No description available.

No description available.

No description available.

Project (D. Min.)--Southern Methodist University, 1987. / Abstract and vita. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 126-128).

Thesis (M.S.)--University of Wisconsin -- La Crosse, 2009. / Includes bibliographical references.

Not available / text

No description available.

There is no abstract available for this thesis.

Contemporary literature for the double bass includes a large body of new techniques of double bass playing. Though these techniques are not included on any didactic materials for the double bass, they are frequently found in contemporary compositions. The only work which enumerates these new techniques is Bertram Turetsky's book, The Contemporary Contrabass.This dissertation is intended to close the gap between composer and double bass performer by presenting ten etudes which systematically cover the most important of these techniques as outlined in Turetsky's work. The categories in which these new techniques have arisen are those of arco performance, pizzicato performance, harmonics, percussion sounds, and vocal and speech sounds. In addition to these categories, two which pose performance difficulties unique to contemporary music, but not unique to double bass performance, have been considered in this dissertation. These are changing meters and new notation systems. These seven categories of double bass performance techniques, then, form the essential content of the ten etudes, which are composed so that they present these techniques in their typical musical context.The first four etudes are concerned with changing meters, one of the most basic performance problems in contemporary music. The first etude is in quintuple meters only, but the metrical complexity of the first four etudes gradually increases to encompass rapidly changing meters and metric modulations. Etudes V and VI continue to use changing meters, but they are primarily concerned with contemporary pizzicato techniques. Etudes VII through X are concerned with new notational systems, including proportional notation, frame notation, and graphic notation. These latter etudes also present other contemporary techniques in conjunction with the study of notation. Etude VII introduces proportional notation, as well as the various types of harmonics common in contemporary literature. Etude VIII continues the study of proportional notation, but introduces percussion sounds. Etude IX continues the study of percussion sounds, but places them in the context of frame notation, thereby also introducing classical improvisation. Etude X uses percussive and speech sounds in the framework of a simple graphic notational system. Each of these ten etudes is preceded by a text which fully explains the new techniques used.Each etude has been written to approximate the musical styles in which these contemporary techniques are used. These etudes can be performed in concert, as well as in lessons and in practice sessions. It is hoped that these etudes will further enlighten double bass players in the use of new contemporary techniques and contribute to the increased performance of the contemporary works in which they are found.

The purpose of this study was to identify the most responsive measure of aerobic fitness over a four week pre-surgical aerobic training program (prehabilitation) in patients undergoing major bowel resection. Twenty one subjects (14 in exercise, 7 in control) participated. Fourteen subjects underwent 26.5 +/- 8.6 days of progressive aerobic exercise training at 40 to 65% of heart rate reserve (%HRR). The results showed that peak power output was the only maximal measure that responded to training as it improved by 26 +/- 27% (ES = 0.24, SRM = 1.05) in the exercise group (p < 0.05) compared to no change in the control group. For the submaximal measures, 6-Minute Walking Test improved in both group. Submaximal V·O2 (V·O2submax) and Submaximal Heart Rate (HR submax) were the most responsive to training as they decreased by 13 +/- 15% (ES = -0.24, SRM = -0.57) and 7 +/- 6% (ES = -0.40, SRM = -0.97) at 76 +/- 47 W compared to no change in the control group.