Spelling suggestions: "subject:"bartleby, then inscrivent"" "subject:"bartleby, them inscrivent""
1 |
Bartleby the scrivener : a critical analysisTannenbaum Glouberman, Susan. January 1980 (has links)
No description available.
|
2 |
Bartleby the scrivener : a critical analysisTannenbaum Glouberman, Susan. January 1980 (has links)
No description available.
|
3 |
Melville's "Bartleby the Scrivener": A Review of Scholarship and an InterpretationDoering, Ann H. January 1966 (has links)
No description available.
|
4 |
The Inaugural Status of Nathaniel Hawthorne’s 1852 The Blithedale Romance and Herman Melville’s 1853 “Bartleby, the Scrivener” in the development of the Topic of Alienation in American Literature: A Study of its Representations and a Comparison with its Treatment in Ernest Hemingway’s 1926 The Sun Also RisesSandoval Muñoz, Catalina January 2009 (has links)
No description available.
|
5 |
"Charity Never Faileth": Philanthropy in the Short Fiction of Herman MelvilleGoldfarb, Nancy D. January 2014 (has links)
Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI) / This dissertation analyzes the critique of charity and philanthropy implicit in
Melville’s short fiction written for periodicals between 1853 and 1856. Melville utilized narrative and tone to conceal his opposition to prevailing ideologies and manipulated narrative structures to make the reader complicit in the problematic assumptions of a market economy. Integrating close readings with critical theory, I establish that Melville was challenging the new rhetoric of philanthropy that created a moral identity for wealthy men in industrial capitalist society. Through his short fiction, Melville exposed self-serving conduct and rationalizations when they masqueraded as civic-minded responses to the needs of the community. Melville was joining a public conversation about philanthropy and civic leadership in an American society that, in its pursuit of private wealth, he believed was losing touch with the democratic and civic ideals on which the nation had been founded. Melville’s objection was not with charitable giving; rather, he objected to its use as a diversion from honest reflection on one’s responsibilities to others.
|
Page generated in 0.0768 seconds