• Refine Query
  • Source
  • Publication year
  • to
  • Language
  • 1
  • Tagged with
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • About
  • The Global ETD Search service is a free service for researchers to find electronic theses and dissertations. This service is provided by the Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations.
    Our metadata is collected from universities around the world. If you manage a university/consortium/country archive and want to be added, details can be found on the NDLTD website.
1

Simplified targetry and separation chemistry for 68Ge production

Valdovinos, H. F., Graves, S., Barnhart, T., Nickles, R. J. January 2015 (has links)
Introduction 68Ge (t½ = 270.8 d, 100% EC) is an important radionuclide for two reasons: 1) once in equilib-rium with its daughter nuclide 68Ga (t½ = 68 min, 89 % β+, 3 % 1077 keV γ), it can be used as a positron source for attenuation correction and calibration of PET/MRI scanners; and 2) it can be employed as a generator of 68Ga for radiophar-maceutical preparation. Most isotope production facilities produce it using natural gallium (60.1% 69Ga, 39.9% 71Ga, melting point: 39 °C) as target material for proton bombardment at energies > 11.5 MeV, the threshold energy for 69Ga(p,2n)68Ge [1]. A maximum cross section of ~330 mb for natGa(p,x)68Ge occurs at ~20 MeV [1], hence proton energies in this neighborhood are mandatory for large scale production. Galli-um targetry is challenging due to its low melting point and corrosivity, hence compounds such as Ga2O3 (melting point: 1900 °C) or GaxNiy alloys (melting points > 800 °C) [2], have been used as target compounds [3,4,5]. The separation chem-istry technique employed by large-scale produc-tion facilities is liquid-liquid extraction using CCl4 [6,7]. In this work, two simple methods for GaxNiy alloy preparation are presented as well as a simple germanium separation procedure using a commercially available extraction resin. Material and Methods GaxNiy alloys were prepared by two methods (A,B). A) electrodeposition over 1.3 cm2 of a gold disk substrate. Ga2O3 and NiSO4.6H2O were dis-solved in a mixture of (27%) H2SO4 and NH4OH at pH 1.5 in a 3:2 mass ratio so that the Ga:Ni molar ratio was 4:1. The solution was then transferred to a 15 mL plating cell, in which a current of 29 mA/cm2 was applied with a platinum anode at 1 cm from the gold surface. B) Ga pellets were fused together with Ni powder at different Ga:Ni molar ratios using an induction furnace (EIA Power Cube 45/900). The resulting alloy pellets were then rolled to foils using a jeweler’s mill pressed between Nb foils to avoid contamination. Target irradiations were performed on a GE PETtrace at 16 MeV protons. The electroplated alloys were mounted on a custom-made solid target irradiation system with direct water-jet cooling applied to the backside of the gold disk. The alloy foils were placed on top of in a 1.2 cm diameter, 406 μm deep pocket made of Nb and sealed against a 51 μm Nb foil using a teflon O-ring. The alloys were in direct contact with the Nb foil to allow thermal conduction. At the rear of the Nb pocket is a water-cooling stream to transfer heat convectively during irradiation. Ge separation was achieved based on the difference in distribution coefficients between Ge, Ga, Zn, Cu, Ni and Co at different HNO3 molarities in DGA resin (Triskem International). Initial tests on the resin were performed after two pilot irradiations on natural gallium (a,b). a) 16 MeV protons were directed downward on an external beam-line (−30 °) onto 640 mg of molten elemental natGa pooled on a water-cooled niobium support. b) 330 mg natGa pellet was melted in the same Nb pocket well used with the alloys and was also sealed against a 51 μm Nb foil. The irradiated gallium was left to decay for 2 weeks and then was dissolved in 6 mL of concentrated HNO3. The solution was then passed through 200 mg of DGA resin packed in a 5 mm diameter column at a flow rate of 1.1 mL/min. A separation profile for Ge, Ga and Zn was obtained by collecting 0.2–1.0 mL fractions, which were analyzed by gamma ray spectroscopy on a HPGe detector. Two thick NiGa4 foils have been irradiated, one for 69Ge production and for radiocobalt, from 58Ni(p,α), separation quantification; and the other one for 68Ge production with the idea of preparing a mini-generator (< 13 MBq) of 68Ga for local use in phantom imaging work and animal studies. Results and Conclusion A) Each electroplating batch consisted of 66.5 ± 2.9 mg of Ga2O3 mixed with 44.9 ± 3.6 mg of NiSO4.6H2O (n = 9) in the 15 mL plating cell. Higher concentrations resulted in inefficient electroplating yields due to precipitation. 66 ± 6 % of the total Ga+Ni mass in solution, that is 39.5 ± 3.3 mg of Ga-Ni was deposited after 3 d. Three plating batches over one disk resulted in a maximum target thickness of 86.7 mg/cm2. A fourth batch did not add any significant amount of alloy and salt precipitation became a problem. The electroplated surface looked homogeneous at 10× magnification on a microscope and the targets were able to withstand up to 30 μA without presenting any dark spots. B) Alloys with Ga:Ni molar ratios of 1.0, 2.0, 2.9, 3.7 and 5.2 were fused by induction heating. TABLE 1 summarizes the results from manipulating these foils. These alloys were analyzed by X-ray fluorescence using a 109Cd excitation source quantifying the x-rays peaks: 9.26 keV for Ga and 7.48 keV for Ni. A linear relationship between the ratio of count rates of these two peaks to the alloy Ga:Ni molar ratio was found and employed for the characterization of the electroplated Ga-Ni layers. Results from the irradiations over natGa on Nb supports are presented in TABLE 2. TABLE 3 presents the results from irradiating two thick NiGa4 foils made by induction heating. Figure 1 contains the separation profile with DGA. 91% of the 68Ge is eluted in 2 mL of de-ionized water. We developed two simple methods for NiGa4 alloy manufacture. With a melting point > 800 °C and 80% presence of natGa, it is a more convenient target for 68Ge production compared to Ga encapsulated in Nb. The separation method based on the extraction resin DGA yields similar results as the liquid-liquid extraction method mentioned in [6,7], but we believe this is a more convenient method since it only requires a single trap-and-release step and not many extraction steps.

Page generated in 0.3249 seconds