Diploma thesis is devoted to the theme of Czech administrative justice, its current form and comparison with chosen models of European administrative justice, that is with French and German model. Goal of the thesis is on the basis of description and analysis of these models of administrative justice to get the comparison and evaluation of the differences and positive and negative elements of chosen models in relation to Czech system of administrative justice. The first part focuses on rather theoretical side and the introduction to this problem. Fundamental terms and characteristics are described and the concept of administrative justice is put to a broader scope. There is also mentioned the historical development of administrative justice in the Czech lands from year 1848 until the present day. The second part is devoted to the study of specific current legislation of chosen countries - Czech Republic, France and Germany. On this foundation is in the closing part accomplished the analysis and comparison of particular systems of administrative justice together with stating their mutual positives and negatives.

La résolution des litiges est couramment considérée comme une fonction exclusivement juridictionnelle. Les recours portés devant les juridictions sont appelés recours contentieux et la procédure juridictionnelle serait la procédure contentieuse. Devant l’administration, la procédure serait non contentieuse et les recours seraient des pétitions gracieuses. Or, tant l’administration française que l’administration colombienne tranchent quotidiennement des litiges dans l’exercice d’une fonction contentieuse qui n’est pas nouvelle. Dès lors, l’exclusivité juridictionnelle du contentieux n’est qu’une vision déformée de l’organisation du pouvoir. La résolution administrative des litiges est l’une des prérogatives de puissance publique dont dispose l’administration. Elle se caractérise par son caractère accessoire de la mission administrative principale; il s’agit d’un instrument de la réalisation des finalités de l’action administrative. L’administration tranche les litiges dans l’exercice de sa fonction administrative : les décisions administratives contentieuses n’ont pas force de chose jugée, pouvant être l’objet du contrôle juridictionnel qui décidera définitivement le litige. Cette fonction administrative est conforme à la théorie de la séparation des pouvoirs dont l’interprétation séparatiste ne se réalise ni en France ni en Colombie. Cependant, l’administration n’exerce pas sa fonction contentieuse à chaque fois qu’un recours administratif est exercé, qu’une procédure de sanction administrative est entamée ou qu’un litige opposant deux particuliers est porté à la décision de l’administration. L’activité contentieuse de l’administration exige qu’un véritable contentieux soit présenté à l’administration, que ce contentieux se matérialise devant l’administration et qu’elle tranche unilatéralement le fond du litige. Dans ce cas, l’administration n’exerce une fonction ni matériellement juridictionnelle ni quasi contentieuse, mais une véritable fonction contentieuse. / Dispute resolution activity is commonly considered as a wholly judicial function. Judicial actions against the administration and the procedure followed by Courts would be referred as “contentious”, while actions and procedures before administrative bodies would be described as “non-contentious”. Still, both Colombian and French administrations may resolve disputes on a daily basis as a result of longstanding “contentious” missions. Therefore, a vision that reduces this “contentious” to the solely judicial activity distorts this reality in power organization theory. The administrative resolution of disputes is an incidental prerogative of the public administration. It is characterized by its attachment to the main administrative mission, it is an instrument for the purposes of administrative action. The administration resolves disputes as part of its administrative function: administrative “contentious” decisions have not the force of a final judgment, and could be subject to judicial review. Administrative “contentious” missions seem to conform to a non-rigid vision of the separation of powers shared by Colombian and French systems. However, the administration does not performs a “contentious” activity every time an administrative action or an administrative sanction procedure is undertaken, or when it has to decide a controversy opposing two individuals. Administrative “contentious” activity demands a real “contentious” to be materialized before the administration, which also decides the bottom of the dispute. In that case, the administration does not perform a judicial or quasi-judicial mission, but just a real “contentious” mission

Made available in DSpace on 2014-06-11T19:26:20Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 Previous issue date: 2011-03-24Bitstream added on 2014-06-13T18:54:39Z : No. of bitstreams: 1 celeste_m_me_fran.pdf: 1557933 bytes, checksum: b66a41904242fa2080853afe0a1e22c2 (MD5) / Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) / A ocupação da região das Cabeceiras do Rio Pardo – atualmente correspondente às cidades paulistas de Caconde, São José do Rio Pardo, São Sebastião da Grama, Tapiratiba e Divinolândia – teve seu povoamento iniciado em 1765, ano em que o governador de São Paulo, Luis Antonio de Sousa Botelho Mourão, o Morgado de Mateus, enviou uma diligência com o intuito de pesquisar o ouro que ali havia e garantir a posse da região. Concomitantemente, deu-se um deslocamento populacional para essa área em busca das catas de ouro e de terras para o plantio. Nesse movimento, estabeleceu-se o povoado de N. S. da Conceição do Rio Pardo, que em 1775 foi elevado a freguesia. Esse núcleo populacional correspondeu aos limites da Vila de Caconde (SP) que, no início do século XIX, centralizou os bairros rurais surgidos nas suas proximidades. A integração desse espaço ao território paulista foi acelerada pela expansão da agricultura de exportação na região paulista conhecida como quadrilátero da cana. Transformação essa que se dera no final do século XVIII, possibilitada pela economia de abastecimento interno desenvolvida em algumas regiões de São Paulo, a partir do século XVII. O surgimento de práticas agrícolas voltadas ao mercado internacional ocorreu, sobretudo no período pombalino e no governo de Morgado de Mateus. Quando D. José I assumiu o trono de Portugal, uma série de medidas foram tomadas com o objetivo de que o país alcançasse a riqueza de nações como a Inglaterra e a França, fortalecendo também sua presença na América Portuguesa. Nesta última, as políticas que objetivavam esse avanço se deram grandemente em torno do fomento agrícola, que aos poucos começou a surtir efeito, sobretudo nas regiões do Centro-Sul. Foi esse o caso da Capitania de São Paulo que, entre 1760 e 1770, passou a registrar seus primeiros produtos agrícolas para exportação pelo porto de Santos / The settlement of Rio Pardo headwaters region, which nowadays corresponds to cities located in the state of São Paulo such as: Caconde, São José do Rio Pardo, São Sebastião da Grama, Mococa Tapiratiba and Divinolândia, started in 1765; this was year when the governor of Sao Paulo, Luis Antonio de Souza Botelho Mourão, the Morgado de Mateus (his noble title), sent a stagecoach in order to find gold in this site and also in order to secure the possession of the region. There was, at the same time, a population shift to this area, which consisted of people in search of gold and land for planting. In this movement, the village of N. S. Conceição do Rio Pardo was established, which, in 1775, became a municipal sub-district. This population center corresponded to the limits of the Caconde Village (SP) which was, during the early nineteenth century, the center of the rural districts which appeared in its vicinities. The integration of this space to the São Paulo state area was accelerated by the expansion of export agriculture in the region of the state of São Paulo which was known as the cane quadrangle. This transformation had occurred in the late eighteenth century, and it was made possible by the development of an economy of domestic supply in some regions of São Paulo, which had begun in the seventeenth century. The emergence of agricultural practices geared to international markets occurred primarily in the pombalino period and during the government of Morgado de Mateus. When D. Joseph I assumed the throne of Portugal, a number of measures were taken so that the country of Portugal would be able to reach the same wealth of nations such as England and France; thus, strengthening its presence in the Portuguese America. In the latter, the policies aimed at advances were largely due to the promotion of agriculture, which gradually began to yield results, especially in South-Central regions