published_or_final_version / Anatomy / Doctoral / Doctor of Philosophy

Introduction: The wide-ranging prognostic implications of a breast cancer diagnosis highlight the need to better enable women to make informed decisions regarding screening and treatment options. As several cancer susceptibility syndromes have been linked to germline mutations resulting in defective DNA repair, including the predisposition to breast cancer due to BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations, more subtle defects in DNA repair capacity may contribute to the components driving differential susceptibility within the general population. Hence, understanding the role of DNA repair capacity in breast cancer onset may aid in the development of a more comprehensive risk profile, thereby furthering the effort to target relevant populations for early screening. In the studies undertaken for this dissertation, we employed various methodologies capturing endpoints across different repair pathways detectable in blood to both further elucidate the etiologic basis of breast cancer development and leverage the information into the potential development of a screening biomarker. Methods: For the phenotypic assessment of nucleotide excision repair (NER) capacity, we developed an ELISA-based method to determine benzo(a)pyrene diolepoxide (BPDE)-DNA adduct capacity in lymphoblastoid cell lines. Gene expression levels were assessed with pre-designed Taqman kits in RNA-derived cDNAs from mononuclear cells using a real-time PCR-based platform. Methylation analysis was conducted with in-house designed assays on bisulfite-converted DNA from mononuclear cells using a pyrosequencing platform. Finally, single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) genotyping was assessed in DNA derived from white blood cells with pre-designed Taqman SNP genotyping assays using a real-time PCR-based platform. All studies were conducted in sister-sets enrolled in the New York site within the Breast Cancer Family Registry and all statistical analysis was conducted using the R Foundation for Statistical Computing (2011). Results: We did not detect an association between the ELISA-based phenotypic assessment of NER capacity in the lymphoblastoid cells lines of the sister-sets (n=246, 114 sister-sets) and breast cancer risk (OR = 1.0, 95%CI=0.95, 1.04). Furthermore, we did not observe a correlation with previously determined NER capacity in the same population using an immunohistochemical-based method (r= -0.01, p=0.86). In our gene expression study (n=569, 218 sister-sets), women in the lowest tertile of ATM expression had a heightened risk of breast cancer compared to women in the highest tertile of expression, adjusted for age at blood draw and smoking status (OR=2.12, 95%CI=1.09, 4.12). This association was largely restricted to women with an extended family history of breast cancer (pinteraction = 0.06). Additionally, women in the lowest tertile of MSH2 expression also had a heightened risk of breast cancer compared to women in the highest tertile of expression, adjusted for age at blood draw and smoking status (OR=2.75, 95%CI=1.31, 5.79). The association observed between reductions in ATM expression level and breast cancer risk was lost upon incorporating previously determined end-joining capacity of EcoRI-generated sticky end substrates (OR=1.28, 95%CI=0.15, 11.2) and HincII-generated blunt end substrates (OR=1.55, 95%CI=0.15, 15.5) into the model, suggesting that the impact on risk due to reductions in ATM expression maybe partially driven by the reduction in double strand break repair capacity. In our study investigating breast cancer risk due to the impact of epigenetic modulation on DNA repair gene activity (n=569, 218 sister-sets), no association with risk was observed due to differential promoter methylation levels of BRCA1 (OR=1.09, 95%CI=0.98, 1.20), MLH1 (OR=1.19, 95%CI=0.91, 1.55) or MSH2 (OR=0.89, 95%CI=0.48, 1.64). Furthermore, no correlation between BRCA1 and expression (r=-0.05, p=0.39) or MSH2 methylation and expression (r=-0.04, p=0.39) was observed. Finally, our mismatch repair genotyping study (n=714, 313 sister-sets) indicated an association between the variant MutY_rs3219489 (OR=2.23, 95%CI=1.10, 4.52) and breast cancer risk, as well as a borderline association with risk due to the variant MSH2_rs2303428 (OR=1.71, 95%CI=0.99, 2.95). Furthermore, a protective effect was observed due to the variant MLH3_rs175080, restricted to women without an extended family history of breast cancer (pinteraction = 0.03). Conclusion: These studies suggest that the deregulation of targets spanning various DNA repair pathways contribute to the risk of familial breast cancer.

The pituitary hormone prolactin (Prl) is essential for alveolar morphogenesis and plays a role in breast carcinogenesis, however the mechanism that underlies these actions remains to be defined. Alterations in serum Prl provide the primary endocrine signal regulating developmental events in the mammary gland in sexually mature mammals. Prl production and post-translational phosphorylation by the pituitary is regulated by the neuropeptide Galanin (Gal) in response to hypothalamic signals integrating neuronal and endocrine inputs. Prl exerts its effects on the mammary epithelium in two ways, indirectly by modulation of the systemic hormonal environment, for example the release of progesterone from the corpus luteum, and directly by binding to Prl receptors (Prlr) within the mammary epithelium. Prl binding to Prlr initiates signalling predominantly via activation of the Jak2/Stat5 pathway, leading to altered patterns of gene transcription. One of these target genes is the ets transcription factor Elf5, which is required by the epithelium for alveolar morphogenesis. This thesis aims to further our understanding of the mechanisms by which prolactin exerts its influence on the mammary gland during alveolar morphogenesis and carcinogenesis. Transcript profiling revealed a lactation signature of 35 genes in Prlr+/- mice, Gal-/- mice and mice treated with a Prl mutant (S179D) that mimics phosphorylated Prl. We discovered that the majority of changes in gene expression were produced by prolactin rather than by Gal. The action of Gal was predominantly via modulation of Prl phosphorylation and release, as its effects were very similar to that of S179D. Knockout of Elf5 phenocopied knockout of Prlr, resulting in failure of alveolar morphogenesis and reduced expression of milk and lipid synthesis genes. Forced Elf5 expression at puberty resulted in aberrant differentiation of the terminal end buds and milk protein synthesis during ductal morphogenesis. Re-expression of Elf5 in Prlr-/- mammary epithelial cells completely rescued alveolar morphogenesis. These observations indicate that Elf5 is a master regulator of alveolar morphogenesis downstream of the Prlr. Loss of mammary epithelial Prlr resulted in reduced proliferation of low-grade neoplastic lesions resulting in increased tumour latency in the C3(1)/SV40T model of mammary carcinogenesis. There was no change in the growth rate, proliferation nor the morphology of tumours in Prlr-/-/C3(1)/SV40T transplants, thus Prl acts early in carcinogenesis to drive the proliferation of pre-invasive lesions resulting in faster progression to cancer.

Yau, Ka Long. / Thesis (M.Phil.)--Chinese University of Hong Kong, 2013. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 97-113). / Electronic reproduction. Hong Kong : Chinese University of Hong Kong, [2012] System requirements: Adobe Acrobat Reader. Available via World Wide Web. / Abstracts also in Chinese.

As a master regulator of the epithelial state, p63 is a family member of the well-known tumor suppressor p53. It has previously been connected to a cancer-associated process, epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT), and here we find that it can be regulated by oncogenes involved in breast tumorigenesis. Specifically, activated forms of PIK3CA and H-RAS are able to strongly repress expression of ∆Np63α, which is the major p63 isoform in epithelial cells. In mammary epithelial lines, this oncogene downregulation occurs at the transcriptional level, and complete repression occurs over the course of several days. As p63 is repressed, the cells undergo EMT and acquire the ability to invade individually through a 3D collagen matrix. Strikingly, even when p63 is suppressed but no oncogene action is present, these cells undergo a mesenchymal shift, suggesting the importance of this gene in maintaining the epithelial state. Furthermore, it is particularly interesting that p63 protein and RNA levels are often low in breast tumors. By connecting H-RAS and PIK3CA signaling to p63, it is hypothesized that such oncogene suppression could account for tumor progression in cases where p63 levels are low. Here, it is proposed that p63 acts in a tumor-suppressive manner, although it can be overcome by oncogenes leading to changes in differentiation state and migratory capability, therefore drastically affecting breast carcinogenesis.

Metastasis is the primary cause of mortality in women with breast cancer. Recently, elevated serum levels of a glycoprotein known as chitinase-3 likeprotein- 1 (CHI3L1) has been correlated with poor prognosis and shorter survival of patients with cancer and inflammatory diseases. The biological and physiological functions of CHI3L1 in tumor progression have not yet been elucidated. In this document, we describe the role of CHI3L1 in tumor growth and metastasis and its relationship with inflammation. Using well-established models of breast cancer, we show that CHI3L1 is increased in the serum of tumor bearing mice. We found that CHI3L1 levels are increased at both the “pre-metastatic” and “metastatic stage” and that tumor cells, splenic, alveolar and interstitial macrophages; and myeloid derived population produce CHI3L1. Furthermore, we demonstrated that CHI3L1 has an inhibitory role on the expression of interferon-gamma (IFN γ) by T cells, while enhancing the production of pro-inflammatory mediators by macrophages such as Cchemokine ligand 2 (CCL2/MCP-1), Chemokine CX motif ligand 2 (CXCL2/IL-8) and matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9), all of which promote tumor growth and metastasis. We demonstrated that in vivo treatment of tumor-bearing mice with chitin microparticles, a TH1 adjuvant and a substrate for CHI3L1, promoted immune effector functions with increased production of IFN-γ but decreased CCL2/MCP-1, CXCL2/IL-8 and MMP-9 expression by splenic and pulmonary macrophages. Significantly, in vivo administration of chitin microparticles decreased tumor growth and pulmonary metastasis in mammary tumor bearing mice. These results suggest that CHI3L1 may play a role in tumor progression. Inflammation plays a pivotal role during tumor progression and metastasis by promoting the production of pro-inflammatory molecules such as CHI3L1. However, little is known about how CHI3L1 expression can affect secondary sites to enhance metastasis. In these studies, we demonstrated that CHI3L1 alters the cellular composition and inflammatory mediators that aid in the establishment of a metastatic niche for the support of infiltrating tumor cells leading to accelerated tumor progression. Since previous studies showed that CHI3L1 modulates inflammation, we determined the role of CHI3L1 in the context of pre-existing inflammation and metastasis. We found that CHI3L1 deficient mice with preexisting inflammation had decreased pro-inflammatory mediators, and significant reduction in tumor volume and metastasis compared to wild type controls. Preexisting inflammation and CHI3L1 may be driving the establishment of a premetastatic milieu in the lungs and aiding in the establishment of metastasis. Understanding the role of CHI3L1 in inflammation during tumor progression could result in the design of targeted therapies for breast cancer patients. / Includes bibliography. / Dissertation (Ph.D.)--Florida Atlantic University, 2015. / FAU Electronic Theses and Dissertations Collection

Bibliography: v. 2, leaves [410]-464 / 2 v. : ill ; 30 cm. / Title page, contents and abstract only. The complete thesis in print form is available from the University Library. / Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Adelaide, Dept. of Community Medicine, 1986?