Kritische Knochendefekte stellen heutzutage ein ungelöstes Problem in der klinischen Praxis dar, da die verfügbaren prothetischen Optionen oft die mechanische Anpassung an das Gewebe nicht gewährleisten oder zu wichtigen immunologischen und Implantat-bedingten Komplikationen führen. In diesem Kontext ermöglichen Tissue Engineering-Ansätze neue Strategien, um in vitro Zell-Material Interaktionen zu untersuchen und so die Implantatmaterialien zu optimieren. In dieser Arbeit habe ich Zell-Material Interaktionen eines neuen Kollagen-basierten Scaffolds untersucht, das langfristig als Trägerstruktur für eine zellbasierte Therapie für kritische Knochendefekte entwickelt werden soll. Im Rahmen der Dissertation konnte ich belegen, dass die Kollagen-basierten makroporöse Mikrocarrier für die Zellvermehrung humaner mesenchymaler Stammzellen (MSC) und deren osteogene Differenzierung unter GMP Bedingungen verwendet werden können. Außerdem habe ich die die Kokultur von hämatopoietischen Stammzellen des Knochenmarks und multiplen Myelomzellen funktionell charakterisiert. Ich konnte erstmals Kulturbedingungen etablieren, die die Langzeitkultur ohne die Verwendung von Zytokinen ermöglicht. Mittels dieser Kokultur konnte ich ein Knochenmarknischen-Modell etablieren und die Untersuchung der Expression von zentralen Signalkaskaden der Homöostase dieser Nische untersuchen. Ich konnte die Expression von zwei verschiedenen Isoformen von Osteopontin nachweisen, die in Tiermodellen nicht gefunden werden. Diese Isoformen des Osteopontins habe ich kloniert und die rekombinanten Isoformen exprimiert und ihre Rollen in der Homöostase der Knochenmarknische untersucht. Critical size bone defects represent nowadays an unresolved problem in the clinical practice, where the available prosthetic options often lack adequate mechanical matching to the host tissue or lead to important immunological and implant-related complications. In this context, Tissue Engineering approaches promise more effective strategies to study cell-material interactions in vitro and consequently optimize implant materials. In this work, I investigated the cell-scaffold interactions of a new collagen-based scaffold for a putative cell-based therapy for critical size defects to be developed. In the context of this thesis, I could demonstrate that the collagen-based macroporous microcarriers could be employed for the expansion and osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) under GMP-compliant conditions. Moreover, I functionally characterized the co-culture of bone marrow hematopoietic stem cells and multiple myeloma cells. I was for the first time able to establish culture conditions allowing their long-term culture in absence of externally supplemented cytokines. Using this co-culture, I was able to establish a bone marrow niche model to investigate the expression of key signaling pathways involved in the niche´s homeostasis. I was able to demonstrate the expression of two different isoforms of Osteopontin, that could not previously be detected in animal models. Finally, I cloned these Osteopontin isoforms, expressed recombinant versions of the isoforms, and investigated their roles in the homeostasis of the bone marrow niche. / Kritische Knochendefekte stellen heutzutage ein ungelöstes Problem in der klinischen Praxis dar, da die verfügbaren prothetischen Optionen oft die mechanische Anpassung an das Gewebe nicht gewährleisten oder zu wichtigen immunologischen und Implantat-bedingten Komplikationen führen. In diesem Kontext ermöglichen Tissue Engineering-Ansätze neue Strategien, um in vitro Zell-Material Interaktionen zu untersuchen und so die Implantatmaterialien zu optimieren. In dieser Arbeit habe ich Zell-Material Interaktionen eines neuen Kollagen-basierten Scaffolds untersucht, das langfristig als Trägerstruktur für eine zellbasierte Therapie für kritische Knochendefekte entwickelt werden soll. Im Rahmen der Dissertation konnte ich belegen, dass die Kollagen-basierten makroporöse Mikrocarrier für die Zellvermehrung humaner mesenchymaler Stammzellen (MSC) und deren osteogene Differenzierung unter GMP Bedingungen verwendet werden können. Außerdem habe ich die die Kokultur von hämatopoietischen Stammzellen des Knochenmarks und multiplen Myelomzellen funktionell charakterisiert. Ich konnte erstmals Kulturbedingungen etablieren, die die Langzeitkultur ohne die Verwendung von Zytokinen ermöglicht. Mittels dieser Kokultur konnte ich ein Knochenmarknischen-Modell etablieren und die Untersuchung der Expression von zentralen Signalkaskaden der Homöostase dieser Nische untersuchen. Ich konnte die Expression von zwei verschiedenen Isoformen von Osteopontin nachweisen, die in Tiermodellen nicht gefunden werden. Diese Isoformen des Osteopontins habe ich kloniert und die rekombinanten Isoformen exprimiert und ihre Rollen in der Homöostase der Knochenmarknische untersucht.

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) often remains refractory to current chemotherapy and transplantation approaches despite many advances in our understanding of mechanisms in leukemogenesis. The bone marrow “niche” or microenvironment, however, may be permissive to leukemia development and studying interactions between the microenvironment and leukemia cells may provide new insight for therapeutic advances. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are central to the development and maintenance of the bone marrow niche and have been shown to have important functional alterations derived from patients with different hematological disorders. The extent to which MSCs derived from AML patients are altered remains unclear. The aim of this study was to detect changes occurring in MSCs obtained from human bone marrow in patients with AML by comparing their function and gene expression pattern with normal age-matched controls. MSCs expanded from patients diagnosed with acute leukemia were observed to have heterogeneous morphological characteristics compared to the healthy controls. Immunohistochemistry and flow data confirmed the typical cell surface immunophenotype of CD90+ CD105+ CD73+ CD34- CD45-, although MSCs from two patients with AML revealed reduced surface expression of CD105 and CD90 antigens respectively. Differentiation assays demonstrated the potential of MSCs from AML patients and healthy donors to differentiate into bone, fat and cartilage. However, the ability of MSCs from AML samples to support hematopoietic function of CD34+ progenitors was found to be impaired while the key hematopoietic genes were found to be differentially expressed on AML-MSCs compared to nMSCs. These studies indicate that there exist differences in the biologic profile of MSCs from AML patients compared to MSCs derived from healthy donors. The results described in the thesis provide a formulation for additional studies that may allow us to identify new targets for improved treatment of AML.

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) often remains refractory to current chemotherapy and transplantation approaches despite many advances in our understanding of mechanisms in leukemogenesis. The bone marrow “niche” or microenvironment, however, may be permissive to leukemia development and studying interactions between the microenvironment and leukemia cells may provide new insight for therapeutic advances. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are central to the development and maintenance of the bone marrow niche and have been shown to have important functional alterations derived from patients with different hematological disorders. The extent to which MSCs derived from AML patients are altered remains unclear. The aim of this study was to detect changes occurring in MSCs obtained from human bone marrow in patients with AML by comparing their function and gene expression pattern with normal age-matched controls. MSCs expanded from patients diagnosed with acute leukemia were observed to have heterogeneous morphological characteristics compared to the healthy controls. Immunohistochemistry and flow data confirmed the typical cell surface immunophenotype of CD90+ CD105+ CD73+ CD34- CD45-, although MSCs from two patients with AML revealed reduced surface expression of CD105 and CD90 antigens respectively. Differentiation assays demonstrated the potential of MSCs from AML patients and healthy donors to differentiate into bone, fat and cartilage. However, the ability of MSCs from AML samples to support hematopoietic function of CD34+ progenitors was found to be impaired while the key hematopoietic genes were found to be differentially expressed on AML-MSCs compared to nMSCs. These studies indicate that there exist differences in the biologic profile of MSCs from AML patients compared to MSCs derived from healthy donors. The results described in the thesis provide a formulation for additional studies that may allow us to identify new targets for improved treatment of AML.

No description available.

京都大学 / 新制・論文博士 / 博士(医科学) / 乙第13588号 / 論医科博第11号 / 新制||医科||10(附属図書館) / 京都大学大学院医学研究科医科学専攻 / (主査)教授 濵﨑 洋子, 教授 河本 宏, 教授 金子 新 / 学位規則第4条第2項該当 / Doctor of Medical Science / Kyoto University / DFAM

As células-tronco mesenquimais (MSCs) da medula óssea compreendem uma população de células multipotentes com propriedades imunorreguladoras e capacidade de secreção de fatores de crescimento, desempenhando um papel fundamental na regulação da hematopoiese. À luz dessas propriedades, alguns estudos fornecem uma análise das relações estabelecidas entre células-tronco hematopoiéticas normais (HSCs) e MSCs quando expostas à cocultura. Jing et al. (Haematologica, 2010) demonstram neste tipo de arranjos de cocultura a geração de três populações distintas de células: células não aderentes (Fração A), células aderidas à superfície de MSCs (Fração B) e células abaixo das MSCs (Fração C). Além disso, dados recentes apontam para a associação da progressão da doença com a evidência de transferência de mitocôndrias funcionais (mt) e espécies reativas de oxigênio (ROS) das MSCs para as células leucêmicas. É teorizado como um mecanismo de MSCs, a fim de reduzir as espécies reativas de oxigênio (ROS). No entanto, os desempenhos diferenciais nesses processos de transferência entre MSCs normais e leucêmicas em sistemas de cocultura em cada uma dessas populações de células distintas não foram estabelecidos. As células leucêmicas (CD45+) têm um aumento de quase três vezes na proliferação em todas as três populações após a cocultura com MSCs leucêmicas, mas não após a cocultura com MSCs saudáveis. As células CD45+ da fração A têm uma baixa taxa de proliferação em cocultura com MSCs normais comparadas com as células leucêmicas. Em 5d, as MSCs leucêmicas (CD73+) aumentam 20 vezes a coloração de mitotracker em comparação com 3d, implicando que os blastos AML estimulam MSCs a produzir mais mt, embora os MSCs normais apresentem os mesmos níveis de mitotracker em 3 / 5d. Além disso, os níveis de mtROS diminuem em 10 vezes em 5d em comparação com 3d em leucemia, mas não em MSCs normais, sugerindo uma recuperação mediada por mt em MSCs leucêmicas após a cocultura. Finalmente, o ROS total diminui 2 vezes nas células CD45+ após cocultura com MSCs leucêmicas por 5d, mas não em contrapartida normal. Em essência, esses achados sugerem diferentes mecanismos de doação mitocondrial de MSCs para blastos LMA. Além disso, o estudo fornece um passo importante nacompreensão da natureza complexa do metabolismo do tumor, não apenas na célula maligna, mas também dentro do microambiente que a suporta. / Bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) comprise a population of multipotent cells with immunoregulatory properties and the capability of secreting growth factors, playing a key role in the regulation of hematopoiesis. In light of these properties, some studies provide analysis of the relations established between normal hematopoietic stem-cells (HSCs) and MSCs when exposed to coculture. Jing et al. (Haematologica, 2010) demonstrate in these kind of coculture arrangements the generation of three distinct cells populations: non-adherent cells (supernatant), phasebright cells (adhered to the surface of MSCs) and phase-dim cells (beneath the MSCs). Furthermore, recent data pointed to the association of disease progression in AML with the evidence of functional mitochondria (mt), and reactive oxygen species (ROS) transference from MSCs to the blasts cells. It is theorized as a mechanism of MSCs in order to reduce the reactive oxygen species (ROS). Nevertheless, the differential performances in these transference process among normal and leukemic-MSCs in coculture systems in each of those distinct cells populations were not established. AML cells (CD45+) have an increase of almost 2.5-fold in proliferation in all of 03 populations after coculture with leukemic-MSCs but not after coculture with a normalMSCs. The CD45+ cells in phase-bright/dim have a low proliferation rate in coculture with normal-MSCs compared with the leukemic cells. In 5d, the leukemic-MSCs (CD73+) increase 20-fold the mitotracker staining compared with 3d, implying that AML blasts stimulate MSCs to produce more mt, albeit the normal-MSCs present the same mitotracker levels in 3/5d. Additionally, the mtROS levels decrease by 10-fold in 5d compared with 3d in leukemic, but not in normal-MSCs, suggesting mt mediated recover in leukemic-MSCs after coculture. Finally, total ROS decrease 2-fold in CD45+ cells after coculture with leukemic-MSCs for 5d, but not in normal counterpart. In essence, these findings suggest different mechanisms of mitochondrial donation from MSCs to AML blats. Moreover, the study provides an important step in the understanding of the complex nature of tumor metabolism, not only in the malignant cell, but also within the microenvironment which supports it.

As graft source for lymphoma or leukemia treatment, hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) have been the focus of translational medicine for decades. HSPCs are defined by their self-renewing capacity and their ability to give rise to all mature blood cells. They are found anchored to a specialized microenvironment in the bone marrow (BM) called the hematopoietic niche. HSPCs can be enriched by sorting them based on the presence of the surface antigen CD34 before clinical or tissue engineering use. As these cells represent a minority in most graft sources and the amount of applicable cells is limited, ex vivo expansion-cultures were established using cytokine cocktails or small molecules. However, in vitro culture of HSPCs as suspension-cultures result in heterogeneous cell populations with undefined cellular identities. In the BM niche, HSPCs are not exclusively maintained by cytokines but also by cell-matrix adhesions mediated by integrins (ITGs). Thus, β1 and β2 ITGs were found to promote initial contact of HSPCs with mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) and ITGβ3 expression was shown to be a marker for long-term repopulating HSPCs in vivo. Consequently, ex vivo remodeling of the BM niche using co-cultures of HSPCs and niche cells like MSCs came into spotlight and was proven to be a promising tool for stem cell expansion. However, in clinical and research applications, direct contact of two cell populations necessitates HSPC post-culture purification. To address these problems, we established a novel culture method for remodeling the BM extra cellular stroma in vitro wherein we used decellularized extracellular matrix (ECM) scaffolds derived from immortalized mesenchymal stromal cells (SCP-1). Such scaffolds were found to be highly reproducible and served as in vitro niche for HSPCs by being more effective for the expansion of CD34+ cells, compared to classical suspension cultures. ECMs were shown to consist of multiple proteins including fibronectins, collagens, and a major niche chemokine responsible for BM homing and retention of HSPCs in vivo, namely, stromal derived factor 1 (SDF-1). SDF-1 is known to be secreted by MSCs and is anchored to matrix proteins. This reveals that ECM scaffolds produced by SCP-1 cells are a naïve reconstructed microenvironment. When CD34+ cells were seeded, only around 20% of the cells adhered to the provided ECM scaffold. These cells recognized SDF-1 via C-X-C chemokine receptor type 4 (CXCR-4), as shown by laser scanning confocal microscopy. Thus, adhesive sides as they are present in the BM niche are provided. However, CD34+ cells isolated from G-CSF mobilized peripheral blood of healthy donors were found to be heterogenous with respect to adhesion capacity. Nonetheless, it was similar to HSPC co-cultures with SCP-1 cells as feeder layer. Therefore, we separated and analyzed two cell fractions, the adherent (AT-cells) and the non- adherent supernatant (SN-cells) cells. Other signals provided by the BM extracellular stroma to HSPCs are physical cues that control HSPC fate. HSPCs sense these physical features through focal contacts and accordingly remodel their morphological and biomechanical properties. Using real-time deformability cytometry (RT-DC) to uncover biomechanical phenotypes of freshly isolated HSPCs, SN-cells, AT-cells, and classical suspension cultured HSPCs in plastic culture dishes (PCD) were analyzed. We found freshly isolated cells to be less deformable and small. AT-cells displayed actin polymerization to stress fibers, and exhibited a stiffer mechanical phenotype compared to PCD-cultured or SN-cells. This might constitute the first hint of functional adaptation. Integrins are known to establish mechanosensing focal contacts. Thus, we analyzed ITG surface expression and identified ITGαIIb, ITGαV, and ITGβ3 to be enriched on AT-cells compared to freshly isolated cells or SN-cells. Active integrins need to form heterodimers consisting of one α- and one β subunit. Interestingly, the identified ITGs exclusively interact with each other to form RGD peptide receptors. RGD is a tripeptide consisting of the amino acids arginine, glycine, and aspartic acid and was identified as an adhesion sequence within fibronectin and other extracellular proteins. Consequently, we could confirm an important role for ITGαVβ3 in HSPC- ECM interaction with respect to adhesion and migration. However, we also identified ITGβ3 expression on a subset of CD34+ cells either freshly isolated or ECM cultured cells, as a marker for erythrocyte differentiation. These findings demonstrate that, in vitro, the ECM compartment acts as a regulator of HSPC fate and portray mechanical recognition as a potent driver of differentiation. In this context, targeted modulation of ECM scaffolds could enhance cell-ECM interactions and accelerate stem cell expansion or differentiation. These modulations could also provide further insights into HSPC-niche regulation. We demonstrate that ECMs derived from osteogenic differentiated SCP-1 cells increase HSPC expansion but do not lead to increased cell adhesion. As ECM adhesion preliminary alters HSPC function, we aimed at developing ECM scaffolds with increased adhesion capacity. Using lentiviral transduction, we generated a stable knock down of fibulin-1 in SCP-1 cells. Fibulin-1 is an ECM protein known to form anti-adhesion sites with fibronectin. However, we failed to increase adherent cell numbers or enhance HSPC expansion in the fibulin-1 knock down ECMs. Taken together, SCP-1 cell-derived ECM protein scaffolds provide an in vitro niche for HSPCs capable of stem cell expansion. Integrin mediated signaling altered the biomechanical and functional properties of HSPCs and hints at suspension cultures as being inappropriate to study the physiological aspects of HSPCs. Targeted modulation of ECM scaffolds could theoretically generate suitable ex vivo environments with the capacity to gain detailed insight into HSPC regulation within their niche. This will enhance the functionality of new biomaterials and will lead to improved regenerative therapies like BM transplantation.

As graft source for lymphoma or leukemia treatment, hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) have been the focus of translational medicine for decades. HSPCs are defined by their self-renewing capacity and their ability to give rise to all mature blood cells. They are found anchored to a specialized microenvironment in the bone marrow (BM) called the hematopoietic niche. HSPCs can be enriched by sorting them based on the presence of the surface antigen CD34 before clinical or tissue engineering use. As these cells represent a minority in most graft sources and the amount of applicable cells is limited, ex vivo expansion-cultures were established using cytokine cocktails or small molecules. However, in vitro culture of HSPCs as suspension-cultures result in heterogeneous cell populations with undefined cellular identities. In the BM niche, HSPCs are not exclusively maintained by cytokines but also by cell-matrix adhesions mediated by integrins (ITGs). Thus, β1 and β2 ITGs were found to promote initial contact of HSPCs with mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) and ITGβ3 expression was shown to be a marker for long-term repopulating HSPCs in vivo. Consequently, ex vivo remodeling of the BM niche using co-cultures of HSPCs and niche cells like MSCs came into spotlight and was proven to be a promising tool for stem cell expansion. However, in clinical and research applications, direct contact of two cell populations necessitates HSPC post-culture purification. To address these problems, we established a novel culture method for remodeling the BM extra cellular stroma in vitro wherein we used decellularized extracellular matrix (ECM) scaffolds derived from immortalized mesenchymal stromal cells (SCP-1). Such scaffolds were found to be highly reproducible and served as in vitro niche for HSPCs by being more effective for the expansion of CD34+ cells, compared to classical suspension cultures. ECMs were shown to consist of multiple proteins including fibronectins, collagens, and a major niche chemokine responsible for BM homing and retention of HSPCs in vivo, namely, stromal derived factor 1 (SDF-1). SDF-1 is known to be secreted by MSCs and is anchored to matrix proteins. This reveals that ECM scaffolds produced by SCP-1 cells are a naïve reconstructed microenvironment. When CD34+ cells were seeded, only around 20% of the cells adhered to the provided ECM scaffold. These cells recognized SDF-1 via C-X-C chemokine receptor type 4 (CXCR-4), as shown by laser scanning confocal microscopy. Thus, adhesive sides as they are present in the BM niche are provided. However, CD34+ cells isolated from G-CSF mobilized peripheral blood of healthy donors were found to be heterogenous with respect to adhesion capacity. Nonetheless, it was similar to HSPC co-cultures with SCP-1 cells as feeder layer. Therefore, we separated and analyzed two cell fractions, the adherent (AT-cells) and the non- adherent supernatant (SN-cells) cells. Other signals provided by the BM extracellular stroma to HSPCs are physical cues that control HSPC fate. HSPCs sense these physical features through focal contacts and accordingly remodel their morphological and biomechanical properties. Using real-time deformability cytometry (RT-DC) to uncover biomechanical phenotypes of freshly isolated HSPCs, SN-cells, AT-cells, and classical suspension cultured HSPCs in plastic culture dishes (PCD) were analyzed. We found freshly isolated cells to be less deformable and small. AT-cells displayed actin polymerization to stress fibers, and exhibited a stiffer mechanical phenotype compared to PCD-cultured or SN-cells. This might constitute the first hint of functional adaptation. Integrins are known to establish mechanosensing focal contacts. Thus, we analyzed ITG surface expression and identified ITGαIIb, ITGαV, and ITGβ3 to be enriched on AT-cells compared to freshly isolated cells or SN-cells. Active integrins need to form heterodimers consisting of one α- and one β subunit. Interestingly, the identified ITGs exclusively interact with each other to form RGD peptide receptors. RGD is a tripeptide consisting of the amino acids arginine, glycine, and aspartic acid and was identified as an adhesion sequence within fibronectin and other extracellular proteins. Consequently, we could confirm an important role for ITGαVβ3 in HSPC- ECM interaction with respect to adhesion and migration. However, we also identified ITGβ3 expression on a subset of CD34+ cells either freshly isolated or ECM cultured cells, as a marker for erythrocyte differentiation. These findings demonstrate that, in vitro, the ECM compartment acts as a regulator of HSPC fate and portray mechanical recognition as a potent driver of differentiation. In this context, targeted modulation of ECM scaffolds could enhance cell-ECM interactions and accelerate stem cell expansion or differentiation. These modulations could also provide further insights into HSPC-niche regulation. We demonstrate that ECMs derived from osteogenic differentiated SCP-1 cells increase HSPC expansion but do not lead to increased cell adhesion. As ECM adhesion preliminary alters HSPC function, we aimed at developing ECM scaffolds with increased adhesion capacity. Using lentiviral transduction, we generated a stable knock down of fibulin-1 in SCP-1 cells. Fibulin-1 is an ECM protein known to form anti-adhesion sites with fibronectin. However, we failed to increase adherent cell numbers or enhance HSPC expansion in the fibulin-1 knock down ECMs. Taken together, SCP-1 cell-derived ECM protein scaffolds provide an in vitro niche for HSPCs capable of stem cell expansion. Integrin mediated signaling altered the biomechanical and functional properties of HSPCs and hints at suspension cultures as being inappropriate to study the physiological aspects of HSPCs. Targeted modulation of ECM scaffolds could theoretically generate suitable ex vivo environments with the capacity to gain detailed insight into HSPC regulation within their niche. This will enhance the functionality of new biomaterials and will lead to improved regenerative therapies like BM transplantation.:List of contents I List of figures IV List of tables VI Abbreviations VII 1 Introduction 1 1.1 The stem cell microenvironment 3 1.1.1 The cellular endosteal bone marrow microenvironment 6 1.1.1.1 Mesenchymal stem/stromal cells 7 1.1.1.2 Hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells 8 1.1.2 Extracellular bone marrow microenvironment 10 1.1.2.1 Extracellular matrix 11 Chemokines and Cytokines 12 Cell adhesion to ECM 13 1.2 Native ex vivo ECM scaffolds 16 2 Aim of the study 19 3 Materials and methods 21 3.1 Materials 21 3.1.1 Chemicals and reagents 21 3.1.2 Kits 23 3.1.3 Media 24 3.1.4 Antibodies 24 3.1.5 Primers, sh-RNA sequences, and vectors 25 3.1.6 Equipment 26 3.1.7 Software 27 3.2 Methods 27 3.2.1 Cell preparation and culture 27 3.2.1.1 Mesenchymal stromal cells 27 3.2.1.2 Hematopoietic stem cells 28 3.2.1.3 Single cell picked clone 1 (SCP-1) cells 28 3.2.2 Generation of surface immobilized ECM preparations 29 3.2.2.1 Surface functionalization 29 3.2.2.2 ECM preparation 29 3.2.3 Flow cytometry and fluorescent activated cell sorting 30 3.2.4 Cell cycle analyses 30 3.2.5 Proliferation analyses 31 3.2.6 Colony forming unit cell assay (CFU-GEMM) 31 3.2.7 Migration assays 31 3.2.7.1 Transwell migration 31 3.2.7.2 Live cell migration 32 3.2.8 Confocal laser scanning microscopy 32 3.2.9 Real-time deformability cytometry (RT-DC) 32 3.2.10 Molecular biological methods 33 3.2.10.1 RNA isolation, reverse transcription, and PCR 33 3.2.10.2 Lentiviral shRNA transduction 34 3.2.10.3 Western blot 35 3.2.10.4 ELISA 36 3.2.11 Statistical analysis 37 4 Results 38 4.1 Extracellular matrix scaffolds for HSPCs 38 4.1.1 ECM properties 39 4.1.2 HSPC survival in ECM and PCD cultures 40 4.1.3 HSPC expansion in ECM and PCD cultures 41 4.2 HSPC morphological and mechanical adaptation to ECM 44 4.2.1 Actin polymerization and polarization 45 4.2.2 Biomechanical phenotype 46 4.3 Bioactive SDF-1 is incorporated in ECM scaffolds 49 4.3.1 CXCR4 polarization towards ECM 50 4.4 HSPC integrin expression and migration 52 4.4.1 Integrin surface expression on HSPC subsets 52 4.4.2 Focal contact formation 53 4.4.3 Integrin activation via ECM adhesion 55 4.4.4 Clonogenicity of ECM cultured HSPCs 57 4.4.5 HSPC migration when attached to ECM scaffolds 60 4.4.5.1 Reduced migratory behavior via ITGαVβ3 inhibition 61 4.4.5.2 SDF-1 induces migration but not adhesion 64 4.5 Targeted modulation of ECM scaffolds 65 4.5.1 Fibulin-1 knock down in SCP-1 cells 66 4.5.2 HSPC support of fibulin-1 reduced ECM scaffolds 70 5 Discussion 73 5.1 SCP-1 cells as a source for ECM scaffold production 74 5.2 Cell adhesion and focal contact formation 75 5.3 HSPC multilineage potential 78 5.4 ECM scaffold modulation 79 6 Summary 83 7 Zusammenfassung 86 Bibliography 89 Danksagung 108 Anlagen 110 Erklärung zur Eröffnung des Promotionsverfahrens [Formblatt 1.2.1] 110 Erklärung zur Einhaltung rechtlicher Vorschriften [Formblatt 1.1] 110