Spelling suggestions: "subject:"when rossi.pdf"" "subject:"then rossi.pdf""
1 |
The role of dispersal in population dynamics of breeding Ross's geeseDrake, Kiel L. 27 April 2006
Spatial variation in density of organisms can lead to challenges in estimation of population size. Associated vital rates responsible for this variation also may vary geographically and in response to local ecological conditions, with the result that subunits of a metapopulation may have different trajectories. Both temporal and spatial variation in population size occurs not only as a result of additions through birth and deletions through death, but also from gains and losses arising from immigration and emigration, respectively. Although virtually all organisms have evolved mechanisms for dispersal, the role of movement in population dynamics has received far less attention than have contributions from recruitment and losses to mortality. I used mark-recapture techniques to make inferences about the role of movement in local population dynamics of Rosss Goose (Chen rossii) colonies by estimating rates of movement between breeding subpopulations in the Queen Maud Gulf metapopulation. I also assessed decision-based philopatry (i.e., the role of previous nesting outcome; sensu Hoover 2003) and a potential cost of reproduction to female geese through experimental manipulation of nesting success. <p>Previous nest fate influenced intra-colony dispersal as failed nesters moved further between consecutive nest sites, but inter-colony movement was not affected by previous nest fate. Regardless of previous nest fate, Rosss Geese did not exhibit philopatry to nest sites, or to breeding territories, suggesting that philopatry occurs at a larger spatial scale. Breeding success accounted for a detectable, but only small amount of variation (<11%) in dispersal distance within colonies. I suggest that temporal variation in habitat availability favors flexibility in settling patterns by geese in a changing matrix of habitat availability, governed largely by receding snow cover. Such flexibility is necessary for nesting as early as possible, because recruitment is strongly linked to timing of breeding by arctic-nesting geese. Colonial philopatry may be important not only for favorable nesting but also for access to high-quality feeding areas adjacent to colonies. Such feeding areas represent a predictable food resource important not only to growing goslings, but also adult survival regardless of the outcome of their breeding attempt. <p>I concluded from experimental manipulation that successful reproduction was encumbered with a cost to survival of females. I argue that such a cost of breeding is more likely to be incurred when climatic conditions during incubation are harsh, and when the breeding population is larger. <p>I did not find evidence for geographic variation in survival, but rates of philopatry varied markedly among colonies. The substantial exchange of females among breeding colonies (1) underscores the potential for dispersal to alter breeding distribution, (2) demonstrates that the influence of immigration on colony-specific rates of population growth was nontrivial, and (3) provides behavioral evidence for extensive gene flow resulting from female dispersal. Estimates of emigration and survival from my studies were used in combination with those for fecundity parameters and colony-specific population growth rates (lambda) to interpolate the role of immigration from a simple balance equation. During years for which rates of movement were estimated, immigration constituted 9-20% of lambda at the Karrak Lake colony, suggesting that movement was an important contribution to population growth.
|
2 |
The role of dispersal in population dynamics of breeding Ross's geeseDrake, Kiel L. 27 April 2006 (has links)
Spatial variation in density of organisms can lead to challenges in estimation of population size. Associated vital rates responsible for this variation also may vary geographically and in response to local ecological conditions, with the result that subunits of a metapopulation may have different trajectories. Both temporal and spatial variation in population size occurs not only as a result of additions through birth and deletions through death, but also from gains and losses arising from immigration and emigration, respectively. Although virtually all organisms have evolved mechanisms for dispersal, the role of movement in population dynamics has received far less attention than have contributions from recruitment and losses to mortality. I used mark-recapture techniques to make inferences about the role of movement in local population dynamics of Rosss Goose (Chen rossii) colonies by estimating rates of movement between breeding subpopulations in the Queen Maud Gulf metapopulation. I also assessed decision-based philopatry (i.e., the role of previous nesting outcome; sensu Hoover 2003) and a potential cost of reproduction to female geese through experimental manipulation of nesting success. <p>Previous nest fate influenced intra-colony dispersal as failed nesters moved further between consecutive nest sites, but inter-colony movement was not affected by previous nest fate. Regardless of previous nest fate, Rosss Geese did not exhibit philopatry to nest sites, or to breeding territories, suggesting that philopatry occurs at a larger spatial scale. Breeding success accounted for a detectable, but only small amount of variation (<11%) in dispersal distance within colonies. I suggest that temporal variation in habitat availability favors flexibility in settling patterns by geese in a changing matrix of habitat availability, governed largely by receding snow cover. Such flexibility is necessary for nesting as early as possible, because recruitment is strongly linked to timing of breeding by arctic-nesting geese. Colonial philopatry may be important not only for favorable nesting but also for access to high-quality feeding areas adjacent to colonies. Such feeding areas represent a predictable food resource important not only to growing goslings, but also adult survival regardless of the outcome of their breeding attempt. <p>I concluded from experimental manipulation that successful reproduction was encumbered with a cost to survival of females. I argue that such a cost of breeding is more likely to be incurred when climatic conditions during incubation are harsh, and when the breeding population is larger. <p>I did not find evidence for geographic variation in survival, but rates of philopatry varied markedly among colonies. The substantial exchange of females among breeding colonies (1) underscores the potential for dispersal to alter breeding distribution, (2) demonstrates that the influence of immigration on colony-specific rates of population growth was nontrivial, and (3) provides behavioral evidence for extensive gene flow resulting from female dispersal. Estimates of emigration and survival from my studies were used in combination with those for fecundity parameters and colony-specific population growth rates (lambda) to interpolate the role of immigration from a simple balance equation. During years for which rates of movement were estimated, immigration constituted 9-20% of lambda at the Karrak Lake colony, suggesting that movement was an important contribution to population growth.
|
3 |
Parasite-host interactions in an arctic goose colonyHarriman, Vanessa Brooke 02 January 2007
The arctic is currently experiencing some of the greatest rates of warming. Newly emerging diseases in the arctic are of particular interest due to the implications these may have at southern latitudes if temperatures continue to rise around the globe. It is important to document changes in pathogen populations, such as alterations in range, virulence, prevalence, and abundance, and the effect these may have on their host populations. Parasites influence the reproductive success of their hosts in some cases. Studies on impacts of ectoparasites on avian reproductive success have generally been focused on species with altricial young. I studied the abundance of an apparently newly emerging nest-parasite and the effects of this parasite on Rosss (<i>Chen rossii</i>) and lesser snow goose (<i>Chen caerulescens caerulescens</i>) reproductive success in the Karrak Lake goose colony, Nunavut, Canada from 2001 to 2004. <p>The nest parasite, identified as the flea <i>Ceratophyllus vagabundus vagabundus</i>, was associated with goose eggs covered with spots of blood. The proportion of goose egg-shells covered by blood was positively correlated with flea abundance in the nest. This relationship allowed the use egg blood-coverage as an index of flea abundance for remaining analyses. Flea abundance in goose nests was associated with variables associated with the host and the hosts habitat. I used general linear models in conjunction with Akaikes information criterion (AIC) to determine which factors were most important in influencing flea abundance in goose nests. The most parsimonious model to explain the relationship between egg blood coverage and flea abundance in goose nests included goose clutch size, age of nest bowl (new vs. old), history of nesting by geese on a specific plot within the colony, habitat within 0.5m of nest, and year. The best predictor of flea abundance was the age of the nest bowl, with nest bowls re-used by geese containing more fleas than new bowls. This relationship was expected as fleas over-wintered in goose nests at the Karrak Lake colony.<p>
Logistic regression and AIC were used to determine whether egg blood-coverage was an important variable influencing nest success. All top five models included blood-coverage. Goose nest success was negatively influenced by fleas in most years. There was a threshold of egg blood-coverage at which nest success was affected, and this threshold varied, with >20% blood indicating a significant decline in nest success in two years, and >5% blood-coverage indicating a decrease in nest success in one year. To my knowledge, this is the first study that has examined the parasites of avian nests in an arctic ecosystem and was also the first to investigate the effect of nest parasites on birds with precocial young. More research is needed to determine what factors limit this flea population and whether fleas may become a regulating factor for geese in the Karrak Lake colony.
|
4 |
Parasite-host interactions in an arctic goose colonyHarriman, Vanessa Brooke 02 January 2007 (has links)
The arctic is currently experiencing some of the greatest rates of warming. Newly emerging diseases in the arctic are of particular interest due to the implications these may have at southern latitudes if temperatures continue to rise around the globe. It is important to document changes in pathogen populations, such as alterations in range, virulence, prevalence, and abundance, and the effect these may have on their host populations. Parasites influence the reproductive success of their hosts in some cases. Studies on impacts of ectoparasites on avian reproductive success have generally been focused on species with altricial young. I studied the abundance of an apparently newly emerging nest-parasite and the effects of this parasite on Rosss (<i>Chen rossii</i>) and lesser snow goose (<i>Chen caerulescens caerulescens</i>) reproductive success in the Karrak Lake goose colony, Nunavut, Canada from 2001 to 2004. <p>The nest parasite, identified as the flea <i>Ceratophyllus vagabundus vagabundus</i>, was associated with goose eggs covered with spots of blood. The proportion of goose egg-shells covered by blood was positively correlated with flea abundance in the nest. This relationship allowed the use egg blood-coverage as an index of flea abundance for remaining analyses. Flea abundance in goose nests was associated with variables associated with the host and the hosts habitat. I used general linear models in conjunction with Akaikes information criterion (AIC) to determine which factors were most important in influencing flea abundance in goose nests. The most parsimonious model to explain the relationship between egg blood coverage and flea abundance in goose nests included goose clutch size, age of nest bowl (new vs. old), history of nesting by geese on a specific plot within the colony, habitat within 0.5m of nest, and year. The best predictor of flea abundance was the age of the nest bowl, with nest bowls re-used by geese containing more fleas than new bowls. This relationship was expected as fleas over-wintered in goose nests at the Karrak Lake colony.<p>
Logistic regression and AIC were used to determine whether egg blood-coverage was an important variable influencing nest success. All top five models included blood-coverage. Goose nest success was negatively influenced by fleas in most years. There was a threshold of egg blood-coverage at which nest success was affected, and this threshold varied, with >20% blood indicating a significant decline in nest success in two years, and >5% blood-coverage indicating a decrease in nest success in one year. To my knowledge, this is the first study that has examined the parasites of avian nests in an arctic ecosystem and was also the first to investigate the effect of nest parasites on birds with precocial young. More research is needed to determine what factors limit this flea population and whether fleas may become a regulating factor for geese in the Karrak Lake colony.
|
Page generated in 0.0789 seconds