Thesis--PlanB (M.S.)--University of Wisconsin--Stout, 2003. / Includes bibliographical references.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Nebraska-Lincoln, 2008. / Title from title screen (site viewed Mar. 5, 2009). PDF text: vi, 126 p. ; 731 K. UMI publication number: AAT 3336690. Includes bibliographical references. Also available in microfilm and microfiche formats.

Thesis--PlanB (M.S.)--University of Wisconsin--Stout, 1998. / Includes bibliographical references.

Thesis--PlanB (M.S.)--University of Wisconsin--Stout, 1998. / Includes bibliographical references.

Thesis--PlanB (M.S.)--University of Wisconsin--Stout, 2002. / Includes bibliographical references.

In the 1980s and 1990s, publications like A Nation at Risk and Prisoners of Time were highly critical of the American public school system. In response, school administrators reviewed their master schedules to evaluate how time was scheduled and the majority of them chose block scheduling to secure longer, uninterrupted periods of instructional time. Upon implementing block scheduling, schools noted a need for a change in pedagogy. Constructivist teaching, shown to be effective with multiple ages, has become a preferred pedagogy for elementary and middle school teachers during a block period. The review of literature includes a description of the forces behind block scheduling and provides a background of constructivist theory and teaching practices based on the writings of Jean Piaget and Lev Vygotsky. Combining constructivist teaching with block scheduling creates an environment conducive to young adolescent learning; however, properly preparing teachers through professional development is key to effective implementation. The purpose of this action research study was to facilitate the professional growth of new teachers by providing job embedded professional development opportunities that were grounded in constructivist practices and demonstrated to be effective with young adolescent learners while teaching in a block period. / Ed. D.

Educators across the nation are rethinking the organization of the high school day in relation to time as they face the challenges of a new century. Block scheduling, the use of extended periods of time for learning, is one response to the reorganization of the high school where in Virginia during the 2000-2001 school year, 74% of the high schools were on some form of block scheduling. Two models of block scheduling continue to receive attention in the review of educational literature. They are the alternating day or A-B model and the 4 x 4 model. Although there are numerous qualitative research studies regarding the effects of block scheduling on school climate and student achievement, there is limited quantitative evidence that supports the use of block scheduling to improve student academic achievement on criterion-referenced standardized test scores. This study compared the effects of the 7-period alternating day schedule, the 4 x 4 block schedule, and the traditional single-period schedule on high school student academic achievement as measured by the Virginia Stanards of Learning (SOL) end-of-course assessments. An Analysis of Variance was used as the primary tool to test for mean differences between the test scores. The results indicated that the mean scaled scores for the 7-period alternating day were significantly higher (p<.05) than the mean scaled scores for the 4 x 4 block on the English:Reading, English:Writing, and geometry SOL end-of-course tests. In addition, the mean scaled scores for the 7-period alternating day and the traditional schedule were significantly higher (p<.05) than the 4 x 4 block on the English:Writing SOL end-of-course tests. It appears that the 7-period alternating day schedule has merit in terms of English and geometry instruction. Division and school leaders will want to explore the effects of the 7-period alternating day schedule on English and geometry courses. As a new century unravels, the question of time and how it is used for student learning will continue to be a major focus. Educational leaders must continue to work together with teachers to design and to develop a high school schedule that will provide a maximum learning experience for all students. / Ed. D.

Thesis (M.Ed.)--Memorial University of Newfoundland, 2001. / Bibliography: leaves 75-82.

The purpose of this study was to examine the graduation rates of secondary schools in Indiana in 1989-90 and to compare those graduation rates to those of 199798, to see if those schools that adopted block scheduling had experienced a difference in graduation rates either positively or negatively. A comparison was also made of graduation rates between schools adopting block scheduling for at least three years and traditional schools during this same time period. Further examination was made to determine if any specific type of block schedule had improved graduation rates. The size school was also a consideration as to the affect of block scheduling on graduation rates. The study also sought to determine if block scheduling had an impact on attendance rates, discipline incidents, pupil teacher ratio, or full time teacher equivalency, all factors aligned to reasons why students drop out of school.The population for this study consisted of 251 Indiana public secondary schools, 203 schools which maintained a traditional schedule and 48 schools identified by the Indiana Department of Education to have adopted block scheduling prior to or including 1995-96, 1996-97, 1997-98. Nine research questions accompanied by Null Hypotheses for each were determined and tested. All data collection were from the Indiana Department of Education through reports compiled and generated from information submitted annually by all public schools in Indiana. / Department of Educational Leadership

Thesis (Ed. D.)--University of North Texas, May, 2007. / Title from title page display. Includes bibliographical references.