No description available.

No description available.

No description available.

No description available.

No description available.

Introduction: Due to our actual knowledge tinnitus in most cases results from abnormal neural activity elicited at any level of auditory pathways and is interpreted in auditory cortex as a perception of sound, which is not accompanied by any mechanic activity within the cochlea. Tinnitus patients usually present various degrees of cochlear dysfunction, which can be manifested as sensorineural hearing loss, loudness intolerance, a distinct decrease of the DPOAE amplitude, recruitment or abnormal efferent reduction of OAEs through contralateral acoustic stimulation. But 8-15% of tinnitus patients present normal audiometric profiles. In these patients the mechanism of tinnitus generation remains unclear. Aim of the study: The aim of the study was to assess DPOAE levels and EHF thresholds in tinnitus subjects with normal hearing and compare the data with those from a normally hearing control group without tinnitus, in order to evaluate if any detectable high frequency cochlear dysfunction might be responsible for the tinnitus generation. Material and methods: 175 tinnitus patients (group 1 – tinnitus in left ear - 47 patients, group 2 – tinnitus in right ear – 23 patients, group 3 – bilateral tinnitus – 105 patients) and 60 controls (group 4). Inclusion criteria: age up to 40, normal otoscopic examination, type A tympanometry, normal hearing (up to 20 dB) in PTA (250-8000 Hz), no loudness intolerance, constant tinnitus for at least 6 months of stable localization (site of tinnitus has not changed from the previous localization). In each patient high frequency audiometry (at 10, 12.5, 14 and 16 kHz) and DPOAE registration (L1=65 dB SPL, L2=55 dB SPL, f2/f1= 1.2, S/N≥3 dB) were performed. Then statistical analysis was applied for comparison between left and right ears in the same group and also across different group of patients. Results: statistically significant differences were observed mainly in unilateral tinnitus group. These differences were more evident in audiometric data than DPOAE data. Leftsided tinnitus was twice more frequent than right-sided tinnitus. Few statistically significant differences were found between bilateral tinnitus group and controls. Conclusions: Unilateral tinnitus in normally hearing individuals may be caused by the damage of the basal region of the cochlea. There is greater incidence of high frequency hearing loss (above 8 kHz) in the ear with tinnitus in comparison to control group. In unilateral tinnitus group, the organ of Corti at the site of tinnitus is more seriously damaged than in the opposite ear. The asymmetry of cochlear damage may be crucial for tinnitus lateralization. Bilateral tinnitus, more frequently than unilateral one, can result from other pathologies, not connected with the organ of Corti.

No description available.

Book Summary: Chermak and Musiek's two-volume, award-winning handbooks are back in newly revised editions. Extensively revised and expanded, Volume II provides expanded coverage of rehabilitative and professional issues, detailing intervention strategies for children and adults. Volume I provides comprehensive coverage of the auditory neuroscience and clinical science needed to accurately diagnose the range of developmental and acquired central auditory processing disorders in children, adults, and older adults. Building on the excellence achieved with the best-selling 1st editions which earned the 2007 Speech, Language, and Hearing Book of the Year Award the second editions include contributions from world-renowned authors detailing major advances in auditory neuroscience and cognitive science; diagnosis; best practice intervention strategies in clinical and school settings; as well as emerging and future directions in diagnosis and intervention.

Abstract: Several alternative ear-canal measures are similar to absorbance in their requirement for prior determination of a Thévenin-equivalent sound…

Excerpt: How do audiologists decide which manufacturing brand they will use when dispensing hearing aids to patients? Based on ideology and methodology from the field of consumer behavior, this article offers insight into the decision-making processes used by clinical audiologists in today's field of practice. To begin, it is necessary to briefly review recent and relevant trends in this area.