Thesis (M.S.)--Ohio University, August, 1994. / Title from PDF t.p.

Digitized by Kansas Correctional Industries

Thesis (M.S. in Operations Research)--Naval Postgraduate School, September 1990. / Thesis Advisor(s): Lindsay, Glenn F. Second Reader: Bailey, Michael P. "September 1990." Description based on title screen as viewed on December 21, 2009. DTIC Identifier(s): Quality control, sampling, acceptance tests, production control, theses, mathematical models, vendors. Author(s) subject terms: Markov chain, P-chart, fraction nonconforming vs AQL. Includes bibliographical references (p. 50). Also available in print.

No description available.

Analysis of several acceptance sampling procedures is performed and improvement of the procedures is sug- gested in this thesis. The issue of an efficient calculation of exact (P1, P2) single sampling plans for sampling by variables and exact LTPD and AOQL single sampling plans for sampling by variables when the rejected lots are inspected is addressed. The calculation of the plans is done using exact formula for operating characteristic of acceptance sampling plan and the new plans have better characteristics compared to the plans computed in a usual way using just approximately valid formula for operating characteristic. The tables of plans calculated according to procedures suggested in this thesis are provided for a couple of input parameters combinations. Tools designed for working with acceptance sampling plans, tools for analysis and calculation of acceptance sampling plans is one of the outputs of this thesis. R language and environment for statistical computations was chosen for implementation. The tools are satisfactorily efficient and may be easily used even for acceptance sampling plans tables computation. Newly defined functions in R are supplied including their source code and basic documentation so that acceptance sampling plans can be computed as demanded in case that the particular input parameters set is out of the scope covered in the tables of plans provided here.

No description available.

Statistical quality control is the application of statistical methods to problems for which it is of interest to evaluate, establish, or verify the quality of a product. The two basic areas of statistical quality control that have received both the greatest attention in the literature and the widest acceptance in industry are acceptance sampling and statistical process control. In the majority of such techniques, a single characteristic of an item is used to describe its quality. In such cases, one of two basic types of product quality measures is typically used: attributes product quality measures and variables product quality measures. Variables product quality measures evaluate an item’s quality by measuring its quality characteristic on a continuous scale. Attributes product quality measures assign a 0 to an item if its characteristic is conforming to some specification, and 1 if its characteristic is nonconforming. Although attributes and variables product quality measures have many appropriate applications, there are many situations m which product quality is best described by classifying a single characteristic of the item using three or more discrete levels. A multilevel discrete product quality measure is a function that assigns a numerical value to such an item corresponding to the level in which it is classified. Several acceptance sampling plans and control charts that incorporate the use of multilevel discrete product quality measures are defined here. In addition to the multilevel discrete product quality measure, each of the defined methods utilizes a quality value function. A quality value function assigns a numerical value to an item based on the classification it receives from the multilevel discrete product quality measure. Each of the defined multilevel acceptance sampling plans and multilevel control charts is evaluated with respect to its probabilistic behavior. In addition, the problem of parameter selection and quality value function specification is addressed for each of the defined techniques. The cases considered are the 3-level case, the 4-level case, and the general j-level case. / Ph. D.