• Refine Query
  • Source
  • Publication year
  • to
  • Language
  • 2
  • 2
  • Tagged with
  • 5
  • 5
  • 4
  • 3
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 1
  • About
  • The Global ETD Search service is a free service for researchers to find electronic theses and dissertations. This service is provided by the Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations.
    Our metadata is collected from universities around the world. If you manage a university/consortium/country archive and want to be added, details can be found on the NDLTD website.
1

ARHGAP4 is a spatially regulated RhoGAP that inhibits NIH/3T3 cell migration and dentate granule cell axon outgrowth

Vogt, Daniel L. 06 July 2007 (has links)
No description available.
2

The Role of Repulsive Guidance Molecule b (RGMb) in the Developing Chick Visual Sytem

Sidhu, Nicole 26 November 2012 (has links)
Our work on RGMb demonstrates a clear and new role in the developing chick visual system. RGMb is expressed in distinct areas of the developing visual system: retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) of the retina, which are the only cells in the visual system that extend axons to the brain, as well as newly differentiated neuronal cells within the optic tectum (OT), the primary target of RGC axons. Knockdown of RGMb in RGCs at embryonic day 2 (E2) resulted in aberrant axon projection at E17, indicating that RGMb is required for axon development. Furthermore, knockdown of RGMb in the optic tectum at E5 resulted in disrupted cellular migration at E9, demonstrating that RGMb is involved in correct cell migration. Lastly, we demonstrated that RGMb binds to the Fibronectin III (3,4) domain of Neogenin, which provides a basis for determining the mechanism through which RGMb exerts its biological effects.
3

The Role of Repulsive Guidance Molecule b (RGMb) in the Developing Chick Visual Sytem

Sidhu, Nicole 26 November 2012 (has links)
Our work on RGMb demonstrates a clear and new role in the developing chick visual system. RGMb is expressed in distinct areas of the developing visual system: retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) of the retina, which are the only cells in the visual system that extend axons to the brain, as well as newly differentiated neuronal cells within the optic tectum (OT), the primary target of RGC axons. Knockdown of RGMb in RGCs at embryonic day 2 (E2) resulted in aberrant axon projection at E17, indicating that RGMb is required for axon development. Furthermore, knockdown of RGMb in the optic tectum at E5 resulted in disrupted cellular migration at E9, demonstrating that RGMb is involved in correct cell migration. Lastly, we demonstrated that RGMb binds to the Fibronectin III (3,4) domain of Neogenin, which provides a basis for determining the mechanism through which RGMb exerts its biological effects.
4

Contributions of Lateral Ganglionic Eminence Derivatives to Neural Circuit Assembly within the Developing Forebrain

Ehrman, Jacqueline 23 August 2022 (has links)
No description available.
5

Analysis of mig-10, a Gene Involved in Nervous System Development in Caenorhabditis elegans

Stovall, Elizabeth L. 30 April 2004 (has links)
The mig-10 gene in C. elegans is required for proper axon guidance and/or cell migration of certain neurons during development. In mig-10 (ct41) mutant worms, there is incomplete migration of the anterior lateral microtubule cells (ALMs), hermaphrodite specific neuron (HSN), left coelomocyte cells (ccL), and canal associated neuron (CAN) (Manser and Wood, 1990). The mig-10 (ct41) mutation also causes axon guidance defects in the IL2 neurons, and it enhances unc-6 defects in the axon guidance of the anterior ventral microtubule cell (AVM) (Rusiecki, 1999; C. Quinn, personal communication). mig-10's function in axon guidance and neuronal migration is unknown, but is believed to be involved in a signal transduction pathway that uses a G-protein, such as ras. The two mig-10 transcripts discussed in this thesis, mig-10 A and mig-10 B, encode proteins that are similar to Grb-7 and Grb-10 proteins, which are also believed to function in a signal transduction pathway (Manser et al., 1997). One of these similarities is the presence of a proline-rich region, which may be used to bind another protein (Manser et al., 1997). The MIG-10 A protein has an additional proline region, compared to MIG-10 B, which may indicate that the MIG-10 A and B proteins are utilized in different cells, or at different developmental stages. As a first step in learning where MIG-10 is expressed, mig-10 (ct41) mutant worms containing a wild-type mig-10 B::GFP fusion were constructed. Rescue of the mutant phenotype would indicate that the expression pattern of the transgene was similar to that of the endogenous gene. As this experiment did not allow for rescue, even after integration of the construct, a strain of worms containing a mig-10 promoter::GFP transgene was used. Preliminary observations of this strain indicated that mig-10 is expressed in neuronal tissue. The AIY neurons were observed in wild-type and mig-10 (ct41) worms to determine if they are affected by the mig-10 mutation as previously reported (O. Hobert, personal communication). As no difference was detected, the AIYs were not used in any further experiments. In order to determine which cells require functional MIG-10 protein for the proper development/migration of neurons to occur, mig-10 (ct41) worms containing mec-3 promoter::mig-10 A or B cDNA transgenes were constructed. The mec-3 promoter drives expression of the mig-10 cDNA in the ALM neurons and other touch cells early in the development of the embryo. If these transgenes rescued the ALM migration defect, then mig-10 would be acting cell autonomously in ALM. Partial rescue was obtained, which may be due to the need for both of the mig-10 transcripts to be expressed in the same cell; alternatively, one or both transcripts may need to be expressed in a cell nonautonomous fashion in addition to being expressed cell autonomously. Low production of the rescuing protein, or expression of the protein at a later developmental stage than is needed for rescue to occur, may also have been the cause of the partial rescue. Future work in this area includes putting mig-10 promoter::mig-10 A or B cDNA in mig-10 (ct41) background to investigate if the different transcripts rescue different aspects of the mig-10 phenotype. The mig-10 A and mig-10 B cDNA constructs could also be expressed in the same worm in an attempt to correct for partial rescue that may be due to the lack of both MIG-10 proteins.

Page generated in 0.0538 seconds