Introduction: Wheat is one of the most cultivated cereal grains in the world and is used for the manufacture of a wide range of food products; however its consumption has been linked to several health issues. Food products containing wheat flour commonly elicit a high glycaemic response (GR) through rapid breakdown of starch and absorption of the resulting glucose. Regular over-consumption of such foods has been linked to obesity and development of type 2 diabetes. Dietary fibre may alter GR after meal consumption indirectly through modification of chyme viscosity. Wheat can also elicit immune-mediated adverse reactions, such as immunoglobulin E(IgE)-mediated wheat allergy and coeliac disease (CD), which are most often associated with gluten proteins consisting of gliadins and glutenins. Resistance to digestion may impact the allergenicity of such protein components. Digestion of gluten and its epitopes important for CD have been enhanced in vitro and in vivo using a prolyl endopeptidase from Aspergillus niger (AnPEP) however the impact on IgE-mediated allergy has yet to be considered. Additional information is needed about the digestion of wheat. Specifically the impact of food matrix, digestion conditions and effect of AnPEP require further investigation. Methods: First, the effect of food matrix on proteolysis was tested by in vitro batch oral-gastric digestion of a purified total gliadin fraction (TGF), flour and bread. As the most physiologically relevant material, bread was also processed through the duodenal/intestinal phase in varying conditions to assess the impact of enzyme inclusions on macronutrient breakdown. Second, results from the batch digestions were compared to bread digestion in dynamic models, where the effect of natural variations in soluble fibre was also tested. Increasing levels of AnPEP were used in two in vitro batch oral-gastric models. Protein breakdown in digestions was assessed using a combination of 1D PAGE, immunoblots with a variety of wheat-specific antibodies, kinetic analysis and inhibition ELISA. Immunoassays were performed with sera from 23 wheat-allergic patients and some digestions were analysed in terms of starch digestion. Finally, LC-MS/MS was used to obtain specific sequence information and relative intensity of peptides from in vitro batch model digestions. Thus, digestion of selected allergens and key epitopes was monitored. Results and Discussion: Wheat proteins were very resistant to in vitro batch gastric digestion in bread compared to the TGF, with flour proteins somewhat intermediate. Thus, studies digesting purified proteins are not always indicative of protein digestion in a processed food matrix. Digestion of bread protein was enhanced by starch digestion and vice versa. This has implications for patients with deficiency in pancreatic amylase, which is often observed in childhood, so may play a role in food allergy development by influencing polypeptides reaching the gut mucosa. Digestion model conditions also had a large impact on wheat protein digestibility with differences observed between batch and dynamic models, and the two batch models used. This may reflect biological variations observed in vivo. Unexpectedly, the wheat cultivar with higher soluble fibre digested slightly more quickly which may be due to alterations in other macronutrients present. In most cases patient sera were poly-sensitized to a number of wheat proteins and IgE-binding was mostly unaffected by baking. Gastric digestion reduced IgE-reactivity of bread but large polypeptides of high relative intensity remained. Addition of AnPEP further reduced IgE-reactivity of digestion samples by digesting gluten proteins into smaller peptides of lower relative intensity. This reduced the presence of epitopes important for IgE-mediated allergy and CD. Therefore, AnPEP may have an application for treatment of accidental wheat consumption for patients with IgE-mediated wheat allergy.

LD2668 .T4 1954 S55 / Master of Science

Durum wheat (<i>Triticum turgidum</i> L. var. durum, 2n = 4x = 28, AABB genomes) is used predominantly for semolina and pasta products, but there is increasing interest in using durum for bread-making to provide alternative markets during periods of overproduction. The goal of this study was to characterize the bread-making quality of durum wheat cultivars and emmer (<i>Triticum turgidum</i> L. var. dicoccum, 2n = 4x = 28) derived breeding lines derived from crosses of durum wheat with an Emmer land race 97Emmer19 from Iran. Emmer-derived breeding lines were evaluated along with three high quality bread wheat (<i>Triticum aestivum</i> L., 2n = 6x = 42, AABBDD genomes) cultivars and seven durum wheat cultivars across three environments in replicated yield trials in the 2005 and 2006 growing seasons. Four 1AS.1AL-1DL translocation lines which carry the Glu-D1d allele [high molecular weight glutenin subunit (HMW-GS) pair 1Dx5+1Dy10] from chromosome 1D of bread wheat were also evaluated. In general, durum wheat cultivars with elevated gluten strength and/or increased dough extensibility were noted to have higher loaf volume (LV) than those with weaker gluten. The 1AS.1AL-1DL translocation line L252 carrying the LMW-1 banding pattern had better dough mixing stability and LV than the translocation lines with the LMW-2 banding pattern. The 1AS.1AL-1DL translocation lines had higher grain protein concentrations (GPC), but the lowest loaf volumes of all the lines tested. These translocation lines also exhibited unappealing external loaf quality (loaf shape and appearance) and poor internal loaf quality (crumb structure). Variation in bread-making quality attributes were observed among durum genotypes. 97Emmer19 exhibited higher LV than all the durum wheats evaluated and approached the loaf volume achieved with the bread wheat cultivar AC Superb. Breeding lines derived from crosses of 97Emmer19 to strong gluten durum cultivars (WB881 or AC Navigator) had higher LV than those of the durum checks. 97Emmer19 carried Glu-A1a* (HMW-GS 1Ax1) and the progeny carrying that allele generally exhibited higher loaf volumes. Durum wheat genotypes expressing the Glu-B1d (HMW-GS pair Bx6+By8) allele exhibited better overall bread-making quality compared with those expressing the Glu-B1b (HMW-GS pair Bx7+By8) allele. The durum cultivar Arcola and the emmer-derived breeding line 2000EB4, showed higher alveograph extensibility (L) values than did the bread wheat check AC Barrie. The durum wheat genotypes (with the exception of Stewart-63) and emmer-derived breeding lines exhibited better dough extensibility than the USDA-ARS 1AS.1AL-1DL translocation lines. These results indicate that there is potential to select for genotypes with improved baking quality in durum breeding programs.

Durum wheat (<i>Triticum turgidum</i> L. var. durum, 2n = 4x = 28, AABB genomes) is used predominantly for semolina and pasta products, but there is increasing interest in using durum for bread-making to provide alternative markets during periods of overproduction. The goal of this study was to characterize the bread-making quality of durum wheat cultivars and emmer (<i>Triticum turgidum</i> L. var. dicoccum, 2n = 4x = 28) derived breeding lines derived from crosses of durum wheat with an Emmer land race 97Emmer19 from Iran. Emmer-derived breeding lines were evaluated along with three high quality bread wheat (<i>Triticum aestivum</i> L., 2n = 6x = 42, AABBDD genomes) cultivars and seven durum wheat cultivars across three environments in replicated yield trials in the 2005 and 2006 growing seasons. Four 1AS.1AL-1DL translocation lines which carry the Glu-D1d allele [high molecular weight glutenin subunit (HMW-GS) pair 1Dx5+1Dy10] from chromosome 1D of bread wheat were also evaluated. In general, durum wheat cultivars with elevated gluten strength and/or increased dough extensibility were noted to have higher loaf volume (LV) than those with weaker gluten. The 1AS.1AL-1DL translocation line L252 carrying the LMW-1 banding pattern had better dough mixing stability and LV than the translocation lines with the LMW-2 banding pattern. The 1AS.1AL-1DL translocation lines had higher grain protein concentrations (GPC), but the lowest loaf volumes of all the lines tested. These translocation lines also exhibited unappealing external loaf quality (loaf shape and appearance) and poor internal loaf quality (crumb structure). Variation in bread-making quality attributes were observed among durum genotypes. 97Emmer19 exhibited higher LV than all the durum wheats evaluated and approached the loaf volume achieved with the bread wheat cultivar AC Superb. Breeding lines derived from crosses of 97Emmer19 to strong gluten durum cultivars (WB881 or AC Navigator) had higher LV than those of the durum checks. 97Emmer19 carried Glu-A1a* (HMW-GS 1Ax1) and the progeny carrying that allele generally exhibited higher loaf volumes. Durum wheat genotypes expressing the Glu-B1d (HMW-GS pair Bx6+By8) allele exhibited better overall bread-making quality compared with those expressing the Glu-B1b (HMW-GS pair Bx7+By8) allele. The durum cultivar Arcola and the emmer-derived breeding line 2000EB4, showed higher alveograph extensibility (L) values than did the bread wheat check AC Barrie. The durum wheat genotypes (with the exception of Stewart-63) and emmer-derived breeding lines exhibited better dough extensibility than the USDA-ARS 1AS.1AL-1DL translocation lines. These results indicate that there is potential to select for genotypes with improved baking quality in durum breeding programs.

This item was digitized as part of the Million Books Project led by Carnegie Mellon University and supported by grants from the National Science Foundation (NSF). Cornell University coordinated the participation of land-grant and agricultural libraries in providing historical agricultural information for the digitization project; the University of Arizona Libraries, the College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, and the Office of Arid Lands Studies collaborated in the selection and provision of material for the digitization project.

This item was digitized as part of the Million Books Project led by Carnegie Mellon University and supported by grants from the National Science Foundation (NSF). Cornell University coordinated the participation of land-grant and agricultural libraries in providing historical agricultural information for the digitization project; the University of Arizona Libraries, the College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, and the Office of Arid Lands Studies collaborated in the selection and provision of material for the digitization project.

This item was digitized as part of the Million Books Project led by Carnegie Mellon University and supported by grants from the National Science Foundation (NSF). Cornell University coordinated the participation of land-grant and agricultural libraries in providing historical agricultural information for the digitization project; the University of Arizona Libraries, the College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, and the Office of Arid Lands Studies collaborated in the selection and provision of material for the digitization project.

This item was digitized as part of the Million Books Project led by Carnegie Mellon University and supported by grants from the National Science Foundation (NSF). Cornell University coordinated the participation of land-grant and agricultural libraries in providing historical agricultural information for the digitization project; the University of Arizona Libraries, the College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, and the Office of Arid Lands Studies collaborated in the selection and provision of material for the digitization project.

This item was digitized as part of the Million Books Project led by Carnegie Mellon University and supported by grants from the National Science Foundation (NSF). Cornell University coordinated the participation of land-grant and agricultural libraries in providing historical agricultural information for the digitization project; the University of Arizona Libraries, the College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, and the Office of Arid Lands Studies collaborated in the selection and provision of material for the digitization project.

The effects of deep fat frying and oven baking on mass transfer (moisture loss and oil uptake), color and textural characteristics of chicken nuggets were studied. Deep fat frying was performed at three oil temperatures, namely 150, 170 and 190°C. The frying times were 1, 2, 3 and 4 min. Oven baking was accomplished at three temperature levels: 200, 220, and 240°C, and the baking times were 10, 15, 20 and 25 min. / Moisture content of the breading portion of the fried chicken nuggets decreased following a typical drying curve and ranged from 0.90 to 0.22 g/g (db), while the moisture content of the core portion of the chicken nuggets decreased almost linearly and ranged from 1.96 to 1.4 g/g (db). Fat contents of the breading and core portions increased linearly with time. Generally, frying temperature significantly affected the moisture contents of the breading and core. It also affected the fat content of the core but not that of the breading. (Abstract shortened by UMI.)