No description available.

Dendritic cells (DCs) are prime mediators of innate and adaptive immunity. In humans the DC population comprise only 0.1% of all leukocytes, making their isolation and ex vivo manipulation difficult. Since study of DC activity in vitro requires large numbers of DCs to be readily available, a cell line model, KG-1, was selected. KG-1 cells are a cytokine-responsive human CD34+ myelomonocytic cell line and can be induced to differentiate to a DC phenotype. A range of differentiation agents and protocols were compared, and differentiation efficiency was determined using both morphological features and cell surface marker expression. Expression of CD83, CD11c, CD123, CD86, HLA-DR and DC-SIGN was assessed by immunofluorescence and flow cytometry. KG-1 cells stimulated with 10 ng/ml PMA and 100 ng/ml Ionomycin were found to be the ideal model for obtaining Dendritic Like Cells (DLCs) in vitro. The effect of lactic acid bacteria on KG-1 differentiation was also tested using two immunomodulatory strains, Lactobacillus rhamnosus R0011 and Lactobacillus helveticus R0052. After 5 days of incubation with R0011 the KG-1 cells expressed DC-specific surface markers CD83, CD86, CD11c, CD123, DC-SIGN and HLA-DR. Lactobacillus rhamnosus R0011 induced a marked rise in CD83 expression with a mean fluorescence intensity of 115.3 after 5 days, suggesting this strain promoted KG-1 differentiation to DLC. Analysis of cytokine by KG-1 DLC indicated that constitutive production of pro-inflammatory cytokines TNF-α and IL-12 was minimal. However IL-10 and TGF-β were detected after TLR-agonist stimulation of R0011-differentiated KG-1s. This study aimed to develop and assess the KG-1 cell model for screening effects of mediators and microbes on DC. / UOIT

Un être humain adulte produit environ deux millions d’érythrocytes par seconde, à travers un processus connu sous le nom d’érythropoïèse. L’érythropoïèse est contrôlée par une balance entre prolifération et différenciation finement régulée. L’expression des gènes impliqués dans ces deux processus distincts, est régulée extrinsèquement (cytokines) et intrinsèquement (microenvirennement métabolique, facteurs de transcription). Les facteurs de transcription, fonctionnent sous forme de complexes multiprotéiques et contrôlent l’activité transcriptionnelle des cellules. Parmi eux, le complexe LDB1 joue un rôle clé dans la régulation de la balance prolifération/différenciation pendant l’érythropoïèse, puisqu’il contrôle l’expression des gènes impliquées dans ces deux processus. Au cours de mon doctorat, nous avons d’abord caractérisé les mécanismes moléculaires de la “pré-activation” des gènes de différenciation, également nommés marqueurs erythroides, dans les progéniteurs erythroides immatures. La pré-activation, est un état dans lequel, les gènes sont exprimés à un niveau basal très bas, permissif pour une activation significative pendant la différenciation. Nous avons ainsi montré que les répresseurs : ETO2, IRF2BP2 et NCOR1, interagissent avec le complexe LDB1, et lient ensemble les gènes des marqueurs erythroides et les répriment. Au cours de l’érythropoïèse, ces corépresseurs sont déstabilisés et LDB1 agit alors comme un activateur. En ce qui concerne les gènes de prolifération, nous avons observé que le complexe LDB1 est déstabilisé au niveau de ces loci pendant l’érythropoïèse. Afin d’étudier les mécanismes moléculaires de la répression génique des gènes de prolifération au cours de l’érythropoïèse, nous avons choisi d’étudier Myb, une cible du complexe LDB1, étudié auparavant dans le laboratoire. Nous avons testé trois facteurs : ZEB1, OGT et RNF12, en tant que candidats dans la répression de Myb. Nous avons montré que RNF12 est le seul facteur intervenant dans la transcription de Myb. RNF12 régule Myb probablement par une modification de complexes épigénétiques. / Every second about 2 million erythrocytes are produced in the adult human body, through a process called erythropoiesis. Erythropoiesis is controlled by a highly regulated balance between proliferation and differentiation. Expression of genes responsible for cell proliferation and differentiation is controlled external (such as cytokines) and internal (such as metabolic microenvironment and transcription factors). Transcription factors bind DNA and recruit co-factors generating transcriptional complexes. The LDB1 complex has a key role in the balance between erythroid proliferation vs. differentiation, since it regulates genes involved in both processes. During my Ph.D., we investigated the molecular mechanisms that LDB1 employs to regulate genes with divergent function. We first showed that in erythroid progenitors, differentiating genes, also known as erythroid markers, are primed. Gene priming consists of genes expressed in low basal but significant levels in progenitors, which can rapidly be activated during differentiation. We showed that in progenitors, ETO2, IRF2BP2 and NCOR1, bind the LDB1 complex therefore generating a priming complex. During differentiation, binding of the repressive (ETO2-IRF2BP2-NCOR1) co-factors to the LDB1 complex, is destabilized and genes become active. In genes involved in erythroid proliferation, we observed that LDB1 is destabilized, a feature leading to gene silencing. We used Myb, as a model of gene silencing in the context of regulation by the LDB1 complex. We tested three transcription factors: ZEB1, OGT and RNF12, as candidates in gene silencing. Among these factors, only RNF12 regulates Myb expression, probably through modifications of epigenetic silencers (Polycomb/MLL).

Human pluripotent stem cells (hPSCs) exist in multiple states of pluripotency, broadly categorised as naïve and primed states. These provide an important model to investigate the earliest stages of human embryonic development. Naïve cells can be obtained through primed-to-naïve reprogramming; however, there are no reliable methods to prospectively isolate unmodified naïve cells during this process. Moreover, the current isolation strategies are incompatible for enrichment of naïve hPSCs early during reprogramming. Consequently, we know very little about the temporal dynamics of transcriptional changes and remodelling of the epigenetic landscape that occurs during the reprogramming process. To address this knowledge gap, I sought to develop an isolation strategy capable of identifying nascent naïve hPSCs early during reprogramming. Comprehensive profiling of cell-surface markers by flow cytometry in naïve and primed hPSCs revealed pluripotent state-specific antibodies. By compiling the identified state-specific markers into a multiplexed antibody panel, I was able to distinguish naïve and primed hPSCs. Moreover, the antibody panel was able to track the dynamics of primed-to-naïve reprogramming, as the state-specific surface markers collectively reflect the change in pluripotent states. Through using the newly identified surface markers, I found that naïve cells are formed at a much earlier time point than previously realised, and could be subsequently isolated from a heterogeneous cell population early during reprogramming. This allowed me to perform the first molecular characterisation of nascent naïve hPSCs, which revealed distinct transcriptional changes associated with early and late stage naïve cell formation. Analysis of the DNA methylation landscape showed that nascent naïve cells are globally hypomethylated, whilst imprint methylation is largely preserved. Moreover, the loss of DNA methylation precedes X-chromosome reactivation, which occurs primarily during the late-stage of primed-to-naïve reprogramming, and is therefore a hallmark of mature naïve cells. Using the antibody panel at discrete time points throughout reprogramming has allowed an unprecedented insight into the early molecular events leading to naïve cell formation, and permits the direct comparison between different naïve reprogramming methods. Taken together, the identified state-specific surface markers provide a robust and straightforward method to unambiguously define human PSC states, and reveal for the first time the order of transcriptional and epigenetic changes associated with primed to naïve reprogramming.