段玉裁為清代乾嘉學術的代表學者，對《說文解字》研究有重大貢獻。梁啟超《清代學術概論》認為「玉裁所著書，最著者曰《說文解字注》，《六書音均表》。」學界大都把研究焦點放在《說文解字注》。然而，撰寫此書前，茂堂先撰寫《詩經小學》三十卷等書。《詩經小學》三十卷一書為茂堂較前期著述，實可了解茂堂治學之基礎。然學界對於《詩經小學》三十卷一書之研究，實寥寥可數。因此，為補充學界不足，本文以《詩經小學》三十卷一書作為主要研究對象。本文的主要研究目的有三項一，通過《詩經小學》三十卷比較段玉裁相關著述意見之異同；二，比較《詩經小學》三十卷及出土《詩經》材料；三，判斷茂堂之見是否可從。本文第二章通過《詩經小學》三十卷比較《毛詩故訓傳定本小箋》、《說文解字注》校勘意見，論證茂堂校勘方面的意見並非一成不變。茂堂所論或有可取處，或有斟酌處。第三章比較《詩經小學》三十卷及《詩經小學》四卷本文字意見，發現《詩經小學》三十卷所引石鼓文往往有可商之處。第四章通過《詩經小學》三十卷比較《六書音均表》及《說文解字注》聲韻意見，探討三書聲韻意見之異同，論述各書可取及不足之處。第五章通過《詩經小學》三十卷比較《毛詩故訓傳定本小箋》、《說文解字注》訓詁意見之分歧，探討《詩經小學》三十卷一書於釋詞方面的特色。第六章比較《詩經小學》三十卷及出土《詩經》材料，分辨可取及值得斟酌之意見。最後總結《詩經小學》三十卷在段學及《詩經》學上的意義及該書不足之處。=Being one of the eminent scholars of The Qian Jia School (Qian Jia xuepai 乾嘉學派) in the Qing Dynasty, Duan Yuchai (1735-1815) makes significant contribution to the study of Shuowen jiezi (Explaining single-component graphs and analysing compound characters) and his work was highly praised by his contemporaries. Liang Qichao in his Qingdai Xueshu Gailun (Introduction to the Intellectual Trends in the Qing Period) states that “the two important books written by Yuchai are Shuowen jiezi Zhu (The Annotation on Shuowen jiezi) and Liu-shu Yin-yün Biao (The Study of the Six Categories of the Formation of traditional Chinese characters and Palaeographic Phonology). Modern scholars pay more attention to the study of Shuowen jiezi Zhu. However, Duan Yuchai first basically completed the writing of the thirty volumes of Shijing Xiaoxue prior to the completion of the work Shuowen jiezi Zhu. Duan Yuchai wrote the the thirty volumes of Shijing Xiaoxue during the early stage of his research on classical and etymological studies. By looking into this work, we can have a better understanding of Duan’s fundamental studies on the above-mentioned areas. To date, little research has been done on the thirty volumes of Shijing Xiaoxue. Therefore, this thesis focuses on the study of the thirty volumes of Shijing Xiaoxue. There are three aims of this thesis: First, compare the similarities and the differences in terms of Duan’s palaeological principles through the study of the thirty volumes of Shijing Xiaoxue; second, compare the palaeological findings between the thirty volumes of Shijing Xiaoxue and the excavated texts of Shijing; third, criticizing Duan’s theories to see whether his point of view can be applied in our research. This thesis consists of seven chapters. Chapter One is the Introduction. By studying Mao Shi Gu Xun Chuan Ding Ben Xiao Jian and Shuowen jiezi zhu with reference to the thirty volumes of Shijing Xiaoxue. Chapter Two demonstrates that Duan showed his flexibility in textual problem solving. The study of Duan’s principles on textual criticism is used for our further discussion. Chapter Three shows that the Stone Drum Inscriptions quoted in the thirty volumes of Shijing Xiaoxue require further investigation by comparing the Inscriptions used in the four and the thirty volumes of Shijing Xiaoxue. Chapter Four discusses the similarities and the differences of the three books, namely the thirty volumes of Shijing Xiaoxue, Liu-shu Yin-yün Piao and Shuowen jiezi zhu in terms of Duan’s perspectives on phonology. Chapter Five compares Duan’s views on Chinese semantics in Mao Shi Gu Xun Chuan Ding Ben Xiao Jian and Shuowen jiezi zhu with reference to the thirty volumes of Shijing Xiaoxue, exploring Duan interpreted traditional Chinese lexicons in the thirty volumes of Shijing Xiaoxue. Chapter Six distinguishes whether the theories are applicable or need further consideration by comparing the palaeological data between the thirty volumes of Shijing Xiaoxue and the excavated texts of Shijing. Chapter Seven points out the significance and shortcomings of Duan’s the thirty volumes of Shijing Xiaoxue and its value on the study of Shijing.

吳文忠. / 稿本(電腦打印本) / Thesis (M.A.)--香港中文大學硏究院中國語文學部. / Gao ben (dian nao da yin ben) / Includes bibliographical references (leaves [1-15] (2nd group)). / Wu Wenzhong. / Thesis (M.A.)--Xianggang Zhong wen da xue yan jiu yuan Zhongguo yu wen xue bu. / Chapter 第一章： --- 緒言 --- p.1-23 / Chapter （一） --- 段玉裁生平簡介 --- p.1-3 / Chapter （二） --- 段玉裁研究古音之成就及其理論之特點 --- p.3-16 / Chapter （三） --- 諸家對段玉裁古音學及《說文》學之評價 --- p.16-19 / 註釋 --- p.19-23 / Chapter 第二章： --- 段玉裁《說文解字注》中所見之音韻學理論 --- p.25-89 / Chapter （一） --- 古音十七部之制定 --- p.25-30 / Chapter （二） --- 凡某聲皆有某義 --- p.30-37 / Chapter （三） --- 關於詮釋訓詁(單指音謂方面)之條例 --- p.37-50 / Chapter （四） --- 本音與音轉 --- p.51-55 / Chapter （五） --- 合韻 --- p.55-66 / Chapter （六） --- 正韻、變韻 --- p.66-70 / Chapter （七） --- 聲調之問題 --- p.70-77 / Chapter （八） --- 其他關於音之術語 --- p.77-82 / 註釋 --- p.83-89 / Chapter 第三章： --- 段玉裁以古音理論更訂《說文解字》 --- p.98-155 / Chapter （一） --- 利用古音理論訂正《說文》各家版本 --- p.94-110 / Chapter （二） --- 明字形之混訛及傳寫訛誤 --- p.111-117 / Chapter （三） --- 辨別形近之字 --- p.117-139 / Chapter （四） --- 分辨形聲與會意 --- p.139-150 / Chapter （五） --- 以聲調理論分析古今字 --- p.150-153 / 註釋 --- p.154-155 / Chapter 第四章： --- 以聲韻角度解釋《說文》 --- p.156-195 / Chapter （一） --- 解釋正篆與重文(古文、籀文、俗體)之關係 --- p.161-173 / Chapter （二） --- 解釋讀若音與正箓篆音之關係 --- p.174-193 / 註釋 --- p.195 / Chapter 第五章： --- 《說文解字注》與經傳說解之關係 --- p.196-216 / Chapter （一） --- 段氏引經傳注家解釋字音 --- p.196-202 / Chapter （二） --- 引經傳諸家注音證《說文》字音 --- p.203-206 / Chapter （三） --- 以《說文》解釋經傳之通假 --- p.206-211 / Chapter （四） --- 以音韻理論解釋經傳 --- p.211-214 / 註釋 --- p.216 / Chapter 第六章： --- 對段玉裁古音學理論的評價 --- p.217-386 / Chapter （一） --- 關於古今語音發展的規律 --- p.217-226 / Chapter （二） --- 關於古音十七部的創製 --- p.227-245 / Chapter （三） --- 「凡某聲皆有某義」說之可靠性 --- p.246-301 / Chapter （四） --- 段氏《說文注》所標古韻韻部缺部補正 --- p.302-350 / Chapter （五） --- 對段玉裁「假借」理論看法的評價 --- p.351-357 / Chapter （六） --- 段玉裁就《說文注》中所言之「雙聲」 --- p.358-381 / 註釋 --- p.382-386 / Chapter 第七章： --- 總結 --- p.387-407 / 註釋 --- p.407

司徒嘉明. / 手稿本, 據手稿本影印. / Thesis (M.A.)--香港中文大學硏究院中國語文學部. / Shou gao ben, ju shou gao ben ying yin. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 715-744). / Situ Jiaming. / Thesis (M.A.)--Xianggang Zhong wen da xue yan jiu yuan Zhongguo yu wen xue bu. / Chapter 一 --- 說文段注所稱某行某廢綜論　 --- p.1-75 / Chapter I --- 段說某行某廢之理論 --- p.1-9 / Chapter II --- 段注後諸家輯錄說文廢字槩況 --- p.10-18 / Chapter III --- 段說某行某廢之分類及畧說 --- p.19-65 / Chapter IV --- 總結 --- p.66-68 / Chapter 二 --- 說文段注所稱某行某之分論 --- p.76-403 / Chapter I --- 通叚字行本字廢　　 --- p.76-362 / Chapter II --- 借字行後起正字廢 --- p.363-402 / Chapter III --- 音義相同之行廢　 --- p.404-495 / Chapter IV --- 古籀行小篆廢　 --- p.496-505 / Chapter V --- 或體行本字廢 / Chapter VI --- 俗字行本字廢 / Chapter VII --- 孳乳字行本字廢　 --- p.554-624 / Chapter VIII --- 孳乳字廢本字行 --- p.625-661 / Chapter IX --- 誤字行本字廢　 --- p.662´ؤ668 / Chapter X --- 其他 --- p.669´ؤ690 / Chapter 三 --- 附錄 / 張舜徽說文解字約注論說文之行廢字 --- p.691-714 / Chapter 四 --- 參考書目及論文　 --- p.715-744

研究漢語詞義的學者一向對「詞義引申」十分重視。為求建立理論，學者常取段玉裁《說文解字注》所述的詞義引申作為研究起點。後人亦在段氏的基礎上提出了不少引申規律。為了達到以簡馭繁的效果，本文在前人研究基礎之上，運用核心義理論，考察段注所述引申條目中透露的核心義，目的是深入了解段若膺的詞義觀念，並嘗試更深入探討核心義理論。文章中運用的理論工具，揉雜了傳統訓詁學的觀點，亦引進了西方現代語義學的理論，務求為詞義引申之學開拓新視野和新研究空間。 / 本文以段注的引申條目為研究對象。論文主要分為五個部分： / 第一部分是導論， 簡述前人對段注所述詞義引申的研究成果，分析其不足，指出可以運用最新的核心義理論，以簡馭繁地掌握多義詞。 / 第二部分介紹本研究運用的研究理論與方法， 解釋研究中運用到的詞義概念，分析段注揭示核心義的方式，並說明本研究使用詞義系統分類。 / 第三部分是本研究的主體，從段注中擷取210條條目，逐一把段氏之說跟義位作比對、分析，以確定該詞的核心義，並把核心義貫穿義位的方式以圖表展示。 / 第四部分建基於第三部分的研究成果，嘗試深入討論核心義理論，例如指出核心義的本質、變化，歸納推求核心義的方法，考察核心義制約引申的情況，說明研究意義作用等等。 / 第五部分是總結和展望 ，總結段注對我們研究核心義有怎樣的啟發，亦期望豐富對段注之研究。此外還檢討本研究尚有待討論之處，以待將來深入研究。 / This research paper belongs to the subjects of both Exegesis and Semantics. One prominent research field under these two subjects is the Extension of Meaning. There have been many scholars studying Duan Yucai’s book, Shuo wen jie zi zhu, which has had a great achievement in studying the Extension of Meaning, and expatiated many theories. With a view to having a good grasp of Mr Duan’s concept of meaning of words, Core Meaning Theory, is used to study how Shuo wen jie zi zhu explains the rationale behind the Extension of Meaning. It is hope that this research paper can provide a better understanding of Core Meaning Theory and form a solid background for the research of Extension of Meaning in the future. / This paper focuses on the clauses of extended meanings in the Shuo wen jie zi zhu and it consists of five parts. / Part one is the introduction. Starting with the research history of Shuo wen jie zi zhu, it illustrates that these researches are inadequate to comprehend Mr Duan’s rationale behind the explanation of Extension of Meaning. Using Core Meaning Theory is therefore very significant in simplifying this complicated rational. / Part two introduces the theory and the method used in this paper, as well as some concepts of semantics. How Mr Duan acknowledged the Core Meaning in his book is also analyzed, followed by the system of meaning of words used in the paper. / Part three is the main section. There are 210 annotations in Shuo wen jie zi zhu that have inspired us to acknowledge the Core Meaning. In this part of the paper, these annotations are compared with dictionary entries to analyze the Core Meaning of each word and graphs are drawn to show the relationship between the Core Meaning and the glosseme. / Part four is the interpretation of Core Meaning Theory, which is based on the research of part three. The nature and the variation in Core Meaning are discussed, and the method of locating the Core Meaning is generalized. In addition, it illustrates how the Core Meaning affects the Extension of Meaning, and the usefulness of the Core Meaning is reiterated. / Part five is the summary and the prospect. It is concluded that Shuo wen jie zi zhu is essential in inspiring us to locate the Core Meaning. It is hope that this paper can enrich the achievement of the book and result in more researches into this field in the coming future. / Detailed summary in vernacular field only. / Detailed summary in vernacular field only. / Detailed summary in vernacular field only. / Detailed summary in vernacular field only. / Detailed summary in vernacular field only. / Detailed summary in vernacular field only. / Detailed summary in vernacular field only. / 盧冠忠. / Thesis (M.Phil.) Chinese University of Hong Kong, 2015. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 242-265). / Abstracts in English and Chinese. / Lu Guanzhong.

樊善標. / 稿本(電腦打印本) / Thesis (M.A.)--香港中文大學硏究院中國語文學部. / Gao ben (dian nao da yin ben) / Includes bibliographical references (p. 351-364). / Fan Shanbiao. / Thesis (M.A.)--Xianggang Zhong wen da xue yan jiu yuan Zhongguo yu wen xue bu. / 目綠 --- p.1 / Chapter 第一章 --- 緒論 --- p.1 / Chapter 第一節 --- 王筠《¨®Ơ文》學之淵源 --- p.1 / Chapter 第二節 --- 王筠與《¨®Ơ文》訂段學 --- p.10 / Chapter 第二章 --- 訂段氏校勘本文之誤（上） --- p.26 / Chapter 第一節 --- 引言 --- p.26 / Chapter 第二節 --- 正篆、重文類 --- p.29 / Chapter 第一小節 --- 删篆之誤（附未删正篆重文之誤> --- p.29 / Chapter 1. --- 同部、異部重文 --- p.29 / Chapter 2. --- 累增字 --- p.40 / Chapter 3. --- 《說文》分據《詩》異文收字 --- p.44 / Chapter 4. --- 其他 --- p.51 / Chapter 5. --- 附未删正篆重文之誤 --- p.54 / Chapter 第二小節 --- 補篆之誤（附補重文之誤） --- p.67 / Chapter 1. --- 疏於審證 --- p.67 / Chapter 2. --- 不明說解例 --- p.72 / Chapter 3. --- 附補重文之誤 --- p.77 / Chapter 第三小節 --- 字形之誤 --- p.89 / Chapter 1. --- 未用金石材料 --- p.89 / Chapter 2. --- 不察字形取意 --- p.101 / Chapter 3. --- 不辨材料是非 --- p.111 / Chapter 4. --- 師心改字 --- p.117 / Chapter 第三章 --- 訂段氏校勘本文之誤（下） --- p.127 / Chapter 第一節 --- 說解類 --- p.127 / Chapter 第一小節 --- 誤校之類型 --- p.127 / Chapter 1. --- 誤改說形聲之語 --- p.127 / Chapter 甲 --- 删省聲 --- p.127 / Chapter 乙 --- 改形聲為會意 --- p.137 / Chapter 丙 --- 其他 --- p.141 / Chapter 2. --- 誤改讀若 --- p.143 / Chapter 3. --- 其他 --- p.149 / Chapter 第二小節 --- 誤校之原因 --- p.162 / Chapter 1. --- 不識被¨®Ơ解字義 --- p.162 / Chapter 2. --- 不知「一曰」多出後人 --- p.169 / Chapter 3. --- 不知非字者不出說解之例 --- p.178 / Chapter 4. --- 不明說解用意 --- p.189 / Chapter 5. --- 取證之誤 --- p.198 / Chapter 第四章 --- 訂段氏注釋之誤 --- p.213 / Chapter 第一節 --- 引言 --- p.214 / Chapter 第二節 --- 誤注之類型 --- p.214 / Chapter 第一小節 --- 誤釋字義及說解 --- p.214 / Chapter 第二小節 --- 誤立通例 --- p.235 / Chapter 1. --- 說解必用本字 --- p.235 / Chapter 2. --- 複舉字 --- p.250 / Chapter 第三小節 --- 引證及推理之誤 --- p.273 / Chapter 第四小節 --- 轉注義例及句讀之誤 --- p.299 / Chapter 第三節 --- 補充《¨®Ơ文注》 --- p.321 / Chapter 第五章 --- 結論 --- p.332 / Chapter 附錄一： --- 《¨®Ơ文釋例》删「一曰」統計 --- p.343 / Chapter 附錄二： --- 《說文》「非字之形」出於說解统計 --- p.346 / 參考書目 --- p.351

文映霞. / "2005年7月". / 論文(哲學碩士)--香港中文大學, 2005. / 參考文獻(leaves 210-228). / "2005 nian 7 yue". / Abstracts in Chinese and English. / Wen Yingxia. / Lun wen (zhe xue shuo shi)--Xianggang Zhong wen da xue, 2005. / Can kao wen xian (leaves 210-228). / Chapter 第一章 --- 緒言 --- p.1 / Chapter 第一節 --- 方以智生平及其著述 --- p.1 / Chapter 第二節 --- 《通雅》的撰寫背景 --- p.9 / Chapter 第三節 --- 硏究動機及方法 --- p.26 / Chapter 第二章 --- 《通雅》的體例 --- p.28 / Chapter 第一節 --- 釋「通雅」 --- p.28 / Chapter 第二節 --- 《通雅》卷目 --- p.42 / Chapter 第三章 --- 《通雅》的訓話特色´ؤ´ؤ因聲求義 --- p.48 / Chapter 第一節 --- 形、音、義的關係 --- p.48 / Chapter 第二節 --- 重視音變 --- p.56 / Chapter 第三節 --- 重視方言 --- p.58 / Chapter 第四節 --- 重視《洪武正韻》 --- p.62 / Chapter 第五節 --- 論假借 --- p.65 / Chapter 第六節 --- 小結 --- p.69 / Chapter 第四章 --- 《通雅》對《說文》之疏理 --- p.73 / Chapter 第一節 --- 《通雅》引《說文》之方式 --- p.73 / Chapter 第二節 --- 《通雅》論《說文》 --- p.77 / Chapter 第三節 --- 引《說文》爲證 --- p.94 / Chapter 第四節 --- 解《說文》之說 --- p.96 / Chapter 第五節 --- 糾《說文》之誤 --- p.101 / Chapter 第六節 --- 補《說文》之漏 --- p.115 / Chapter 第五章 --- 《通雅》與《說文解字注》 --- p.123 / Chapter 第一節 --- 校勘《說文》 --- p.124 / Chapter 第二節 --- 因聲求義 --- p.130 / Chapter 第六章 --- 結語 --- p.151 / 附錄凡例 --- p.154 / 附錄一《通雅》卷目 --- p.159 / 附錄二 《通雅》與其他「雅書」卷目比較表 --- p.160 / 附錄三《通雅》各卷引《說文》條目統計 --- p.165 / 附錄四《通雅》與大小徐本《說文》、《六書故》及《古今韻會舉要》對照表 --- p.167 / 附錄五《通雅》引戴侗《六書故》 --- p.193 / 附錄六《通雅》引徐鍇說 --- p.202 / 附錄七《段注》引戴個《六書故》 --- p.205 / 附錄八《段注》引黃公紹《韻會》 --- p.206 / 參考書目 --- p.210

No description available.