Prp20, the Saccharomyces cerevisiae homolog to the mammalian regulator of chromosome condensation, RCC1, binds to double-stranded (ds) DNA in vitro through a multi-component complex. Three members of this complex bind GTP in vitro. The Prp20 complex specifically loses its ability to bind dsDNA during DNA replication as determined by an in vitro assay using cell extracts from arrested cdc mutants. This loss of dsDNA-binding activity does not affect the proper organization of the nucleoplasm as was the case for the prp20-1 and prp20-7 mutants, suggesting a segregation exists in the biochemical activities of the Prp20 protein. Detailed analysis of Prp20 demonstrates that specific and highly conserved amino acids coordinate these distinct activities of the Prp20 complex. These essential residues are mainly located in the second and the third repeats of the amino terminus and the last two repeats of the carboxyl terminus of Prp20. Furthermore, mutations in the last two repeats are suppressed by Gsp1, one of the GTP-binding components of the Prp20 complex, but not the mutations in the amino-terminus of Prp20.

No description available.

Les protéines de type SMC (pour « Structural Maintenance of Chromosomes ») sont impliquées dans différents aspects de la dynamique du chromosome tels que la condensation, la ségrégation et la réparation de l’ADN. En effet, une souche de Bacillus subtilis dépourvue de SMC présente des phénotypes sévères tels qu’un défaut dans la compaction et le partitionnement du chromosome, une sensibilité accrue à certaines drogues endommageant l’ADN ainsi qu’à des inhibiteurs de gyrase. Une telle souche est incapable de croître en condition de croissance rapide. Pour comprendre l’étendue des phénotypes associés à la perte de ce gène, une identification génétique de nouveaux partenaires a été entreprise : des suppresseurs spontanés de la délétion de smc ont été isolés en condition de croissance rapide. Différentes classes de suppresseurs ont été mises en évidence, suggérant que différentes mutations pouvaient restaurer la viabilité d’une souche dépourvue de SMC. Leur caractérisation a révélé qu'ils permettaient de restaurer une partie des défauts que présente le mutant Δsmc, en particulier la résistance aux inhibiteurs de gyrase, et semblaient limiter la formation de cassures de l'ADN. Par séquençage du génome complet des suppresseurs, certaines de ces mutations ont pu être identifiées, et semblent causer une perturbation de la voie de biosynthèse des ARN de transfert. Cette perturbation permet de restaurer le défaut de croissance, et ce plus efficacement qu’une inhibition de la traduction par des drogues comme le chloramphénicol, ou par la réduction du pool de nucléotides par l’hydroxyurée. L’ensemble de ces résultats suggère que la réponse stringente pourrait être en partie responsable du phénotype suppresseur. Il est proposé qu’en dehors de la compaction du chromosome, le complexe SMC soit directement impliqué dans le maintien de l’intégrité des fourches de réplication. / SMC proteins (for "Structural Maintenance of Chromosomes") are involved in different aspects of chromosome dynamic such as condensation, segregation and DNA repair. Indeed, a Bacillus subtilis mutant lacking the SMC complex shows severe phenotypes such as defects in condensation and chromosome partitioning, an increase in sensitivity DNA damaging drugs or gyrase inhibitors. The viability of such strain is limited to conditions of slow growth. To understand the range of phenotypes associated with loss of this gene, a genetic identification of new partners was undertaken: spontaneous suppressors of smc deletion were isolated in rapid growth conditions. Different classes of suppressors have been identified, suggesting that different mutations could restore the viability of a strain lacking SMC complex. Characterization of suppressors revealed they can restore some of the defects shown in Δsmc mutant, particularly resistance to gyrase inhibitors, and seemed to limit the formation of DNA breaks. By sequencing the complete genome of suppressors, some of these mutations have been identified and cause an alteration of the biosynthetic pathway of transfer RNA. This disruption can restore the growth defect more efficiently than inhibition of translation by drugs such as chloramphenicol, or by reducing the pool of nucleotides by hydroxyurea. Taken together, these results suggest that the stringent response could be partly responsible for the suppressor phenotype. It is proposed that apart from the compaction of the chromosome, the SMC complex is directly involved in maintaining the integrity of replication forks.

ADN subit une série de transformations structurelles complexes au cours de la division cellulaire, ce qui entraîne dans son compactage chromosomes mitotiques par un processus appelé la condensation des chromosomes. Le complexe de condensine pentamérique est fortement impliqué comme un effecteur majeur de ce phénomène. Il s'agit d'un complexe protéine de sous-unités multiples avec deux sous-unités catalytiques [SMC- Structural Maintenance of Chromosomes] et de trois sous-unités de régulation, hautement conservés de la levure à l'homme. Le complexe de condensine dans Saccharomyces cerevisiae est constitué de deux sous-unités de SMC [Smc2 et Smc4] et trois protéines non réglementaires [Brn1, Ycs4, Ycg1]. Malgré son importance, le mécanisme d'action de condensine reste largement inconnu. Par conséquent, l'objectif de cette recherche est de comprendre le mécanisme d'action de condensine et comment elle est affectée par l'interaction entre ses sous-unités réglementaires et non-réglementaires. Cette thèse identifie quatre morphologies dépendants du cycle cellulaire distincts du locus d'ADNr. Cette transformation du phénotype ADNr de G1 à la mitose dépend condensine. Afin de déterminer le rôle de l'interaction entre les sous-unités catalytiques et réglementaires de condensine dans la régulation du complexe condensine, nous avons identifié six résidus positifs sur l'extrémité C-terminale de BRN1 qui affectent la formation du complexe condensine, l'activité de la condensation et l'interaction avec tubuline, ce qui suggère que ces résidus ont un rôle dans la régulation de condensine. Ensemble, nos résultats suggèrent un modèle de règlement du condensine par l'interaction entre les sous-unités de condensine. / DNA undergoes a series of complex structural transformations during cell division, resulting in its compaction into intact mitotic chromosomes called chromosome condensation. The pentameric condensin complex has been strongly implicated as a major effector of this phenomenon. It is a multi-subunit protein complex with two catalytic “Structural maintenance of chromosome” [SMC] subunits and three regulatory subunits, highly conserved from yeast to humans. The condensin complex in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is made up of two SMC subunits [Smc2 and Smc4] and three regulatory non-SMC proteins [Brn1, Ycs4, Ycg1]. Despite its importance, the mechanism of action of condensin remains largely unknown. Hence, the objective of this research is to understand the mechanism of action of condensin and how it is affected by interaction between its regulatory and non-regulatory sub-units. This thesis identifies four distinct cell cycle dependent morphologies of the rDNA locus. The transformation of the rDNA phenotype from G1 to mitosis is condensin dependent. In order to determine the role of the interaction between the catalytic and regulatory subunits of condensin in the regulation of the condensin complex, we have identified six positive residues on the C-terminus of Brn1 which affect complex formation, condensation activity and interaction with tubulin, suggesting that these residues have a role in condensin regulation. Together, our results suggest a model for condensin regulation by interaction between condensin subunits.

Yes / The proteins of SMC family are characterised by having Walker A and B sites. The Escherichia coli RecN protein is a prokaryotic member of SMC family that involved in the induced excision of Tn10 and the repair of the DNA double strand breaks. In this work, the Walker A nucleotide binding site of the E. coli RecN protein was mutated by changing the highly conserved lysine residue 35 to the aspartic acid (D), designated as recN(K35D). Reverse genetics was utilized to delete the entire recN gene (Delta recN108) or introduce the recN(K35D) gene into the E. coli chromosomal DNA. The recN(K35D) cells showed decreasing in the frequency of excision of Tn10 from gal76

La division cellulaire est un processus fondamental des êtres vivants. À chaque division cellulaire, le matériel génétique d'une cellule mère est dupliqué et ségrégé pour produire deux cellules filles identiques; un processus nommé la mitose. Tout d'abord, la cellule doit condenser le matériel génétique pour être en mesure de séparer mécaniquement et également le matériel génétique. Une erreur dans le niveau de compaction ou dans la dynamique de la mitose occasionne une transmission inégale du matériel génétique. Il est suggéré dans la littérature que ces phénomènes pourraient causé la transformation des cellules cancéreuses. Par contre, le mécanisme moléculaire générant la coordination des changements de haut niveau de la condensation des chromosomes est encore incompris. Dans les dernières décennies, plusieurs approches expérimentales ont identifié quelques protéines conservées dans ce processus. Pour déterminer le rôle de ces facteurs dans la compaction des chromosomes, j'ai effectué un criblage par ARNi couplé à de l'imagerie à haute-résolution en temps réel chez l'embryon de C. elegans. Grâce à cette technique, j'ai découvert sept nouvelles protéines requises pour l'assemblage des chromosomes mitotiques, incluant la Ribonucléotide réductase (RNR) et Topoisomérase II (topo-II). Dans cette thèse, je décrirai le rôle structural de topo-II dans l'assemblage des chromosomes mitotiques et ces mécanismes moléculaires. Lors de la condensation des chromosomes, topo-II agit indépendamment comme un facteur d'assemblage local menant par la suite à la formation d'un axe de condensation tout au long du chromosome. Cette localisation est à l'opposé de la position des autres facteurs connus qui sont impliqués dans la condensation des chromosomes. Ceci représente un nouveau mécanisme pour l'assemblage des chromosomes chez C. elegans. De plus, j'ai découvert un rôle non-enzymatique à la protéine RNR lors de l'assemblage des chromosomes. Lors de ce processus, RNR est impliqué dans la stabilité des nucléosomes et alors, permet la compaction de haut niveau de la chromatine. Dans cette thèse, je rapporte également des résultats préliminaires concernant d'autres nouveaux facteurs découverts lors du criblage ARNi. Le plus important est que mon analyse révèle que la déplétion des nouvelles protéines montre des phénotypes distincts, indiquant la fonction de celles-ci lors de l'assemblage des chromosomes. Somme toute, je conclus que les chromosomes en métaphase sont assemblés par trois protéines ayant des activités différentes d'échafaudage: topoisomérase II, les complexes condensines et les protéines centromériques. En conclusion, ces études prouvent le mécanisme moléculaire de certaines protéines qui contribuent à la formation des chromosomes mitotiques. / Cell division is a fundamental process that continuously happens in all living organisms. In each cell division, genetic material of the parent cell duplicates and segregates to produce genetically identical daughter cells in a process called mitosis. Cells need to condense their genetic material to be able to partition them equally. Any subtle defects, either timing or compaction level, could lead to the unequal inheritance of genetic material, a phenomenon that is believed to be the leading cause of cancerous transformation. However, the precise molecular mechanisms underlying the coordinated changes of higher-order chromosome structure are poorly understood. In the last two decades, various approaches have identified several conserved factors required for chromosome condensation. To define the roles of known and novel factors in this process, I performed an RNAi based screen using high-resolution live imaging of the C. elegans one-cell embryo. Importantly, using an in vivo approach, I discovered seven novel factors required for mitotic chromosome assembly, including Ribonulceotide reducatase (RNR) and DNA topoisomerase II (topo-II). In this thesis, I report a structural role for topo-II in mitotic chromosome assembly and underlying molecular mechanisms. During chromosome condensation process, topo-II acts independently as a local assembly factor leading to global chromosome axis formation, contradicting models that chromosomes organize around preassembled scaffolds, thus representing a novel pathway for chromosome assembly in C. elegans. Furthermore, I also discovered a non-enzymatic role of RNR in the mitotic chromosome assembly process. During this process, RNR is involved in nucleosome stability, and thereby, it allows higher-order chromatin assembly. In this thesis, I also report preliminary data for other novel factors that I discovered in the RNAi based screen for factors involved in chromosome condensation. Importantly, my analyses revealed that the depletion of several proteins results in distinct chromosome condensation phenotypes, indicating that they function in discrete events during mitotic chromosome assembly. In sum, I conclude that metaphase chromosomes are built by the distinct scaffolding activities of three proteins: DNA topoisomerase II, condensin complexes and centromere proteins. Taken together, these studies provide underlying molecular mechanisms contributing to the mitotic chromosome formation.

Meiosis is a specialized type of cell division essential for the production of four normal haploid gametes. In early prophase I of meiosis, the intimate synapsis between homologous chromosomes, and the formation of chiasmata, is facilitated by a proteinaceous structure known as the synaptonemal complex (SC). Ultrastructural analysis of germ cells of a number of organisms has disclosed that SC is a specialized tripartite structure composed of two lateral elements, one on each homolog, and a central element, which, in turn, are linked by transverse elements. Genetic studies have revealed that defects in meiotic chromosome alignment and/or segregation result in aneuploidy, which is the leading cause of spontaneous miscarriages in humans, hereditary birth defects such as Down syndrome, and are also, associated with the development and progression of certain forms of cancer. The mechanism(s) underlying the alignment/pairing of chromosomes at meiosis I differ among organisms. These can be divided into at least two broad pathways: one is independent of DNA double-strand breaks (DSB) and other is mediated by DSBs. In the DSB-dependent pathway, SC plays crucial roles in promoting homolog pairing and disjunction. On the other hand, the DSB-independent pathway involves the participation of telomeres, centromeres and non-coding RNAs in the pre-synaptic alignment, pre-meiotic pairing as well as pairing of homologous chromosomes. Although a large body of literature highlights the central role of SC in meiotic recombination, the possible role of SC components in homolog recognition and alignment is poorly understood. Genetic screens for Saccharomyces cerevisiae mutants defective in meiosis and sporulation lead to the isolation of genes required for interhomolog recombination, including those that encode SC components. In S. cerevisiae, ten meiosis-specific proteins viz., Hop1, Red1, Mek1, Hop2, Pch2, Zip1, Zip2, Zip3, Zip4 and Rec8 have been recognized as bona fide constituents of SC or associated with SC function. Mutations in any of these genes result in defective SC formation, thus leading to reduction in the rate of recombination. HOP1 (Homolog Pairing) encodes a ̴ 70 kDa structural protein, which localizes to the lateral elements of SC. It was found to be essential for the progression of meiotic recombination. In hop1Δ mutants, meiosis specific DSBs are reduced to 10% of that of wild type level and it fails to produce viable spores. It also displays relatively high frequency of inter-sister recombination over inter-homolog recombination. Bioinformatics analysis suggests that Hop1 comprises of an N-terminal HORMA domain (Hop1, Rev7 and Mad2), which is conserved among Hop1 homologs from diverse organisms. This domain is also known to be present in proteins involved in processes like chromosome synapsis, repair and sex chromosome inactivation. Additionally, Hop1 harbors a 36-amino acid long zinc finger 348374 motif (CX2CX19CX2C) which is critical for DNA binding and meiotic progression, and a putative nuclear localization signal corresponding to amino acid residues from 588-594. Previous studies suggested that purified Hop1 protein exists in multiple oligomeric states in solution and displays structure specific DNA binding activity. Importantly, Hop1 exhibited higher binding affinity for the Holliday junction (HJ), over other early recombination intermediates. Binding of Hop1 to the HJ at the core resulted in branch migration of the junction, albeit weakly. Intriguingly, Hop1 showed a high binding affinity for G4 DNA, a non-B DNA structure, implicated in homolog synapsis and promotes robust synapsis between double-stranded DNA molecules. Hop1 protein used in the foregoing biochemical studies was purified from mitotically dividing S. cerevisiae cells containing the recombinant plasmid over-expressing the protein where the yields were often found to be in the low-microgram quantities. Therefore, one of the major limitations to the application of high resolution biophysical techniques, such as X-crystallography and spectroscopic analyses for structure-function studies of S. cerevisiae Hop1 has been the non-availability of sufficient quantities of functionally active pure protein. In this study, we have performed expression screening in Escherichia coli host strains, capable of high level expression of soluble S. cerevisiae Hop1 protein. A new protocol has been developed +2 for expression and purification of S. cerevisiae Hop1 protein, using Ni-NTA and double-stranded DNA-cellulose chromatography. Recombinant S. cerevisiae Hop1 protein thus obtained was >98% pure and exhibited DNA binding activity with high-affinity for Holliday junction. The availability of the bacterial HOP1 expression vector and functionally active Hop1 protein has enabled us to glean and understand several vital biological insights into the structure-function relationships of Hop1 as well as the generation of appropriate truncated mutant proteins. Mutational analyses in S. cerevisiae has shown that sister chromatid cohesion is required for proper chromosome condensation, including the formation of axial elements, SC assembly and recombination. Consistent with these findings, homolog alignment is impaired in red1hop1 strains and associations between homologs are less stable. red1 mutants fail to make any discernible axial elements or SC structures but exhibit normal chromosome condensation, while hop1 mutants form long fragments of axial elements but without any SCs, are defective in chromosome condensation, and produce in-viable spores. Using single molecule and ensemble assays, we found that S. cerevisiae Hop1 organizes DNA into at least four major distinct DNA conformations: (i) a rigid protein filament along DNA that blocks access to nucleases; (ii) bridging of non-contiguous segments of DNA to form stem-loop structures; (iii) intra-and intermolecular long range synapsis between double-stranded DNA molecules; and (iv) folding of DNA into higher order nucleoprotein structures. Consistent with B. McClintock’s proposal that “there is a tendency for chromosomes to associate 2-by-2 in the prophase of meiosis involving long distance recognition of homologs”, these results to our knowledge provide the first evidence that Hop1 mediates the formation of tight DNA-protein-DNA nucleofilaments independent of homology which might help in the synapsis of homologous chromosomes during meiosis. Although the DNA binding properties of Hop1 are relatively well established, comparable knowledge about the protein is lacking. The purification of Hop1 from E. coli, which was functionally indistinguishable from the protein obtained from mitotically dividing S. cerevisiae cells has enabled us to investigate the structure-function relationships of Hop1, which has provided important insights into its role in meiotic recombination. We present several lines of evidence suggesting that Hop1 is a modular protein, consisting of an intrinsically unstructured N-terminal domain and a core C-terminal domain (Hop1CTD), the latter being functionally equivalent to the full-length Hop1 in terms of its in vitro activities. Importantly, however, Hop1CTD was unable to rescue the meiotic recombination defects of hop1null strain, indicating that synergy between the N-terminal and C-terminal domains of Hop1 protein is essential for meiosis and spore formation. Taken together, our findings provide novel insights into the molecular functions of Hop1, which has profound implications for the assembly of mature SC, homolog synapsis and recombination. Several lines of investigations suggest that HORMA domain containing proteins are involved in chromatin binding and, consequently, have been shown to play key roles in processes such as meiotic cell cycle checkpoint, DNA replication, double-strand break repair and chromosome synapsis. S. cerevisiae encodes three HORMA domain containing proteins: Hop1, Rev7 and Mad2 (HORMA) which interact with chromatin during diverse chromosomal processes. The data presented above suggest that Hop1 is a modular protein containing a distinct N-terminal and C-terminal (Hop1CTD) domains. The N-terminal domain of Hop1, which corresponds to the evolutionarily conserved HORMA domain, although, discovered first in Hop1, its precise biochemical functions remain unknown. In this section, we show that Hop1-HORMA domain expressed in and purified from E. coli exhibits preferential binding to the HJ and G4 DNA, over other early recombination intermediates. Detailed functional analyses of Hop1-HORMA domain, using mobility shift assays, DNase I footprinting and FRET, have revealed that HORMA binds at the core of Holliday junction and induces marked changes in its global conformation. Further experimental evidence also suggested that it causes DNA stiffening and condensation. However, like Hop1CTD, HORMA domain alone failed to rescue the meiotic recombination defects of hop1 null strain, indicating that synergy between the N-and C-terminal domains of Hop1 is essential for meiosis as well as for the formation of haploid gametes. Moreover, these results strongly implicate that Hop1 protein harbours a second DNA binding motif, which resides in the HORMA domain at its N-terminal region. To our knowledge, these findings also provide the first insights into the biochemical mechanism underlying HORMA domain activity. In summary, it appears that the C-terminal (CTD) and N-terminal (HORMA) domains of Hop1 may perform biochemical functions similar (albeit less efficiently) to that of the full-length Hop1. However, further research is required to uncover the functional differences between these domains, their respective interacting partners and modulation of the activity of these domains.