、完成培育課程可於參與校長遴選時加分或將其列為參與校長遴選之必要條件，最能提昇校長參與培育意願。 / The purpose of this study is mainly focused on establishing the preparation prototype of senior high school principals in Taiwan; and the contents of this study contained the professional preparation courses, mentor principals, field internship and related accompanying measures etc. In order to establish the structure of this study, the author first conducted the literature review and generalization, as well as interviewed school teachers and principals and education authority to collect the data of field management as the opinions, in addition, the author then organized and revised the collected data and opinions to make a questionnaire as the research tool of this study. Adopted senior high school principals, directors, junior high school principals and education authority, the total number of them is 268, as the target to distribute this questionnaire; the number of returned questionnaire is 222, and the returned rate is reached 82.8%. Furthermore, mean, standard deviation, frequency distribution and cross table etc. methods were used to statistically analyze and discuss on the returned questionnaire of this study. The obtained outcomes are shown as follows: I. The principal preparation system can be implemented based on the four areas constructed by this research: II. Professional preparation courses of senior high school principals: 1.The degree of needs of professional preparation courses of senior high school principals perceived by the subjects. 2.Administrative management is ranked the highest in the professional preparation courses of senior high school principals. 3.The evaluation of trainees should be conducted before the commencement of the principal preparation courses in accordance with which the course contents should be planed. III. Senior high school principal internship and mentor principal system 1.Internship courses should be arranged every week since the middle of the preparation courses. 2.The principal should spend one day per week as an intern in school for the period between one semester and one school year. 3.The trainee should be assigned as an intern to the school which he/she so chooses which should be approved by the education authority 4.The principal should be an intern in at least two schools (including) which have different features (or levels). 5.The selection of mentor principals should be made from outstanding principals who are recommended by the principals’ association and approved by the education authority. 6.The matching of the mentor and disciple should be made by the trainee (intern principal) who makes selection from the list of mentor principals provided by the preparation institution. 7.The matching of the mentor principal and trainee (intern principal) is preferred in the one-to-one form. If opportunities allow, the interaction between the mentor principal and disciple principal should be increased to achieve the results of group learning. 8.In terms of the mentor principal’s participation, lecture hours should be arranged for the mentor principal. 9.The better incentive to encourage the mentor principal to provide guidance for the disciple principal is the provision of reasonable remuneration. IV. The supporting measures for the principal preparation 1.Teachers’ training institutions under the local education authorities should be responsible for the implementation of the principal preparation system. 2.The trainees should be selected as per their seniority and performance scores (including education, years of service, etc), oral examination and written examination. 3.In the event that the professional preparation courses of principals are undertaken for the purpose of training future principals, the adequate length of preparation should be between 9 weeks and 12 weeks. 4.In the event that the professional preparation courses of principals are undertaken by way of the principal credit program at the level of master’s degree, the total credits required for graduation should be 32 credits. 5.The professional preparation courses of principals should be implemented during holidays and summer, winter vacations. 6.The length of the professional preparation courses of principals should be between half a year and one year. 7.The education authority should subsidize part of the expenses of the professional preparation courses of principals. 8.The completion of the preparation courses may be treated as bonus points in the selection of principals or set as the requirement for the participation in the selection of principals, which will motivate principals to participate in the training program.