Submitted by Automa??o e Estat?stica (sst@bczm.ufrn.br) on 2017-04-03T23:22:20Z No. of bitstreams: 1 GleyssonMatiasDeAssis_DISSERT.pdf: 1359858 bytes, checksum: fe9b88f922668d56c2a5d194da819485 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Arlan Eloi Leite Silva (eloihistoriador@yahoo.com.br) on 2017-04-12T00:40:00Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 GleyssonMatiasDeAssis_DISSERT.pdf: 1359858 bytes, checksum: fe9b88f922668d56c2a5d194da819485 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2017-04-12T00:40:00Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 GleyssonMatiasDeAssis_DISSERT.pdf: 1359858 bytes, checksum: fe9b88f922668d56c2a5d194da819485 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017-02-10 / O objetivo deste trabalho foi de avaliar, atrav?s de um ensaio mec?nico, a resist?ncia da fixa??o na osteotomia sagital do ramo mandibular (OSRM) em tr?s diferentes movimentos de avan?o mandibular, bem como a influ?ncia do movimento associado a rota??o hor?rio do plano mandibular, utilizando miniplacas (4 e 6 elos) e parafusos com 6 mm de comprimento, do sistema 2.0 mm (Egimplan? ). Dois tipos de avan?os foram empregados (6 e 12 mm), utilizando hemimand?bulas de poliuretano com OSRM padronizadas de f?brica, divididos em 5 grupos: G1(Teste 1) - avan?o linear de 6 mm/ 1 placa e 4 parafusos; G2 (Teste 2) - avan?o linear de 12 mm/1 placa e 4 parafusos; G3 (Teste 3)- avan?o linear de 12 mm /2 placas e 8 parafusos; G4 (Teste 4) - avan?o de 12 mm, associado a rota??o hor?ria do plano mandibular(15?) / 1 placa e 4 parafusos; G5 (Teste 5) - avan?o de 12 mm, associado a rota??o hor?rio do plano mandibular(15?)/2 placas e 8 parafusos. As hemimand?bulas foram submetidas a uma carga compressiva vertical na regi?o de primeiro molar e a for?a aplicada, em Newtons, foi registrada nos deslocamentos de 1mm, 5 mm e 10 mm, como tamb?m a for?a m?xima aplicada entre 1 e 10 mm. Utilizando um intervalo de confian?a de 95%, as m?dias de for?a foram obtidas e os grupos foram comparados entre si. Os testes estat?sticos utilizados foram o Kruskal-Wallis* para a an?lise de todos os grupos e o de Mann-Whitney** para o comparativo de dois grupos em separado. Os resultados mostraram que o grupo G3 apresentou m?dias de for?a maiores (p < 0,001*), sendo, portanto, o mais resistente entre os grupos. Quando foi utilizado apenas 1 placa para a fixa??o da hemimandibula, no avan?o de 12 mm, a realiza??o da rota??o hor?ria foi mais resistente do que no movimento linear, nos deslocamentos de 1, 5 e 10 mm (p< 0,05**), n?o resultando em diferen?a estat?stica apenas no deslocamento m?ximo (p= 0,112**). Em um grande avan?o (12mm) houve uma perda de resist?ncia importante na fixa??o, sendo necess?rio compensar essa situa??o com uso de mais fixa??o e a rota??o hor?rio nesses casos tamb?m acrescentaram resist?ncia na OSRM, apenas nos casos em que se utiliza uma ?nica placa. / The objective of this study was to evaluate by means of mechanical testing the fixation strength in sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) for three different movements of mandibular advancement, as well as the influence of movement associated with clockwise rotation of the mandibular plane, using miniplates (4 and 6 holes) and 6-mm screws of the 2.0 mm system (Engimplan?). Two types of advancement were employed (6 and 12 mm) using polyurethane hemimandibles with factory-standardized SSO, divided into five groups: G1 (test 1) ? linear advancement of 6 mm/1 plate and 4 screws; G2 (test 2) ? linear advancement of 12 mm/1 plate and 4 screws; G3 (test 3) ? linear advancement of 12 mm/2 plates and 8 screws; G4 (test 4) ? advancement of 12 mm associated with clockwise rotation of the mandibular plane (15?)/1 plate and 4 screws; G5 (test 5) ? advancement of 12 mm associated with clockwise rotation of the mandibular plane (15?)/2 plates and 8 screws. The hemimandibles were submitted to a vertical compressive load in the region of the first molar and the force applied (in Newton) was recorded for displacements of 1, 5 and 10 mm, as was the maximum force applied between 1 and 10 mm. Using a 95% confidence interval, the mean force values were obtained and compared between groups. The Kruskal-Wallis* test was used for analysis of all groups and the Mann-Whitney** test for the comparison of two groups. The results showed higher mean force values for G3 (p < 0.001*), which was therefore the treatment that provided the greatest strength. When only 1 plate was used for fixation of the hemimandible, in the advancement of 12 mm, clockwise rotation resulted in a greater fixation strength than the linear movement for displacements of 1, 5 and 10 mm (p < 0.05**), with no significant difference being observed only for the maximum displacement (p = 0.112**). Important loss of strength in fixation was observed for the large advancement (12 mm) and it was necessary to compensate this situation with the use of more fixation. Clockwise rotation added strength to the SSO only in cases in which a single plate was used.

Submitted by Automa??o e Estat?stica (sst@bczm.ufrn.br) on 2017-10-05T00:11:27Z No. of bitstreams: 1 VictorDinizBorboremaDosSantos_DISSERT.pdf: 2006909 bytes, checksum: bac53377cdf34bb2c1b4d10fc273d846 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Arlan Eloi Leite Silva (eloihistoriador@yahoo.com.br) on 2017-10-16T21:50:04Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 VictorDinizBorboremaDosSantos_DISSERT.pdf: 2006909 bytes, checksum: bac53377cdf34bb2c1b4d10fc273d846 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2017-10-16T21:50:04Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 VictorDinizBorboremaDosSantos_DISSERT.pdf: 2006909 bytes, checksum: bac53377cdf34bb2c1b4d10fc273d846 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017-07-19 / Coordena??o de Aperfei?oamento de Pessoal de N?vel Superior (CAPES) / O objetivo deste trabalho foi avaliar, atrav?s de um ensaio biomec?nico a resist?ncia da fixa??o na osteotomia sagital do ramo mandibular (OSRM) em dois tipos de avan?os (6 e 12 mm), associados ou n?o a rota??o do plano oclusal, utilizando placas e parafusos do sistema 2.0 mm. Foram utilizadas hemimand?bulas de poliuretano, com OSRM padronizadas, divididos em 7 grupos: Avan?o linear de 6 mm / 1 placa e 4 parafusos (G1); avan?o linear de 12 mm/1 placa e 4 parafusos (G2); avan?o linear de 12 mm /2 placas e 8 parafusos (G3); avan?o de 12 mm, associado a rota??o hor?ria do plano oclusal / 1 placa e 4 parafusos (G4); avan?o de 12 mm, associado a rota??o hor?rio do plano oclusal/2 placas e 8 parafusos (G5); avan?o de 12 mm, associado ao giro anti-hor?rio do plano oclusal / 1 placa e 4 parafusos (G6); - avan?o de 12 mm, associado ao giro anti-hor?rio do plano oclusal/2 placas e 8 parafusos (G7). As hemimand?bulas foram submetidas a uma carga compressiva vertical na regi?o de primeiro molar e a for?a aplicada, em Newtons, foi registrada nos deslocamentos de 1mm, 5 mm e 10 mm, bem como tamb?m a for?a m?xima. Utilizando um intervalo de confian?a de 95%, as medianas de for?a foram obtidas e os grupos foram comparados entre si. Os testes estat?sticos utilizados foram o Kruskal-Wallis* para a an?lise de todos os grupos e o de Mann-Whitney** para o comparativo de dois grupos separadamente. Os resultados mostraram que, segundo o teste de Kruskall-Wallis houve diferen?as entre os grupos. Ficou demonstrado que o aumento da magnitude do avan?o mandibular diminuiu a resist?ncia da osteoss?ntese na OSRM quando se utilizou um ?nico dispositivo de fixa??o. A inser??o de uma placa adicional em grandes avan?os (G3, G5 e G7), aumentou significativamente a resist?ncia do m?todo de osteoss?ntese de uma maneira geral, quando comparada aos demais grupos. Em grandes avan?os com modifica??o do plano oclusal fixados com uma ?nica placa (G4 e G6), houve um aumento significativo da resist?ncia da fixa??o apenas no movimento de rota??o hor?ria. A rota??o anti-hor?ria do plano oclusal foi significativamente mais resistente que a hor?ria, quando se utilizou 2 placas na estabiliza??o da OSRM. / The aim of this study was to evaluate the resistance of fixation in the sagittal osteotomy of the mandibular ramus (OSRM) when performing great advances (12 mm), as well as the influence of the movement associated with the anticlockwise/clockwise rotation of the occlusal plane , Using plates and screws of the 2.0 mm system. Two types of advances were used (6 and 12 mm) using polyurethane hemimandibulars, with standardized OSRM, divided into 7 groups: G1 - linear advance of 6 mm / 1 plate and 4 screws; G2 - linear advance of 12 mm / 1 plate and 4 screws; G3 - linear advance of 12 mm / 2 plates and 8 screws; G4 - 12 mm advance, associated with clockwise rotation of the occlusal plane (15 ?) / 1 plate and 4 screws; G5 - 12 mm advance, associated with clockwise rotation of the occlusal plane (15 ?) / 2 plates and 8 screws; G6 - 12 mm advance, associated with anticlockwise rotation of the occlusal plane (15 ?) / 1 plate and 4 screws; G7 - 12 mm advance, associated with the counterclockwise rotation of the plane (15 ?) / 2 plates and 8 screws. The hemimandibules were submitted to a vertical compressive load in the first molar region and the applied force in Newtons was recorded in the displacements of 1mm, 5mm and 10mm, as well as the maximum force applied between 1 and 10mm. Using a 95% confidence interval, the means of strength were obtained and the groups were compared to each other. The statistical tests used were Kruskal-Wallis for the analysis of all groups and the Mann-Whitney test for comparison of two groups separately. The results showed that, according to the Kruskall-Wallis test, there were differences between groups. When only 1 plate was used for the fixation of the hemimandibula, at the 12 mm advance, the clockwise rotation was more resistant than in the linear movement, at the displacements of 1, 5 and 10 mm (p <0.05 **), Not resulting in statistical difference only in the maximum displacement (p = 0.112 **). In a large advance (12mm) there was a significant loss of resistance in the FIR, being necessary to compensate this situation with use of more fixation and the clockwise/counterclockwise rotation in these cases also added resistance in the OSRM, only in cases where a single plate is used. The counter-clockwise turn proved to be less sturdy than the clockwise rotation when fixed with one plate and more resistant when fixed with 2 plates. Both situations presented statistical significance with p <0.05. In view of these findings, it was concluded that regardless of movement, the fixation with 2 plates considerably increases the resistance to applied force.