The reaction of the lithium tris(2-pyridyl)stannate [LiSn(2-py6OtBu)3] (py6OtBu = C5H3N-6-OtBu),1, with the element(II) amides E{N(SiMe3)2}2 (E = Sn, Pb) afforded complexes [LiE{Sn(2 py6OtBu)3}3] for E = Sn (2) and E = Pb (3), which reveal three Sn–E bonds each. Compounds 2 and 3 have been characterized by solution NMR spectroscopy and X-ray crystallographic studies. Large 1J(119Sn–119/117Sn) as well as 1J(207Pb–119/117Sn) coupling constants confirm their structural integrity in solution. However, contrary to 2, complex 3 slowly disintegrates in solution to give elemental lead and the hexaheteroarylditin [Sn(2-py6OtBu)3]2 (4).

The reaction of the lithium tris(2-pyridyl)stannate [LiSn(2-py6OtBu)3] (py6OtBu = C5H3N-6-OtBu),1, with the element(II) amides E{N(SiMe3)2}2 (E = Sn, Pb) afforded complexes [LiE{Sn(2 py6OtBu)3}3] for E = Sn (2) and E = Pb (3), which reveal three Sn–E bonds each. Compounds 2 and 3 have been characterized by solution NMR spectroscopy and X-ray crystallographic studies. Large 1J(119Sn–119/117Sn) as well as 1J(207Pb–119/117Sn) coupling constants confirm their structural integrity in solution. However, contrary to 2, complex 3 slowly disintegrates in solution to give elemental lead and the hexaheteroarylditin [Sn(2-py6OtBu)3]2 (4).

Die Hautsensibilisierung (Typ 4 Hautallergie) nimmt in der Toxizitätsbewertung einen wichtigen Stellenwert ein, was u.a. daran zu sehen ist, dass sie unter dem europäischen Chemikaliengesetz REACH schon sehr früh, d.h. ab einer Jahrestonne, abgeprüft werden soll. Die Dissertation untersucht, ob die derzeit im Tierversuch stattfindende Toxizitätsprüfung durch computerchemische Methoden ersetzt werden kann. Dazu wurde eine Datenbank aus über 2000 Stoffen erstellt, aus der wichtige Unterschiede zwischen den eingesetzten Tiermodellen herausgelesen werden konnten. In den Untersuchungen trat auch zu Tage, dass – entgegen vorheriger Annahmen – die Bioverfügbarkeit, d.h. die Aufnahme von Substanzen über die Haut, im Tierversuch nur eine untergeordnete Rolle spielt. Zudem ist eine Abschätzung des hautsensibilisierenden Effekts von Stoffen anhand eines Read-across (Interpolation aus strukturähnlichen Verbindungen) und von Strukturalarmen (Substruktur­elemente als Indikatoren für einen bestimmten Effekt) möglich. Wenn beide Ansätze im Rahmen einer Konsens­modellierung miteinander verschränkt werden, ergibt sich sogar eine gute Vorhersagestatistik. / Skin sensitisation (type 4 skin allergy) is an important parameter in the toxicity assessment of chemicals, which is underlined by the fact that it is evaluated even at the lowest tonnage (1 t/a), which can be registered under the european chemicals regulation (REACH). In this thesis it was investigated if the currently used animal models can be replace or refined with computational (in silico toxicological) methods. In this regard a data base consisting of about 2000 substances was build. With its data important differences between the currently applied animal tests could be derived. Furthermore, the investigation found that – in contrast to previous assumptions – the bioavailability of a chemical compound, i.e. the uptake via the skin, has only a minor impact on the test result of the evaluated animal models. Moreover, it was demonstated that the skin sensitising potential of chemicals can be predicted by read-across (interpolation with structurally similar substances) and with structural alerts (substructural elements which indicate a particular effect). Combining both prediction methods with consensus modelling lead to a good prediction regarding the question whether a particular chemical compound is a sensitiser or not.