本研究之目的旨在探討幼兒就學準備度的相關因素，從幼兒園組織特徵、家庭社經地位、家長參與程度與幼兒園品質等方面來進行幼兒就學準備度之比較。依台北縣都會區與宜蘭縣鄉鎮區小學校數比例隨機抽樣，第一階段先請小一家長填答「幼兒就學準備度相關因素之研究問卷」，取得有效樣本565份後再追溯其過去就讀的幼兒園，請園所長填答「幼兒園品質問卷」，園所有效樣本為89份。資料處理與分析，以SPSS統計軟體進行描述性統計、Pearson相關、獨立樣本t檢定、單因子變異數分析和多元階層迴歸分析。幼兒就學準備度的替代指標包括教師評定的成績等第與家長評定之學習能力、情緒與社會、健康與身體、語文能力、數學能力五領域。研究結論如下：一、公私立幼兒園幼兒就學準備度有顯著差異；二、城鄉的幼兒就學準備度有顯著差異；三、家庭社經地位與幼兒就學準備度有正相關；四、家長參與和幼兒就學準備度有正相關；五、幼兒園品質與幼兒就學準備度有正相關；六、幼兒時期家長參與對幼兒就學準備度具顯著預測力。 　　此外，在其他研究發現方面包括了：一、都會區幼兒就讀私立園所者居多，鄉鎮區則是就讀公立者居多；二、半數以上的幼兒有參與才藝，參與的才藝類型以英文居多；三、公私立幼兒園幼兒的家庭社經地位有顯著差異；四、教師評定幼兒就學準備度現況以「優等」最多；家長評定之現況則接近良好；五、教師評定與家長評定的幼兒就學準備度之間有中度正相關；六、幼兒時期與小學時期家長參與現況均接近良好；七、幼兒時期與小學時期的家長參與程度有高度正相關；八、小學時期的家長參與和幼兒就學準備度有顯著正相關；九、公私立幼兒園的家長參與有顯著差異，從幼兒時期到小學時期皆是就讀私立幼兒園者的家長參與程度較高；十、幼兒園品質現況接近良好；十一、公私立幼兒園品質無顯著差異；都會區的幼兒園品質較佳。 　　本研究最後根據研究結果提出建議，供教育工作者、幼兒父母及未來欲從事相同主題之研究者參考。

本研究目的在於瞭解幼兒就學準備度之內涵，並以實證方式進行幼兒學前教育經驗、幼兒園品質、家庭背景、家長參與的現況瞭解，以及與幼兒就學準備度之間的差異情形、相關情形、預測情形。依隨機抽樣方式，以問卷調查進行兩階段實施，第一階段，抽取632位文山及萬華區小ㄧ學童為研究對象，進行幼兒就學準備度的施測，可用率為75.5%，共477位學童；第二階段根據學童分布的141家公私立幼兒園(幼稚園或托兒所)，進行幼兒園品質調查，可用率為51.8%，共計73家幼兒園。本研究採用量化方法，以SPSS 14.0套裝軟體進行分析，包括獨立樣本t考驗、卡方分配、單因子變異數分析、Scheff’e事後比較、皮爾森基差相關、多元逐步回歸等方式做資料的處理。 研究結果顯示：1、幼兒園屬性及類型對就學準備度有顯著差異，就讀私立幼兒園者其就學準備度高於就讀公立幼兒園者；就讀不同幼兒園類型的孩子其就學準備度有顯著差異。2、幼兒就讀幼兒園年數與學準備度呈現正相關。3、幼兒園品質與就學準備度的無顯著相關。4、家庭背景中的「每月收入」、「父母教育程度」、「父母職業類型」、「父母社經地位」皆與幼兒就學準備度有顯著差異。5、幼兒園與小學時期家長參與呈正相關，兩時期的家長參與與就學準備度也呈現正相關。6、「家庭每月收入」、「幼兒園時期家長參與」、「就讀幼兒園年數」對就學準備度達顯著預測性。 另外其他研究發現部分：1、幼兒園及小學時期家長參與度中偏高。2、幼兒就讀幼兒園類型與家庭環境及區域分佈有關，且家庭背景會影響幼兒園類型選擇。3、幼兒進入小學後就學準備度「學業成績」方面表現不錯，「生活適應」方面表現中等。4、家長參與和家庭背景因素呈現正相關，父母教育程度、職業、社經地位、家庭每月收入月高的家庭，家長的參與程度會越高。5、各類型的幼兒園其幼兒園品質有顯著差異。 本研究並根據研究結果提出建議，以提供家長、學校、政府機關以及未來研究者之參考。 / The main purpose of this study is to understand the concept of school readiness, and examine the experience of early childhood education, the educational quality in ECE (early childhood education), the background of family, parents participate, and the relationships of these items. This study adopts literature analysis and questionnaire investigation to achieve the goal. This study are 2 steps, the first step, 632 first grade elementary school students in Wenshan district and Wanhua district of Taipei City, and 477 samples were received, making the return rate of 75.5%. The second step, basing on 141 early childhood education centers the children attended in last year, and 73 samples were received, making the return rate of 51.8%. The sample results were analyzed by means, standard deviations, t-test, one-way ANOVA, Person’s product-moment correlation and stepwise multiple regression analysis. Depending on the result, the conclusions are as fallows: 1. The children study in private center is better than in public. And the school readiness of children in different types childcare centers has obvious different. 2. The correlation analysis found that there is moderate positive relationship between “How long are children in childcare centers” and “early childhood school readiness”. 3. The correlation analysis found that there is no moderate relationship between “the educational quality in ECE” and “early childhood school readiness”. 4. There were significantly different perceptions towards school readiness to different background family. 5. The correlation analysis found that there is moderate positive relationship between parents participate in early childhood time and elementary school time. “The parents participate in two step” and early childhood school readiness” also show positive relationship. 6. The income of the family per month, the participation of parents in early childhood time and how long children in childcare centers are were appropriate indicators in predicting early childhood school readiness. Otherwise, there are other researches results are discovered as follows: 1. The participation of parents in early childhood time and elementary school time are obviously high. 2. Family backgrounds can affect the choice of the type of the early childhood centers, and the type of the early childhood centers are concerned with family backgrounds and which areas they are in. 3. After children enter the elementary school, their school readiness in” study achievements “are good, and in “live hood adaption” show average. 4. There were moderate positive relationship between “the participation of parents” and “the factors of family backgrounds”, the higher level of education of their parents, their occupations, their position of social and economics and the income per month, the participation of parents show higher. 5. There were significantly different perceptions between types of early childhood centers and their qualities. According to previous conclusions, the researcher proposes some suggestions for parents, school, administration and researchers in the future.