11 |
Planung von CIM-Projekten : Integration der Auftragsabwicklung in der Einzel- und Kleinserienfertigung /Walti, Adrian. January 1993 (has links)
St. Gallen, Hochsch., Diss., 1993. / St. Gallen, Hochsch. für Wirtschafts-, Rechts- und Sozialwiss., Diss.
|
12 |
Methode zum Nachweis der Wirtschaftlichkeit von Investitionen in die rechnerintegrierte Produktion /Burger, Astrid. January 1997 (has links)
Zugl.: Paderborn, Universiẗat, Diss., 1997.
|
13 |
Integriertes Netzwerk zur Fertigungssteuerung und -automatisierung /Gehnen, Gerrit. January 1999 (has links)
Zugl.: Paderborn, Universiẗat, Diss., 1999.
|
14 |
Performance of computer communications for manufacturingTilley, Kevin Joseph January 1991 (has links)
No description available.
|
15 |
Implementation of computer integrated manufacturing in small and medium enterprisesMarri, Hussain Bux January 2000 (has links)
No description available.
|
16 |
Computer Integrated Business theoretische und empirische Analyse der bisherigen Ansätze und zukünfigen Perspektiven /Fochler, Klaus. Unknown Date (has links)
Universiẗat, Diss., 2006--Kassel.
|
17 |
Integrated management system for multi-purpose batch chemical plantsChua, Eng Sway January 1995 (has links)
No description available.
|
18 |
Enterprise Modelling supported by Manufacturing Systems TheoryMyklebust, Odd January 2002 (has links)
<p>There exist today a large number of enterprise models or enterprise modelling approaches. In a study of standards and project developed models there are two approaches: CIMOSA “The Open Systems Architecture for CIM” and GERAM, “Generalised Enterprise Reference Architecture”, which show a system orientation that can be further followed as interesting research topics for a system theory oriented approach for enterprise models.</p><p>In the selection of system theories, manufacturing system theory is interesting and promising to adapt or extend to further synthesising and usage of enterprise models.</p><p>Today the design and creation of an enterprise model are based on a given architecture and available even though this is not always practical. When it comes to execution and operational phases of the model, the possibilities are more limited.</p><p><b>Manufacturing system theory</b> [Bjørke 1995] was developed to describe system-oriented approaches to manufacturing systems including product configuration and design processes. This includes a large number of disciplines like mechanics, cybernetics, material science etc. on the physical side and planning activities, economical aspects and optimisation processes on the human side. The theory is based on geometry as the foundation and the methods within the theory are related to concepts of connections. The analysis of the manufacturing systems is the prime area for the usage of this theory and is important in order to bring a science base into manufacturing. But the theory can be used in a more generic way.</p><p><b>The theory of logic</b> [Møller 1995] relates also to the concept of connections, being expressed as logic arguments. The theory is generic and has been applied to different model approaches e.g. product configuration, scheduling and planning, railway logic control. This theory of logic is also fully applicable in manufacturing system theory. The theory of logic and the manufacturing systems theory are both based on geometry or more precisely expressed the geometric funded theory of connections.</p><p>The main requirement for the enterprise model architecture to be used together with the theory of logic is that it can be divided into a 3D orthogonal space with unique defined axis. In this work a 3D space based upon product, process and organisational axis is preferred, also called the PPO-model. In this study combination of the enterprise modelling architecture, GERAM ISO 15704, and the theory of logic are used to show how systems theory can be used in control and management of operational phases of enterprise models. The usage of logic theory within enterprise modelling gives solutions on management and control issues in an operational phase of the product model. If is important to emphasis that this is not an approach for populating or transfer of operative data into a model. The integration of theses theories are illustrated through examples that show modelled entities of an enterprise in operation within areas of:</p><p> - Execution of operative manufacturing unit</p><p> - Organisational and strategic issues</p><p> - Enterprise planning with aspects of uncertainty</p><p>An own PPO model for feature based integration within product design and process planning has been developed to show that alternative more simple and detailed architectures also can be used.</p>
|
19 |
Enterprise Modelling supported by Manufacturing Systems TheoryMyklebust, Odd January 2002 (has links)
There exist today a large number of enterprise models or enterprise modelling approaches. In a study of standards and project developed models there are two approaches: CIMOSA “The Open Systems Architecture for CIM” and GERAM, “Generalised Enterprise Reference Architecture”, which show a system orientation that can be further followed as interesting research topics for a system theory oriented approach for enterprise models. In the selection of system theories, manufacturing system theory is interesting and promising to adapt or extend to further synthesising and usage of enterprise models. Today the design and creation of an enterprise model are based on a given architecture and available even though this is not always practical. When it comes to execution and operational phases of the model, the possibilities are more limited. <b>Manufacturing system theory</b> [Bjørke 1995] was developed to describe system-oriented approaches to manufacturing systems including product configuration and design processes. This includes a large number of disciplines like mechanics, cybernetics, material science etc. on the physical side and planning activities, economical aspects and optimisation processes on the human side. The theory is based on geometry as the foundation and the methods within the theory are related to concepts of connections. The analysis of the manufacturing systems is the prime area for the usage of this theory and is important in order to bring a science base into manufacturing. But the theory can be used in a more generic way. <b>The theory of logic</b> [Møller 1995] relates also to the concept of connections, being expressed as logic arguments. The theory is generic and has been applied to different model approaches e.g. product configuration, scheduling and planning, railway logic control. This theory of logic is also fully applicable in manufacturing system theory. The theory of logic and the manufacturing systems theory are both based on geometry or more precisely expressed the geometric funded theory of connections. The main requirement for the enterprise model architecture to be used together with the theory of logic is that it can be divided into a 3D orthogonal space with unique defined axis. In this work a 3D space based upon product, process and organisational axis is preferred, also called the PPO-model. In this study combination of the enterprise modelling architecture, GERAM ISO 15704, and the theory of logic are used to show how systems theory can be used in control and management of operational phases of enterprise models. The usage of logic theory within enterprise modelling gives solutions on management and control issues in an operational phase of the product model. If is important to emphasis that this is not an approach for populating or transfer of operative data into a model. The integration of theses theories are illustrated through examples that show modelled entities of an enterprise in operation within areas of: - Execution of operative manufacturing unit - Organisational and strategic issues - Enterprise planning with aspects of uncertainty An own PPO model for feature based integration within product design and process planning has been developed to show that alternative more simple and detailed architectures also can be used.
|
20 |
A study of CIM implementation and Adaptation of Organization - IC Assembly and testing semi-industryChen, Jimmy 25 January 2003 (has links)
Industries are facing more and more challenges with shorter product life span, shorter cycle time demand from customers, diverse product features, adopting advanced processes, global marketing, time demanding manufacturing and management, uncertainty of forecast, and pressure of price cut, etc. To manage all the aspects, industries are requires to re-engineer their companies to improve competitiveness. Therefore, in recent years. CIM, which emphasize on integrating in-house resources,is getting higher attentions from semiconductor companies.
The main motive to introduce CIM is to reduce manpower, improve product quality, shorten cycle time, lower inventory, increase efficiency, react to fast changing market and enhance production flexibility. Especially on semi-conductor assembly and test sub-contacting business, due to strong request from IDM customers to manage their supply chain, companies are introducing CIM systems to fulfill the customer requirement and enhance competitiveness, meanwhile elevate the entry barrier as well.
How to benefit from CIM are the new challenges to the companies who bring in such system. Thus, this research applies Leonard-Barton¡¦s perspective as the reference
Structure and adopts case study methodology to investigate how the three dimensions
(Technical, delivery system and organizational performance) could be related to the four
Chosen companies of IC Assembly and testing manufacture. The data was collected mainly
Through semi-structured interviews. By doing the above, this research would like to explore the relationship between CIM implementation and organizational adaptation.
The research results indicated that manufacture flow module in these four cases was conducted according to the built-in system flows modeling of the CIM package adopted, then through by the system and flow integration of CIM and ERP
to make the information flow and internal organization more close. The system integrity and the paradigm of built-in flow are the main benefits derived from CIM implementation from the technology perspective. Guided by the built-in flow, the company can adapt itself through learning and obtain potential synergy. However, by so doing, the company is exposed to the risk of system function inadequacy and the deleterious impact brought by BPR, which is conducted without active participation of the user organization. In summary, the potential hazard of technology dimension comes from system function inadequacy and system transplant without conducting proper BPR. This in turn will increase the risk of software project and incur potential costs such as compromise and system tuning.
Lastly, we found three key factors to the successful adaptation between CIM system and organization. 1. Integration between CIM and ERP. 2. Specification and compatibility of CIM and usage of build-in flow modeling tools. 3. Internal flow adaptation including internal change management, coordination among associated information departments, and KU educational trainings. The mentioned three points are keys to minimize the problems of organization adaptation and help to smoothen the manufacturing flow integration and improve the overall performance when CIM system implement in the industries.
|
Page generated in 0.0284 seconds