Spelling suggestions: "subject:"aerospace vehicle design"" "subject:"erospace vehicle design""
1 |
Design synthesis for canard-delta combat aircraftSerghides, V. C. January 1987 (has links)
This thesis presents the development of a computerized design synthesis for canard-delta combat aircraft. This is complementary to, and follows the philosophy of, an existing RAE system for conventional combat aircraft with swept wings (Ref. 1). The background to the work and the Research Programme objectives and limitations are initially examined. The design of a baseline canard-delta combat aircraft is then described together with all the assumptions and decisions which led to its final configuration. The philosophy behind the progressive evolution of the aircraft geometry and packaging modules from the baseline configuration is explained in detail. The development of detailed modules for the estimation of the aircraft aerodynamics and performance is then presented. A full description of the investigations into the effects of canard-delta interference on the aircraft aerodynamics is also included. The mathematical content of the aircraft geometry, packaging, aerodynamics and performance modules is presented separately in the appendices in greater detail. The development and architecture of the design synthesis and graphics programs are finally presented and the program operation is described with the aid of flow-charts. A comprehensive user's manual and a design example are also provided.
|
2 |
Preparing students to incorporate stakeholder requirements in aerospace vehicle designCoso, Alexandra Emelina 22 May 2014 (has links)
The design of an aerospace vehicle system is a complex integration process driven by technological developments, stakeholder and mission needs, cost, and schedule. The vehicle then operates in an equally complex context, dependent on many aspects of the environment, the performance of stakeholders and the quality of the design itself. Satisfying the needs of all stakeholders is a complicated challenge for designers and engineers, and stakeholder requirements are, at times, neglected in design decisions. Thus, it is critical to examine how to better incorporate stakeholder requirements earlier and throughout the design process. The intent of this research is to (1) examine how stakeholder considerations are currently integrated into aerospace vehicle design practice and curricula, (2) design empirically-informed and theoretically-grounded educational interventions for an aerospace design capstone course, and (3) isolate the characteristics of the interventions and learning environment which support students’ integration of stakeholder considerations.
The first research phase identified how stakeholder considerations are taken into account within an aerospace vehicle design firm and in current aerospace engineering design curricula. Interviews with aerospace designers revealed six conditions at the group, interaction and individual levels affecting the integration of stakeholder considerations. Examining current curricula, aerospace design education relies on quantitative measures. Thus, many students are not introduced to stakeholder considerations that are challenging to quantify. In addition, at the start of an aerospace engineering senior design capstone course, students were found to have some understanding of the customer and a few contextual considerations, but in general students did not see the impact of the broader context or of stakeholders outside of the customer. The second research phase comprised the design and evaluation of a Requirements Lab and Stakeholders in Design Labs, two in-class interventions implemented in a senior aircraft design capstone course. Further, a Stakeholders in Design rubric was developed to evaluate students’ design understanding and integration of stakeholder considerations and, as such, can be used as a summative assessment tool. The two interventions were evaluated using a multi-level framework to examine student capstone design projects, a written evaluation, and observations of students’ design team meetings. The findings demonstrated an increase in students’ awareness of a diverse group of stakeholders, but also perceptions that students appeared to only integrate stakeholder considerations in cases where interactions with stakeholders were possible and the design requirements had an explicit stakeholder focus. Particular aspects of the aircraft design learning environment such as the lack of explicit stakeholder requirements, the differences between the learning environment in the two semesters of the course, and the availability of tools impacted students’ integration of stakeholder considerations and overall effectiveness of the interventions. This research serves as a starting point for future research in pedagogical techniques and assessment methods for integrating stakeholder requirements into technology-focused design capstone courses. The results can also inform the vehicle design education of students and engineers from other disciplines.
|
Page generated in 0.0724 seconds