Spelling suggestions: "subject:"AMPA deceptors"" "subject:"AMPA geceptors""
1 |
An investigation of non-NMDA glutamate receptors : using novel derivatives of the amino acid, willardiineHawkins, Lynda Mary January 1996 (has links)
No description available.
|
2 |
AMPA receptor activation and deactivation : a study of protein : ligand interactions of the GluR2 ligand binding core by x-ray crystallography /January 2002 (has links)
Licentiatafhandling.
|
3 |
An investigation of developmental changes in the subcellular distribution of glutamate receptorsArchibald, Karen January 1999 (has links)
No description available.
|
4 |
Ubiquilin-2 associates with ubiquitinated AMPA receptors for proteasomal degradationSreeram, Aparna 09 August 2019 (has links)
Ubiquilin (UBQL) is a member of type 2 ubiquitin-like (UBL) protein family. They structurally contain an N-terminal ubiquitin-like domain and a C-terminal ubiquitin-associated (UBA) domain. Ubiquilin 2 (UBQL2) physically associates with poly ubiquitinated proteins and delivers them to the proteasome for degradation. This protein has been shown to play an important role in the regulation of aggregation and degradation of various neurodegenerative disease-associated proteins. In this study, we looked into the role of the ubiquilin-2 proteins in the AMPA receptor ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation pathway. Our results indicate that UBQL2 overexpression decreases AMPAR levels in neurons and also reduces GluA1 expression in HEK 293T cells. Moreover, by co-immunoprecipitation we found that UBQL2 interacts with ubiquitinated AMPARs. We, therefore propose that UBQL2 brings AMPARs to the proteasome for degradation. Consistent with this notion, expression of UBQL2 P497H, a mutant form incapable of interaction with proteasome, causes accumulation of AMPA receptors. These results indicate a role for UBQL2 in associating with and directing ubiquitinated AMPA receptors to the proteasome for degradation. / 2020-08-09T00:00:00Z
|
5 |
Role of AKAP5 in postsynaptic signaling complexesZhang, Mingxu 01 July 2010 (has links)
Noradrenergic signaling has important functions in the central nervous system (CNS) with respect to emotion, learning and memory. Activation of β- adrenergic receptors (β ARs) stimulates protein kinase A via Gs-protein, adenylyl cyclase, and cAMP. Synaptic β←2 -adrenergic receptors, targets of the neurotransmitter norephinephrin, are associated with the GluA1 subunit of AMPA-type glutamate receptors, which mediate most excitatory synaptic transmission in mammalian CNS. PKA-mediated phosphorylation of GluA1 on Ser845 is important for GluA1 surface expression, activity induced postsynaptic accumulation, and synaptic plasticity. Postsynaptic localization of PKA is mediated by a major scaffolding protein `A kinase anchor protein 5 (AKAP5)'. AKAP5 associates with AMPA receptors via SAP97 and PSD95.
We have two strains of AKAP5 mutant mice: AKAP5 knockout and AKAP5 D36. AKAP5 KO mice have a complete loss of AKAP5 gene expression. D36 mice miss the last 36 residues (PKA binding site) of AKAP5 but without affecting other interactions. These mutant mice provide us with appropriate in vivo models for studying the functional roles of AKAP5.
We compared the functional and physical association of β2AR and AMPA receptors among wild type, AKAP5 KO, and AKAP5 D36 mice. Although AKAP5 was not necessary for the assembly of the β2AR / GluA1 complex, we found that AKAP5 anchored PKA activity was required for full β2AR stimulation-induced GluA1 Ser845 phosphorylation. Recording and analysis of field EPSPs (fEPSPs) of CA1 pyramidal neurons with brief bath perfusion of the β2AR agonist isoproterenol indicated a role of AKAP5 anchored PKA in the regulation of postsynaptic AMPAR responses by norephinephrin.
Moreover, we observed a delayed extinction of contextual fear memory in AKAP5 D36 mice, which suggests the involvement of AKAP5 anchored PKA in memory formation and modification.
|
6 |
Regulation of hippocampal synaptic transmission and receptor trafficking by adenosine in hypoxia and ischemia: role of protein phosphatases 1, 2A and 2B, casein kinase 2 (CK2), and equilibrative nucleoside transporters (ENTs).2014 September 1900 (has links)
The role of adenosine as an endogenous neuromodulator is well established, but the mechanism(s) mediating the extensive modulatory and regulatory actions of adenosine have not yet been fully elucidated. In fact, although adenosine, through activation of adenosine A1 and A2A receptors, has been demonstrated as neuroprotective or neurodegenerative, respectively, little is known about the mechanism by which adenosine mediates these actions. In the hippocampus, essential physiological processes rely on adenosine signaling, including regulation of long-term potentiation (LTP) and long-term depression (LTD). Neuromodulation by adenosine is dominantly inhibitory in the hippocampus, mediated by the abundant and high-affinity adenosine A1 receptor. In ischemia and hypoxia, A1 receptor activation induces rapid synaptic depression which is mediated by multiple signaling pathways including the induction of excitatory AMPA glutamate receptor internalization, which inhibits synaptic transmission in the hippocampus. Considerable effort has been devoted to investigating the role of adenosine in ischemic stroke, due to the fact that in cerebral ischemia or hypoxia, extracellular levels of adenosine increase dramatically. This thesis explores the functional consequences of adenosine signaling in hypoxia and ischemia, which mediate GluA1 AMPA receptor subunit internalization. Three major serine/threonine protein phosphatases (PPs), PP1, PP2A, and PP2B are investigated and shown to mediate A1 receptor-mediated GluA1 internalization in hypoxic conditions in the rat hippocampus. Further experiments demonstrate the role of adenosine A2A receptors in potentiating hippocampal synaptic transmission in reperfusion by increasing GluA1 surface expression through increased phosphorylation of regulatory C-terminal phosphorylation sites of GluA1. The mechanism of extracellular adenosine regulation by equilibrative nucleoside transporters (ENTs) and casein kinase 2 (CK2) are examined and shown to interact in hypoxia/reperfusion experiments on hippocampal slices. Finally, using a pial vessel disruption (PVD) permanent focal cortical ischemia stroke model, experiments demonstrate increased adenosine tone in the hippocampus, which mediates increased adenosine-induced synaptic depression. CK2 inhibition was also neuroprotective after 20min hypoxia. This shows that adenosine tone is increased in the hippocampus after a small cortical stroke, implying a potential global effect of focal ischemia. Together, these studies further reveal the paramount role of adenosine as a neuromodulator in the hippocampus during neuronal insults, furthering our understanding of the mechanism of neuronal death in hypoxic and ischemic conditions.The role of adenosine as an endogenous neuromodulator is well established, but the mechanism(s) mediating the extensive modulatory and regulatory actions of adenosine have not yet been fully elucidated. In fact, although adenosine, through activation of adenosine A1 and A2A receptors, has been demonstrated as neuroprotective or neurodegenerative, respectively, little is known about the mechanism by which adenosine mediates these actions. In the hippocampus, essential physiological processes rely on adenosine signaling, including regulation of long-term potentiation (LTP) and long-term depression (LTD). Neuromodulation by adenosine is dominantly inhibitory in the hippocampus, mediated by the abundant and high-affinity adenosine A1 receptor. In ischemia and hypoxia, A1 receptor activation induces rapid synaptic depression which is mediated by multiple signaling pathways including the induction of excitatory AMPA glutamate receptor internalization, which inhibits synaptic transmission in the hippocampus. Considerable effort has been devoted to investigating the role of adenosine in ischemic stroke, due to the fact that in cerebral ischemia or hypoxia, extracellular levels of adenosine increase dramatically. This thesis explores the functional consequences of adenosine signaling in hypoxia and ischemia, which mediate GluA1 AMPA receptor subunit internalization. Three major serine/threonine protein phosphatases (PPs), PP1, PP2A, and PP2B are investigated and shown to mediate A1 receptor-mediated GluA1 internalization in hypoxic conditions in the rat hippocampus. Further experiments demonstrate the role of adenosine A2A receptors in potentiating hippocampal synaptic transmission in reperfusion by increasing GluA1 surface expression through increased phosphorylation of regulatory C-terminal phosphorylation sites of GluA1. The mechanism of extracellular adenosine regulation by equilibrative nucleoside transporters (ENTs) and casein kinase 2 (CK2) are examined and shown to interact in hypoxia/reperfusion experiments on hippocampal slices. Finally, using a pial vessel disruption (PVD) permanent focal cortical ischemia stroke model, experiments demonstrate increased adenosine tone in the hippocampus, which mediates increased adenosine-induced synaptic depression. CK2 inhibition was also neuroprotective after 20min hypoxia. This shows that adenosine tone is increased in the hippocampus after a small cortical stroke, implying a potential global effect of focal ischemia. Together, these studies further reveal the paramount role of adenosine as a neuromodulator in the hippocampus during neuronal insults, furthering our understanding of the mechanism of neuronal death in hypoxic and ischemic conditions.
|
7 |
MOLECULAR FACTORS THAT INFLUENCE THE BINDING OF AGONISTS TO AMPA RECEPTORSMontgomery, Kyle Everett 01 January 2009 (has links)
AMPA receptors mediate excitatory synaptic transmission throughout the central nervous system via activation by their natural agonist glutamate. Several other molecules have been recognized as receptor agonist or antagonist, and recently allosteric modulators have been developed that potentiate the currents generated by these receptors. The goal of this thesis has been to address specific and as yet unresolved questions regarding the binding interactions between the AMPA receptors and these classes of molecules. For instance AMPA receptors are seemingly converted to have lower affinity for agonist as they move towards synapses and we evaluate two hypotheses put forward to explain the molecular mechanisms responsible for this. Additionally, guanine nucleotides competitively inhibit AMPA receptors and a second goal has been to further characterize guanine nucleotide binding, and to create mutations that selectively diminish this so that the function of the inhibition can be evaluated. A third goal has been to characterize the molecular factors that influence the effects of the allosteric modulators in order to explain why their efficacy differs greatly between brain regions. Experiments pertaining to these three goals were carried out sequentially and are described below as Projects 1 (guanine nucleotide inhibition), Project 2 (agonist affinity), and Project 3 (allosteric modulators). Project 1. Guanine nucleotides competitively inhibit AMPA-Rs (AMPA receptors) and because this inhibition is ubiquitous among virtually all types of glutamate receptors from fish to mammals, it likely serves a physiological function. Evaluation of this would be greatly facilitated if nucleotide binding could be eliminated through mutations without altering other aspects of receptor function, or if compounds were discovered that selectively prevent nucleotide binding. It was previously reported that a lysine in the chick kainate binding protein (cKBP) is specifically involved in guanine nucleotide binding. Therefore we mutated the homologous lysine (K445) in AMPA-R subunit GluR1 plus 12 additional residues around the glutamate binding pocket with the expectation that this would reduce nucleotide binding even further. Nucleotide affinity was determined by measuring the displacement of [3H]fluorowillardiine. As expected, the guanine nucleotide affinity was decreased about five-fold in R1-K445A mutants and the agonist affinity was seemingly unchanged. However, when tested by electrophysiology, characteristics of the mutant such as desensitization and the EC50 for glutamate were found to be altered. None of the other mutations were more successful at decreasing nucleotide affinity selectively. Nonetheless, these studies have given new insight into the docking mode of guanine nucleotides. The loss of binding in R1-K445A was much larger for GTP and GDP than for GMP, and guanosine binding, which is much lower, was unaffected by the mutation. These data suggest that the first phosphate of GMP determines the higher affinity of the phosphorylated nucleotides, and that K445 stabilizes the binding of the second and third phosphates of GDP and GTP. This along with various other observations suggest that the guanine base docks deep within the agonist binding pocket and that bulky additions, such as the phosphates, are accommodated by projecting out of the cleft in the vicinity of lysine 445. However, the exact docking mode of guanine nucleotides would have to be determined by crystallography. Project 2. Agonist binding to AMPA-R in brain consists of a high and low affinity components with KDs of 9-28 nM and 190-700 nM. Previous studies have suggested that newly synthesized receptors have high affinity and are converted to lower affinity by a secondary process. Two particular processes have been implicated, namely the conversion of receptor glycosylation from immature to complex, and modulation by receptor associated proteins. Both hypotheses were evaluated in this project using homomeric receptors GluR1-4 expressed in HEK 293 cells. The role of glycosylation was tested mostly with GluR4 receptors because they are expressed in distinct populations that exhibit either immature or complex glycans and their binding consists of high and low affinity components similar to those previously seen in brain receptors. Cells were treated with castanospermine or deoxymannojirimycin to decrease the proportion of receptors with complex glycosylation, or with cycloheximide plus chloroquine to increase the number of receptors with complex glycosylation. Although 70% of receptors from cells treated with cyloheximide/chloroquine exhibited complex glycans compared to <5% with other treatments, the affinity decreased at most 2-fold. Also, the low affinity component was nearly 80% of the total binding in receptors that exhibited virtually no complex glycans. Taken together these data indicate that complex glycosylation is not the key factor that confers low affinity. To test the second hypothesis GluR1i or GluR2i were co-expressed with stargazin which associates to receptors in neurons and affects their kinetics and trafficking. Considering the affinities of the two components seen in brain, we expected stargazin to cause a 20-fold or greater decrease in binding affinity. This was not the case, however our results did suggest that stargazin caused the appearance of a low affinity component but this was small and remained largely masked by the more abundant high affinity component. Recently, experiments with brain membranes have revealed preliminary evidence that an associated protein of ~85kDa may cause receptors to have low affinity. This hypothesis is currently under investigation. Project 3. Ampakines are cognitive enhancers that potentiate AMPA receptor currents at excitatory synapses. The efficacy of these drugs varies substantially among neurons in different brain regions, being for example about three times larger in the hippocampus than in the thalamus. Binding assays have shown that these compounds also increase the affinity of receptors for agonists. Importantly, the efficacy of these drugs to increase synaptic responses and agonist binding exhibit a positive correlation. Indeed, we have found that the increase in agonist binding (Emax) induced by the prototypical ampakine CX546 is highly variable across eight brain regions and that there is a 3-fold difference between the hippocampus and the thalamus which is similar to the difference reported for physiological efficacy. Therefore, binding assays or receptor autoradiography can potentially be used to predict the physiological efficacy of these drugs in a particular brain region. An important goal of this project has been to identify factors that may be responsible for the regionally different efficacies. Ampakines show some preference for receptor subunits but various considerations suggest that other factors must be involved. In this project we evaluated the role of a novel class of proteins called TARPs (transmembrane AMPA receptor regulatory proteins) that have recently been discovered to be tightly associated with AMPA receptors and to regulate their kinetics. Four of these proteins, named lambda;2(stargazin),λ3,λ4,and λ8 are abundant in the brain, but they exhibit highly selective regional distribution. We determined the maximum increase in agonist binding (Emax ) caused by saturating CX546 in three different AMPA receptor subunits, GluR1i, GluR2i, and GluR4i without and with co-expression of the four TARPs. Without TARPs, both Glu2i and GluR4i showed an Emax value of 100% over baseline binding. Co-expression of TARPs increased the Emax in GluR2i and this was largest for λ3 and λ8 (~130%). However, TARPs decreased the Emax of CX546 in GluR4i and this was most notable with λ2 and λ4 (~72%). Agonist binding in GluR1i was increased by only 15% and it was not significantly changed by TARPs. The expression patterns of TARPs and AMPA-R subunits in the brain have been partially characterized in the literature. Thus, it was previously reported that GluR4i transcripts are abundant in the thalamus but minor in the hippocampus. Using western blots we confirmed that this is also true for protein content; in the thalamus expression of GluR1, GluR2, GluR3, and GluR4 was 4%, 33%, 40%, and 147% respectively, of that in the hippocampus. When considering the known expression patterns of TARP variants, the hippocampus can be described as being enriched in GluR2, λ3 and λ8 while GluR4, λ2 and λ4 are prevalent in the thalamus. In comparison between these specific subunit/TARP combinations, the Emax values for those representative of the hippocampus (GluR2i/λ3 or λ8) were ~2-times larger than the Emax values of thalamic combinations (R4i/λ2 or λ4). Thus we can conclude that the differences in the expression of both TARP variants and AMPA-R subunits are critical factors for determining the variable efficacy of ampakines across brain regions.
|
8 |
Role of calcium influx through glutamate receptors in white matter brain injury and oligodendrocyte regenerationKhawaja, Rabia Raheel January 2019 (has links)
Calcium-influx through ionotropic glutamate receptors expressed on non-excitable cells, such as CNS glia, may regulate important cell events via intracellular signaling mechanisms. Oligodendrocytes and oligodendrocyte progenitors (OPCs), two glial populations supporting CNS myelination and myelin repair, express AMPA and NMDA receptors. Although calcium-influx through these receptors is thought to cause glutamate excitotoxicity to oligodendrocytes in CNS injuries, more recent studies suggest that AMPA or NMDA receptor-mediated synaptic transmission between neurons and OPCs plays a positive role in neuronal activity-dependent oligodendrocyte development and regeneration. Given the opposing roles of glutamate receptors in oligodendrocyte death and repair, the clinical relevance of these receptors in white matter injuries remain unclear. Another major challenge for exploring the role of these receptors in white matter injuries is that OPCs and neurons express a similar complement of AMPA and NMDA receptor subunits, which has complicated the interpretation of pharmacological manipulations and global genetic deletion approaches. To define the cell autonomous role of AMPA and NMDA receptor-mediated calcium signaling in oligodendroglia, I abolished the calcium influx through glutamate receptors using two different genetic approaches, and examined their impacts on oligodendrocyte development, injury-induced cell death, and regeneration. First, I employed a new mouse line which allows overexpression of GluA2, the calcium-impermeable AMPA receptor subunit, in a Cre activity-dependent manner. After crossing these mice with OPC- or oligodendrocyte-lineage-specific Cre mice, I applied hypoxic-ischemic injury to these multiple transgenic mice. Surprisingly, even though AMPA receptor-mediated calcium influx was blocked in OPCs, oligodendrogenesis or myelin integrity was not affected. However, GluA2 overexpression significantly promoted oligodendrocyte regeneration and OPC proliferation after injury, while the same manipulation in oligodendrocytes did not protect them from the initial cell loss. Moreover, GluA2 overexpression also stimulated transcriptional activities linked to myelinogenesis, even without injury. Second, I used conditional knockout mice for Grin1, the gene encoding an essential subunit of NMDA receptor complexes. As with GluA2 overexpressing mice, the removal of NMDA receptors from OPCs or all oligodendroglia did not significantly change normal oligodendrocyte development. However, the ablation of NMDA receptor in OPCs exacerbated oligodendrocyte loss by impairing new oligodendrogenesis in hypoxic-ischemic injury. These results suggest that neither AMPA receptors nor NMDA receptors mediate glutamate excitotoxicity in oligodendrocytes in neonatal hypoxic-ischemic injury. Instead, these receptors play distinct roles in post-injury oligodendrocyte development: AMPA receptor-mediated calcium suppresses oligodendrocyte regeneration, and NMDA receptor signaling supports oligodendrocyte regeneration after injury. / Biomedical Sciences
|
9 |
The mechanistic link between Arc/Arg3.1 expression and AMPA receptor endocytosisWall, M.J., Corrêa, Sonia A.L. 07 September 2017 (has links)
Yes / The activity-regulated cytoskeleton associated protein (Arc/Arg3.1) plays a key role in determining synaptic strength through facilitation of AMPA receptor (AMPAR) endocytosis. Although there is considerable data on the mechanism by which Arc induction controls synaptic plasticity and learning behaviours, several key mechanistic questions remain. Here we review data on the link between Arc expression and the clathrin-mediated endocytic pathway which internalises AMPARs and discuss the significance of Arc binding to the clathrin adaptor protein 2 (AP-2) and to endophilin/dynamin. We consider which AMPAR subunits are selected for Arc-mediated internalisation, implications for synaptic function and consider Arc as a therapeutic target. / The work in S.A.L.C. laboratory is supported by the BBSRC (BB/H018344/1 and BB/J02127X/1) and Wellcome Trust 200646/Z/16/Z. The work in M.J.W. Laboratory is supported by ERUK.
|
10 |
Acute inhibition of AMPA receptors by perampanel reduces amyloid β-protein levels by suppressing β-cleavage of APP in Alzheimer’s disease models / ペランパネル急性投与によるAMPA型グルタミン酸受容体の抑制は、アルツハイマー病モデルマウスにおいてAPPβ切断を抑制し、アミロイドβタンパク質を減少させるUeda, Sakiho 25 March 2024 (has links)
京都大学 / 新制・論文博士 / 博士(医学) / 乙第13608号 / 論医博第2318号 / 新制||医||1073(附属図書館) / 京都大学大学院医学研究科医学専攻 / (主査)教授 井上 治久, 教授 村井 俊哉, 教授 高橋 淳 / 学位規則第4条第2項該当 / Doctor of Medical Science / Kyoto University / DFAM
|
Page generated in 0.0501 seconds