Submitted by Leticia Schettini (leticia@ufrrj.br) on 2017-03-17T13:12:34Z No. of bitstreams: 1 2001 - Marilene Alvares.pdf: 614893 bytes, checksum: ca3d3b41579b663ff4afa2939a0a892f (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2017-03-17T13:12:34Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 2001 - Marilene Alvares.pdf: 614893 bytes, checksum: ca3d3b41579b663ff4afa2939a0a892f (MD5) Previous issue date: 2001-08-15 / Coordena??o de Aperfei?oamento de Pessoal de N?vel Superior - CAPES / The habromatids biology and their patogenies have abready been well studied. But not na efficient technique has been developed, or peridically tested for the diagnosis of the gastric habronemiasis in equidae. Has been proposed the compation of two techniques: the UENO (1986) technique and UENO & GUTIERRES (1983), modified and the xenodiagnostic technique. On the Ueno (modified) technique to recuperate first stage larvae, has been used fecal examples of 3g and 5g, with 3 repetitions for each. From each example has been taken 0,3 ml of the sediment, divided in three microscope slides and then the slides were observed though the light microscope for counting the larvae number of Habronema spp. or Drashia megastoma. To the xenodiagnostic, larvae of Musca domestica and Stomoxys calcitrans (Muscidae: Diptera) were inoculated in the equidae feces and then were kept in the laboratory. The adults muscoids0 were dissected and the third stage larvae of the nematodes were saved and counted. The adults nematodes were colected from the stomach of 35 equidae then fixed in AFA and preserved in alcohol 70% for later identification. The comparative analysis were based on the linear correlation. The comparation of the determination rates indicated that there weren?t significative difference on the recuperation of larvae on the Ueno (modified) technique, with the two different examples weights and the xenodiagnostic technique. The Ueno (modified) technique utilizing 3g and 5g of feces had the same index of determination, 73%. The test t analysis showed no significant difference between the three slides on the Ueno technique observation. While the xenodiagnostic technique got a determination rate of 79,1%, when utilizing only M. domestica and the two especies of females of Habronema spp. And the determination index of 81,3% when utilizing M. domestica and females of Habronema muscae based on the linear correlation. / A biologia das Habronemat?neos e suas patogenias j? foi bem estudada. No entanto, nenhuma t?cnica coprosc?pica eficiente foi desenvolvida e rotineiramente testada para o diagn?stico da habronemose g?strica em eq??deos. Foi proposta a compara??o de duas t?cnicas: a t?cnica de UENO (1968) e UENO & GUTIERRES (1983) modificada e a t?cnica do xenodiagn?stico. Na t?cnica de Ueno (modificada) para recupera??o da larva de primeiro est?gio, foi utilizado amostras contendo 3g e 5g de fezes, com tr?s reparti??es para cada amostra de fezes. De cada amostra foi retirado 0,3 ml de sedimento, dividindo em tr?s l?minas sendo levado ao microsc?pio ?tico para contagem do n?mero de larvas de Habronema spp. ou Drashia megastoma. Para o xenodiagn?stico, larvas de Musca domestica e Stomoxys calcitrans (Muscidae: Diptera) foram inoculadas nas fezes dos eq??deos e mantidos em laborat?rio. Os musc?deos adultos foram dissecados e as formas de terceiro est?gio dos nemat?ides recuperados e contados. Os nemat?ides adultos foram coletados do est?mago de 35 eq??deos, fixados em AFA e conservados em ?lcool a 70%, para posterior identifica??o. A an?lise comparativa foi baseada na regress?o linear. A compara??o dos ?ndices de determina??o indicaram n?o haver diferen?a significativa na recupera??o de larvas na t?cnica de Ueno (modificada), com os dois diferentes pesos de amostras de fezes e a t?cnica do xenodiagn?stico. A t?cnica de Ueno (modificada) utilizando 3g e 5g de fezes obteve o mesmo ?ndice de determina??o 73%. A an?lise do teste t demonstrou n?o existir diferen?a significativa entre as tr?s l?minas na leitura da t?cnica de sedimenta??o. Enquanto a t?cnica do xenodiagn?stico obteve o ?ndice de determina??o de 79,1% quando utilizado apenas M. domestica para realiza??o desta, e as duas esp?cies de f?meas de Habronema spp. e o ?ndice de determina??o de 81,3% quando utilizado M. domestica e f?meas de Habronema muscae como base da regress?o linear.

Submitted by Leticia Schettini (leticia@ufrrj.br) on 2017-04-27T14:24:12Z No. of bitstreams: 1 2001 - Marilene Alvares.pdf: 614893 bytes, checksum: ca3d3b41579b663ff4afa2939a0a892f (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2017-04-27T14:24:12Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 2001 - Marilene Alvares.pdf: 614893 bytes, checksum: ca3d3b41579b663ff4afa2939a0a892f (MD5) Previous issue date: 2001-09-13 / Coordena??o de Aperfei?oamento de Pessoal de N?vel Superior - CAPES / The habromatids biology and their patogenies have abready been well studied. But not na efficient technique has been developed, or peridically tested for the diagnosis of the gastric habronemiasis in equidae. Has been proposed the compation of two techniques: the UENO (1986) technique and UENO & GUTIERRES (1983), modified and the xenodiagnostic technique. On the Ueno (modified) technique to recuperate first stage larvae, has been used fecal examples of 3g and 5g, with 3 repetitions for each. From each example has been taken 0,3 ml of the sediment, divided in three microscope slides and then the slides were observed though the light microscope for counting the larvae number of Habronema spp. or Drashia megastoma. To the xenodiagnostic, larvae of Musca domestica and Stomoxys calcitrans (Muscidae: Diptera) were inoculated in the equidae feces and then were kept in the laboratory. The adults muscoids0 were dissected and the third stage larvae of the nematodes were saved and counted. The adults nematodes were colected from the stomach of 35 equidae then fixed in AFA and preserved in alcohol 70% for later identification. The comparative analysis were based on the linear correlation. The comparation of the determination rates indicated that there weren?t significative difference on the recuperation of larvae on the Ueno (modified) technique, with the two different examples weights and the xenodiagnostic technique. The Ueno (modified) technique utilizing 3g and 5g of feces had the same index of determination, 73%. The test t analysis showed no significant difference between the three slides on the Ueno technique observation. While the xenodiagnostic technique got a determination rate of 79,1%, when utilizing only M. domestica and the two especies of females of Habronema spp. And the determination index of 81,3% when utilizing M. domestica and females of Habronema muscae based on the linear correlation. / A biologia das Habronemat?neos e suas patogenias j? foi bem estudada. No entanto, nenhuma t?cnica coprosc?pica eficiente foi desenvolvida e rotineiramente testada para o diagn?stico da habronemose g?strica em eq??deos. Foi proposta a compara??o de duas t?cnicas: a t?cnica de UENO (1968) e UENO & GUTIERRES (1983) modificada e a t?cnica do xenodiagn?stico. Na t?cnica de Ueno (modificada) para recupera??o da larva de primeiro est?gio, foi utilizado amostras contendo 3g e 5g de fezes, com tr?s reparti??es para cada amostra de fezes. De cada amostra foi retirado 0,3 ml de sedimento, dividindo em tr?s l?minas sendo levado ao microsc?pio ?tico para contagem do n?mero de larvas de Habronema spp. ou Drashia megastoma. Para o xenodiagn?stico, larvas de Musca domestica e Stomoxys calcitrans (Muscidae: Diptera) foram inoculadas nas fezes dos eq??deos e mantidos em laborat?rio. Os musc?deos adultos foram dissecados e as formas de terceiro est?gio dos nemat?ides recuperados e contados. Os nemat?ides adultos foram coletados do est?mago de 35 eq??deos, fixados em AFA e conservados em ?lcool a 70%, para posterior identifica??o. A an?lise comparativa foi baseada na regress?o linear. A compara??o dos ?ndices de determina??o indicaram n?o haver diferen?a significativa na recupera??o de larvas na t?cnica de Ueno (modificada), com os dois diferentes pesos de amostras de fezes e a t?cnica do xenodiagn?stico. A t?cnica de Ueno (modificada) utilizando 3g e 5g de fezes obteve o mesmo ?ndice de determina??o 73%. A an?lise do teste t demonstrou n?o existir diferen?a significativa entre as tr?s l?minas na leitura da t?cnica de sedimenta??o. Enquanto a t?cnica do xenodiagn?stico obteve o ?ndice de determina??o de 79,1% quando utilizado apenas M. domestica para realiza??o desta, e as duas esp?cies de f?meas de Habronema spp. e o ?ndice de determina??o de 81,3% quando utilizado M. domestica e f?meas de Habronema muscae como base da regress?o linear.