Spelling suggestions: "subject:"apologetics."" "subject:"apologeticus.""
121 |
Apologetics on the World Wide Web /Tofte, Glenn W. January 1998 (has links)
Thesis (M.A.)--Trinity International University, 1998. / Abstract. Includes a critical analysis of the "Leadership University" web site. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 83-89).
|
122 |
From probability to certainty the witness of the Holy Spirit and the defense of the Bible in Presbyterian and Reformed apologetics, 1870-1920 /Bristley, Eric D., January 1989 (has links)
Thesis (Th. M.)--Westminster Theological Seminary, Philadelphia, 1989. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 192-205).
|
123 |
Die natürliche Gotteserkenntnis bei Laktanz und seinem apologetischen VorgängernBender, Albrecht, January 1900 (has links)
Thesis (doctoral)--Justus-Liebig-Universität Giessen, 1982. / Vita (on cover), with authors name: Albrecht Gustav Reinhold Bender. Includes bibliographical references (p. 218-227).
|
124 |
Die natürliche Gotteserkenntnis bei Laktanz und seinem apologetischen VorgängernBender, Albrecht, January 1900 (has links)
Thesis (doctoral)--Justus-Liebig-Universität Giessen, 1982. / Vita (on cover), with authors name: Albrecht Gustav Reinhold Bender. Includes bibliographical references (p. 218-227).
|
125 |
The Noetic effects of sin in John Calvin's doctrine of the knowledge of God with its implications for the apologetic methodology of B.B. Warfield and Cornelius Van Til /Schultz, Thomas Allen. January 1987 (has links)
Thesis (M.A.)--Covenant Theological Seminary, 1987. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 127-132).
|
126 |
Die rol van voorveronderstellings in die denke van Van Til en Stoker toegepas op vertrekpunte in die Apologetiek / Izak Human ScholtzScholtz, Izak Human January 2013 (has links)
The purpose of reformed apologetics is to defend the Christian faith against heresy.However, this is not all. Reformed apologetics also wants to give a convincing answer why the Christian view is the real hope for mankind (see 1 Peter 3:15).Other that differ from this life and world view, do it mostly based on a different starting point. Although finer points are debated between parties, the starting point, including presuppositions, are always somewhere in the background.
Van Til4 and Stoker5, two famous Reformed thinkersof the last century (respectively theological and philosophical), in contact with other made their presuppositions part of their apologetic discussions. This agreement in approach and method emerges in the Festschrift for Van Til, when Stoker (1971:28-71) proposes a connection between his and Van Til’s methods, and when Van Til in turn responds positively.
This study will focus on what role these two thinkers’ presuppositions play in their apologetic conversation. It eventually comes to important guidelines regarding the place and role of presuppositions in conversations of Christians across a broad scientific front with those who hold other points of departure. / MTh (Missiology), North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2014
|
127 |
Die rol van voorveronderstellings in die denke van Van Til en Stoker toegepas op vertrekpunte in die Apologetiek / Izak Human ScholtzScholtz, Izak Human January 2013 (has links)
The purpose of reformed apologetics is to defend the Christian faith against heresy.However, this is not all. Reformed apologetics also wants to give a convincing answer why the Christian view is the real hope for mankind (see 1 Peter 3:15).Other that differ from this life and world view, do it mostly based on a different starting point. Although finer points are debated between parties, the starting point, including presuppositions, are always somewhere in the background.
Van Til4 and Stoker5, two famous Reformed thinkersof the last century (respectively theological and philosophical), in contact with other made their presuppositions part of their apologetic discussions. This agreement in approach and method emerges in the Festschrift for Van Til, when Stoker (1971:28-71) proposes a connection between his and Van Til’s methods, and when Van Til in turn responds positively.
This study will focus on what role these two thinkers’ presuppositions play in their apologetic conversation. It eventually comes to important guidelines regarding the place and role of presuppositions in conversations of Christians across a broad scientific front with those who hold other points of departure. / MTh (Missiology), North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2014
|
128 |
A study of the educational rights movement and Christian apologetics in China in the 1920's =Tong, Fung-ping., 湯鳳萍. January 2005 (has links)
published_or_final_version / abstract / Chinese Historical Studies / Master / Master of Arts
|
129 |
Israel Zangwill as an ApologistRichman, Harvey A. 08 1900 (has links)
Israel Zangwill, novelist, playwright, poet, and essayist, can be understood and appreciated best as an apologist whose chosen mission was to introduce the Jew to the English-speaking reader, a reader who had often see the word Jew on the pages of his literature but seldom had been able to meed an authentic specimen of the group in--or out--of print. This thesis will describe the works of Zangwill from an apologetic standpoint.
|
130 |
A Comparative Critique of the Moral Philosophies of Alasdair MacIntyre and John HareFreeman, Russell H. 12 January 2016 (has links)
This dissertation argues that the Aristotelianism of Alasdair MacIntyre is more cogent than the prescriptive realism of John Hare. Chapter 1 introduces the relationship between moral philosophy and apologetics and presents the thesis of the dissertation. Chapter 2 surveys the Aristotelian elements of MacIntyre’s moral philosophy and provides an argument that these aspects of MacIntyre’s philosophy provide his Aristotelianism with significant explanatory scope. Chapter 3 continues an analysis of MacIntyre’s philosophy. The argument of this chapter is that the Thomist elements of MacIntyre’s philosophy further the explanatory scope of his Aristotelianism. The chapter concludes with a response to two major objections. Chapter 4 presents the moral philosophy of John Hare and argues that three areas that appear to provide explanatory scope do not. Chapter 5 summarizes the Kantian elements of John Hare’s moral philosophy. The argument of chapter 6 is that the primary argument of MacIntyre’s moral philosophy is sounder than the primary argument of John Hare’s moral philosophy. Chapter 7 provides the conclusion of the dissertation and explores the implications of MacIntyre’s Aristotelianism for Christian apologetics.
|
Page generated in 0.0509 seconds