Spelling suggestions: "subject:"authority inn art"" "subject:"authority iin art""
1 |
Art and authority : aspects of Russian art since 1917Thompson, Rowan Douglas January 1991 (has links)
From Introduction: The Artist was denied any role in Plato's Republic because of his ability to impair reason by imitating reality through his works. Aristotle, however, welcomed the artist because of his ability to express ideas about society through artistic form. Ernst Fischer agrees with the latter view, "Art enables man to comprehend reality, and not only helps him to bear it but increases his determination to make it more human and more worthy of mankind. Art is itself a social reality, society needs the artist ... and it has a right to demand of him that he should be conscious of his social function" (Fischer: 1963:46). Fischer adds to Aristotle's view by stating that society has a right to demand a social function from the artist. This issue has been the subject of controversial debate throughout the history of art. In a society based on class, the classes try to recruit art to serve their particular purposes. Art is seen by some as a powerful weapon - a means by which people can be swayed towards certain ideals. At the time of the Counter Reformation Italian artists were given strict instructions by the Jesuits on how to persuade and educate the people with their paintings. Napoleon urged his men of letters, painters and architects to refer to the classical ideals of ancient Greece and Rome to shape the emergent French Republic. The French philosopher, Dennis Diderot, stressed the futility of art unless it expressed great prinCiples or lessons for the spectator. Ideals of justice, courage and patriotism were embodied in the Neo-Classical movement. The didactic paintings of Jacques Louis David portray the above ideals. History records several attempts by those in power to coerce artists into conforming to their idea of society, indicating that authoritative manipulation of the arts is not purely a twentieth century phenomenon. This thesis intends to examine aspects of Russian art since 1917. Because Soviet art was dominated by policies which enabled authorities to determine its content, its history raises ideological issues which are relevant to the study of art. The theories of Suprematism, Constructivism and Socialist Realism will be discussed and conclusions will be drawn as to whether these theories succeeded as art movements which were ostensibly designed for the improvement of mankind. Present attitudes toward the visual arts in Russia will also be examined. However, in order to examine the above it is necessary to place the development of art into historical perspective.
|
2 |
From thirteenth-century Toulouse to fifteenth-century Serres a comparative study on dissent, authority and architecture /Salgirli, Saygin. January 2009 (has links)
Thesis (Ph. D.)--State University of New York at Binghamton, Department of Art History, 2009. / Includes bibliographical references.
|
3 |
Inside out/outside in: (sexual diversity : a comparative case study of two post-secondary visual art students)Honeychurch, Kenn Gardner 11 1900 (has links)
While a number of recent studies have addressed the overall educational
experiences of larger groups of gay and/or lesbian students within institutions of higher
learning, there are no in-depth studies which address the experiences of a small number of
gay men and/or lesbians who are students in programs of visual art. This comparative case
study of two gay male students of visual art considers three primary questions: what are
the ways in which individual subjectivities and cultural practices of white, gay, male artists
inter-relate; what is the impact of each artist's cultural productions on the broader culture
in which they are located; and, what are the experiences of each subject within the postsecondary
visual art's program in which each was enrolled. Data was collected through
formal interviews, participant-observation, and an examination of the art practices of each
subject.
This study draws on the contributions, and the inter-relationships, of feminist,
postmodernist, and queer theory literatures. In response to the first primary question, this
study identifies: a range of denominators by which the subjects name themselves; four
categories by which affiliated communities might be identified; a strong positive
relationship between individual subjectivities and the practices of art. Second, this study
concludes that: public response to the art practices of dissident subjects may vary in terms
of mediums and methods; the relationship between language and visual art is variant
between the two artists but the embeddedness of language in visual art is recognized; the
subjects hold opposing views with respect to the role of the art object within culture, but,
in both cases, the art object is seen as being integral, positively or negatively, to individual
identities; art is a means to cultural knowledge, that is, visual art may serve as a means of
articulating various queered theoretical standpoints; and finally, that the possibilities of
camp are a means by which queer identities may be articulated and constituted in visual art
practices. In response to the third primary research question, this study concludes that:
there is either a lack of gay or queer content matter and expertise, or a strong negative
reaction against queer experience in the programs of visual art presently considered; and
finally, that the university is a site of cultural practice which continues to be a major
legitimizer of social authority.
In general terms, with respect to epistemologies, research methodologies, and
texts, a number of necessary adaptations emerge which reflect the unique experiences of
queer researchers engaged in the production of social knowledges with queer subjects.
The research findings suggest that the incorporation of the needs of queer students into
the Academy and the Arts would prove valuable, not only to students who so define
themselves, but, because different perspectives reflect different and expanded knowledges,
would contribute to the learning/living experiences of all post-secondary students of visual
art. Recommendations for further research include continuing inquiry which similarly
considers the experiences of lesbians in visual arts programs, and for larger scale studies
with gay and/or lesbian students which may provide alternate kinds of data.
|
4 |
Inside out/outside in: (sexual diversity : a comparative case study of two post-secondary visual art students)Honeychurch, Kenn Gardner 11 1900 (has links)
While a number of recent studies have addressed the overall educational
experiences of larger groups of gay and/or lesbian students within institutions of higher
learning, there are no in-depth studies which address the experiences of a small number of
gay men and/or lesbians who are students in programs of visual art. This comparative case
study of two gay male students of visual art considers three primary questions: what are
the ways in which individual subjectivities and cultural practices of white, gay, male artists
inter-relate; what is the impact of each artist's cultural productions on the broader culture
in which they are located; and, what are the experiences of each subject within the postsecondary
visual art's program in which each was enrolled. Data was collected through
formal interviews, participant-observation, and an examination of the art practices of each
subject.
This study draws on the contributions, and the inter-relationships, of feminist,
postmodernist, and queer theory literatures. In response to the first primary question, this
study identifies: a range of denominators by which the subjects name themselves; four
categories by which affiliated communities might be identified; a strong positive
relationship between individual subjectivities and the practices of art. Second, this study
concludes that: public response to the art practices of dissident subjects may vary in terms
of mediums and methods; the relationship between language and visual art is variant
between the two artists but the embeddedness of language in visual art is recognized; the
subjects hold opposing views with respect to the role of the art object within culture, but,
in both cases, the art object is seen as being integral, positively or negatively, to individual
identities; art is a means to cultural knowledge, that is, visual art may serve as a means of
articulating various queered theoretical standpoints; and finally, that the possibilities of
camp are a means by which queer identities may be articulated and constituted in visual art
practices. In response to the third primary research question, this study concludes that:
there is either a lack of gay or queer content matter and expertise, or a strong negative
reaction against queer experience in the programs of visual art presently considered; and
finally, that the university is a site of cultural practice which continues to be a major
legitimizer of social authority.
In general terms, with respect to epistemologies, research methodologies, and
texts, a number of necessary adaptations emerge which reflect the unique experiences of
queer researchers engaged in the production of social knowledges with queer subjects.
The research findings suggest that the incorporation of the needs of queer students into
the Academy and the Arts would prove valuable, not only to students who so define
themselves, but, because different perspectives reflect different and expanded knowledges,
would contribute to the learning/living experiences of all post-secondary students of visual
art. Recommendations for further research include continuing inquiry which similarly
considers the experiences of lesbians in visual arts programs, and for larger scale studies
with gay and/or lesbian students which may provide alternate kinds of data. / Education, Faculty of / Curriculum and Pedagogy (EDCP), Department of / Graduate
|
Page generated in 0.0708 seconds